Sentiment analysis: A combined approach

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 143-157

  Prabowo, Rudy ^a   Thelwall, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Hybrid classification; Machine learning; Sentiment analysis; Unsupervised learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 62349089279     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bar-Ilan J. Search engine results over time: A case study on search engine stability. Cybermetrics 2/3 1 (1999)
2. Bar-Ilan J. Data collection methods on the Web for informetric purposes: A review and analysis. Scientometrics 50 1 (2001) 7-32
3. Belew R.K. Finding out about-A cognitive perspective on search engine technology and the WWW. 1st ed (2000), Cambridge University Press
4. Calvo R.A., and Ceccatto H.A. Intelligent document classification. Intelligent Data Analysis 4 5 (2000) 411-420
5. Choi Y., Cardie C., Riloff E., and Patwardhan S. Identifying sources of opinions with conditional random fields and extraction patterns. Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP 2005). Vancouver, BC, Canada (2005, October 6-8) 355-362
6. Church K.W., and Hanks P. Word association norms, mutual information and lexicography. Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). Vancouver, BC (1989, June 26-29) 76-83
7. Cochran W.G. Some methods for strengthening the common-2 tests. Biometrics 10 (1954) 417-451
8. Cohen, W. W. (1995, July 9-12). Fast effective rule induction. In A. Prieditis & S. Russell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th international conference on machine learning (ICML 1995) (pp. 115-123).
9. Conrad, J. G., & Utt, M. H. (1994, July 3-6). A system for discovering relationships by feature extraction from Text Databases. In W. B. Croft & C. J. van Rijsbergen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 260-270).
10. Dave K., Lawrence S., and Pennock D.M. Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. Proceedings of the 12th international WWW conference. Budapest, Hungary (2003, May 20-24) 519-528
11. Dubitzky, W. (1997). Knowledge integration in case-based reasoning: A concept-centred approach. PhD thesis. University of Ulster.
12. Dumais, S., & Chen, H. (2000, July 24-28). Hierarchical classification of Web content. In E. Yannakoudakis, N. J. Belkin, M.-K. Leong, & P. Ingwersen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 256-263).
13. Dunning T.E. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19 1 (1993) 61-74
14. Gamon M. Sentiment classification on customer feedback data: Noisy data, large feature vectors and the role of linguistic analysis. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on computational linguistics (COLING 2004). Geneva, Switzerland (2004, August 23-27) 841-847
15. Gövert, N., Lalmas, M., & Fuhr, N. (1999, November). A probabilistic description-oriented approach for categorizing Web documents. In S. Gauch & I.-Y. Soong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM 1999) (pp. 474-482).
16. Hatzivassiloglou V., and McKeown K.R. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. Proceedings of the 8th conference on European chapter of the association for computational linguistics (1997) 174-181
17. Hiroshi K., Tetsuya N., and Hideo W. Deeper sentiment analysis using machine translation technology. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on computational linguistics (COLING 2004). Geneva, Switzerland (2004, August 23-27) 494-500
18. Ishibuchi H., Nakashima T., and Kuroda T. A hybrid fuzzy GBML algorithm for designing compact fuzzy rule-based classification systems. Proceedings of the 9th IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, Vol. 2 (2000) 706-711
19. Ittner D.J., Lewis D.D., and Ahn D.D. Text categorization of low quality images. Proceedings of the 4th annual symposium on document analysis and information retrieval (SDAIR 1995). Las Vegas, USA (1995, April) 301-315
20. Joachims T. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In: Schölkopf B., Burges C.J.C., and Smola A.J. (Eds). Advances in kernel methods: Support vector learning (1998), The MIT Press
21. Kim S.-M., and Hovy E. Determining the sentiment of opinions. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on computational linguistics (COLING 2004). Geneva, Switzerland (2004, August 23-27) 1367-1373
22. König A.C., and Brill E. Reducing the human overhead in text categorization. Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (2006, August 20-23) 598-603
23. Kuncheva L.I. Fuzzy classifier design. 1st ed (2000), Springer
24. Lewis, D. D. (1998, April 21-24). Naive Bayes at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. In C. N'edellec & C. Rouveirol (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th European conference on machine learning (ECML 1998) (pp. 4-15).
25. Liu, H. (2004). MontyLingua: An end-to-end natural language processor with common sense. Available at ¡ http://web.media.mit.edu/hugo/montylingua¿ Accessed 1 February 2005.
26. Manber U., and Myers G. Suffix arrays: A new method for on-line string searches. Proceedings of the first annual ACM SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms (SODA 1990). San Francisco, California (1990, January 22-24)
27. Market-Sentinel. (2007). Market Sentinel. ¡ http://www.marketsentinel.com¿ Accessed 4 October 2007.
28. Mettrop W., and Nieuwenbuysen P. Internet search engines: Fluctuations in document accessibility. Journal of Documentation 57 5 (2001) 623-651
29. Miller G.A. WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM 38 11 (1995) 39-41
30. MySpace. (2007). MySpace. ¡ http://www.myspace.com¿ Accessed April 2007.
31. Nasukawa T., and Yi J. Sentiment analysis: Capturing favorability using natural language processing. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on knowledge capture. Florida, USA (2003, October 23-25) 70-77
32. Pang, B. (2007). Polarity data set v2.0. October 1997. ¡ http://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/pabo/moviereview-data/¿ Accessed 4 August 2007.
33. Pang B., and Lee L. A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). Barcelona, Spain (2004, July 21-26) 271-278
34. Pang B., and Lee L. Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (2005, June 25-30), University of Michigan, USA 115-124
35. Pang B., Lee L., and Vaithyanathan S. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP 2002). Philadelphia, PA, USA (2002, July 6-7) 79-86
36. Quinlan J.R. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning 1 (1986) 81-106
37. Sebastiani F. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys 34 1 (2002) 1-47
38. Stone P.J., Dunphy D.C., Smith M.S., and Ogilvie D.M. The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis (1966), The MIT Press
39. Swan, R. & Allan, J. (2000, July 24-28). Automatic generation of overview timelines. In E. Yannakoudakis, N. J. Belkin, M.-K. Leong, & P. Ingwersen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 49-56).
40. Thelwall M. Web impact factors and search engine coverage. Journal of Documentation 56 2 (2000) 185-189
41. Thelwall M. Fk yea I swear: Cursing and gender in a corpus of MySpace pages. Corpora 3 1 (2008) 83-107
42. Turney P.D. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). Philadelphia, PA, USA (2002, July 6-12) 417-424
43. Wilson T., Wiebe J., and Hoffmann P. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. Proceeding of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP 2005). Vancouver, BC, Canada (2005, October 6-8) 347-354
44. Witten I.H., and Frank E. Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. 2nd ed (2005), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
45. Yang Y. An evaluation of statistical approaches to text categorization. Information Retrieval 1 1-2 (1999) 69-90
46. Yang, Y. & Liu, X. (1999, August 15-19). A re-examination of text categorization methods. In M. A. Hearst, F. Gey, & R. Tong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 42-49).
47. Yang Y., and Pedersen J.O. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on machine learning (ICML 1997). Nashville, Tennessee (1997, July 8-12) 412-420
48. Yi J., Nasukawa T., Niblack W., and Bunescu R. Sentiment analyzer: Extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM 2003). Florida, USA (2003, November 19-22) 427-434
49. Yin, L. L. & Savio, D. (1996). Learned text categorization by back propagation neural network. Master's thesis. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.