Complementarity of information sent via different bases

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Wu, Shengjun ^a,b   Yu, Sixia ^b,c   Mølmer, Klaus ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; QUANTUM ELECTRONICS; QUANTUM OPTICS;

MUTUALLY UNBIASED BASIS; QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION PROTOCOLS; QUANTUM SYSTEMS; UPPER BOUNDS;

QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY;

EID: 62249206594     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.022320     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, in Proceedings of IEEE international Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India (IEEE, New York, 1984), pp. 175-179.
2. A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661
3. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, and N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 557 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.557
4. D. Bruss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3018 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3018
5. H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4238 (1999) 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4238
6. C. H. Bennett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3121 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68. 3121
7. D. Mayers, J. ACM 48, 351 (2001). 10.1145/382780.382781
8. H.-K. Lo and H. F. Chau, Science 283, 2050 (1999). 10.1126/science.283. 5410.2050
9. P. W. Shor and J. Preskill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 441 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441
10. I. D. Ivanović, J. Phys. A 14, 3241 (1981). 10.1088/0305-4470/14/ 12/019
11. W. K. Wootters and B. D. Fields, Ann. Phys. 191, 363 (1989). 10.1016/0003-4916(89)90322-9
12. A. Klappenecker and M. Roetteler, e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0309120.
13. A. O. Pittenger and M. H. Rubin, Linear Algebr. Appl. 390, 255 (2004). 10.1016/j.laa.2004.04.025
14. K. Życzkowski and I. Bengtsson, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 11, 3 (2004). 10.1023/B:OPSY.0000024753.05661.c2
15. R. B. Griffiths, S. Wu, L. Yu, and S. M. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 73, 052309 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.052309
16. S. Wu and X. Chen, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 782 (2007).
17. H. Maassen and J. B. M. Uffink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1103 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1103
18. M. J. W. Hall, Phys. Rev. A 55, 100 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.100
19. M. J. W. Hall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3307 (1995). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74. 3307
20. S. Wu, S. Yu, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. A 79, 022104 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.022104
21. M. A. Ballester and S. Wehner, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022319 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022319
22. In terms of upper bound, it is sufficient for Bob to use only rank-one POVM elements for the measurement since the mutual information will not decrease when Bob's POVM elements are refined into rank-one POVM elements. However, the nontrivial lower bound in the figure exists only when Bob's POVM elements are rank one.
23. J. Sánchez-Ruiz, Phys. Lett. A 201, 125 (1995). 10.1016/0375-9601(95)00219-S
24. J. Sánchez, Phys. Lett. A 173, 233 (1993). 10.1016/0375-9601(93) 90269-6
25. Inequality 28 is closely related to Eq. (78) in with a specified choice of the signal states, and we suspect that our analysis may also be generalized to derive results similar to Eq. (77) in for measurements on correlated pairs of particles.
26. R. B. Griffiths (unpublished).