Distributed image processing over an adaptive Campus Grid

Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 321-336

  Caton, Simon J ^a   Rana, Omer F ^a   Batchelor, Bruce G ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive resource allocation; Condor Campus Grid; MATLAB

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER NETWORKS; CONCURRENCY CONTROL; MATLAB;

ADAPTIVE RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS; CAMPUS GRID; CARDIFF; DISTRIBUTED IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE PROCESSING APPLICATIONS; JOB MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; NODE AVAILABILITY; UNIVERSITY CAMPUS;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 62349098658     PISSN: 15320626     EISSN: 15320634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.1357     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Condor project website. http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/ [May 2008].
2. Litzkow M, Livny M, Mutka M. Condor-A hunter of idle workstations. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Distributed Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, June 1988.
3. Osborne J, Hardisty A. Cardiff University's Condor Pool: Background, Case Studies, and fEC. Proceedings of the UK e-Science All Hands Conference, 361-364.
4. Czarnul P, Ciereszko A, Fraczak M. Towards efficient parallel image processing on cluster grids using GIMP. ICCS 2004 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3037), Bubak M, Albada GDv, Sloot PMA, Dongarra J (eds.). Springer: Berlin, 2004; 451-458.
5. Uhl A. Parallel and distributed processing of visual content: Traditional view and new directions. Proceedings of the 13th Euromicro Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (Euromicro-PDP'05), 2005; 2.
6. Choy R, Edelman A. Parallel MATLAB: Doing it right. Proceedings of the IEEE 2005; 93(2):331-341.
7. Humphrey M, Wasson G. The University of Virginia Campus Grid: Integrating Grid technologies with the Campus information infrastructure. Advances in Grid Computing-EGC 2005 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3470). Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; 50-58.
8. Wallom DCH, Trefethen AE. Oxgrid, a Campus Grid for the University of Oxford. Proceedings of U.K. e-Science Conference, Nottingham, U.K., 2006.
9. Batchelor B. QT, A Machine Vision Prototyping System. http://bruce.cs.cf.ac.uk/bruce/ [May 2008].
10. Bunford-Jones D, Rana OF, Walker DW, Addis M, Surridge M, Hawick K. Resource discovery for dynamic clusters in computational grids. Proceedings of the 15th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, San Francisco, CA, 759-767.
11. Delft University Pattern Recognition Group. PRTools, A Statistical Pattern Recognition Toolbox. http://www.prtools.org/ [May 2008].
12. Delft University Quantitative Imaging Group. DIPLib, A MATLAB Toolbox for Scientific Image Processing and Analysis. http://www.diplib.org/ [May 2008].
13. Oberhuber M. Distributed high-performance image processing on the Internet. Master's Thesis, Graz University of Technology, 1998.
14. Goller A. Parallel processing strategies for large SAR image data sets in a distributed environment. Computing 1999; 62(4):277-291.
15. Goller A, Leberl F. Radar image processing with clusters of computers. Aerospace Conference Proceedings, IEEE, vol. 3, 2000; 281-285.
16. Niederl F, Goller A. Method execution on a distributed image processing back-end. Proceedings of the Sixth Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing, PDP'98, Madrid, Spain, 243-249.
17. Agrawal S, Dongarra J, Seymour K, Vadhiyar S. Netsolve: Past, present, and future; a look at a grid enabled server. Making the global infrastructure a reality, Berman F, Fox G, Hey A (eds.). Wiley Publishing, 2003.
18. Chen Y, Tan SF. MATLAB*G: A grid-based parallel MATLAB. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3863 [May 2008].
19. Moler C. Why There Isn't A Parallel MATLAB. http://www.mathworks. com/company/newsletters/news notes/pdf/spr95cleve.pdf.
20. Lathers A, Su M-H, Kulungowski A, Lin AW, Mehta G, Peltier ST, Deelman E, Ellisman MH. Enabling parallel scientific applications with workflow tools. Challenges of Large Applications in Distributed Environments, IEEE, 2006; 55-60. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs all.jsp?arnumber=1652055.
21. Manolakos ES, Galatopoullos DG, Funk AP. Distributed MATLAB based signal and image processing using javaports. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP'04, Quebec, Canada, 2004; 217-220.
22. Clematis A, D'Agostino D, Galizia A. An object interface for interoperability of image processing parallel library in a distributed environment. ICIAP 2005 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3617), Roli F, Vitulano S (eds.). Springer: Berlin, 2005; 584-591.
23. Hawick KA, James HA, Patten CJ, Vaughan FA. DISCWorld: A distributed high performance computing environment. Proceedings of the HPCN Europe '98, Amsterdam, 21-23 April 1998; 598-605.
24. Petcu D, Iordan V. Grid service based on GIMP for processing remote sensing images. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC'06), 2008; 251-258.
25. Sato M, Nakada H, Sekiguchi S, Matsuoka S, Nagashima U, Takagi H. Ninf: A network based information library for global world-wide computing infrastructure. In Proceedings of HPCN '97 (LNCS-1225) Europe, 1997; 491-502.
26. Muller S, Waller H. Efficient integration of real-time hardware and web based services into MATLAB. Simulation in Industry'99: 11th European Simulation Symposium 1999, Erlangen, Germany, 1999; 41-45.
27. YarKhan A, Seymour K, Sagi K, Shi Z, Dongarra J. Recent developments in GridSolve. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 2006; 20(1):131-142.
28. Caton S, Rana O, Batchelor B. Dynamic condor-based services for distributed image analysis. CCGRID '07: Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2007; 49-56.
29. Bhatt HS, Patel VH, Aggarwal AK. Web enabled client-server model for development environment of distributed image processing. GRID 2000 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1971), Buyya R, Baker M (eds.). Springer: Berlin, 2000; 135-145.
30. Buyya R, Murshed M, Abramson D, Venugopal S. Scheduling parameter sweep applications on global grids: A deadline and budget constrained cost-time optimization algorithm. Software-Practice And Experience 2003; 35:491-512.
31. Jones DR, Jurrus ER, Moon BD, Perrine KA. Gigapixel-size real-time interactive image processing with parallel computers. Proceedings of the International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS'03), 2003.
32. Caan MWA, Vermeer KA. Shaving diffusion tensor images in discriminant analysis: A study into schizophrenia. Medical Image Analysis 2006; 10:841-849.
33. Deelman E, Kosar T, Kesselman C, Livny M. What makes workflows work in an opportunistic environment? Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 2006; 18:1187-1199.
34. Abramson D, Sosic R, Giddy J, Hall B. Nimrod: A tool for performing parameterised simulations using distributed workstations. Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, Washington, DC, 1995; 122-131.
35. Lewis M, Grimshaw A. The core legion object model. Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, 1996; 551-561.
36. Pancake CM, Cook C. What users need in parallel tool support: Survey results and analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE Scalable High-Performance Computing Conference, Knoxville, TN, 1994; 40-47.
37. Thain D, Tannenbaum T, Livny M. Distributed computing in practice: The condor experience. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 2005; 17:323-359.
38. Kleban SD, Clearwater SH. Fair share on high performance computing systems: What does fair really mean? Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGRID'03), 2003; 146-153.