Atrioventricular node anatomy and physiology: Implications for ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Current Opinion in Cardiology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 105-112

  Lee, Pi Chang ^a   Chen, Shih Ann ^a   Hwang, Betau ^a  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; Atrioventricular node

Indexed keywords

ATRIOVENTRICULAR JUNCTION ARRHYTHMIA; ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE REENTRANT TACHYCARDIA; CATHETER ABLATION; CHILDHOOD DISEASE; COMPLETE HEART BLOCK; CORONARY SINUS; CRYOABLATION; HEART ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE; HEART ATRIUM PACING; HEART ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HEART MUSCLE CONDUCTION SYSTEM; HIS BUNDLE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REENTRY TACHYCARDIA; REVIEW; SINUS RHYTHM; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TEMPERATURE;

ADULT; ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE; CATHETER ABLATION; CHILD; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES; HUMANS; TACHYCARDIA, ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL REENTRY;

EID: 62249117705     PISSN: 02684705     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328323d83f     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Lev M, Widran J, Erickson EE. A method for the histopathologic study of the atrioventricular node, bundle, and branches. AMA Arch Pathol 1951; 52:73-83.
2. Widran J, Lev M. The dissection of the atrioventricular node, bundle and bundle branches in the human heart. Circulation 1951; 4:863-867.
3. Hummel JD, Strickberger SA, Man KC, et al. Quantitative fluoroscopic comparison of the coronary sinus ostium in patients with and without AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1995; 6:681-686.
4. Ueng KC, Chen SA, Chiang CE, et al. Dimension and related anatomical distance of Koch's triangle in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996; 7:1017-1023.
5. Doig JC, Saito J, Harris L, et al. Coronary sinus morphology in patients with atrioventricular junctional reentry tachycardia and other supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Circulation 1995; 92:436-441.
6. Okumura Y, Watanabe I, Yamada T, et al. Comparison of coronary sinus morphology in patients with and without atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia by intracardiac echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004; 15:269-273.
7. Ong MG Y, Lee PC, Tai CT, et al. Coronary sinus morphology in different types of supraventricular tachycardia. J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol 2006; 15:21-26.
8. Anderson RH, Ho SY. The architecture of the sinus node, the atrioventricular conduction axis, and the internodal atrial myocardium. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998; 9:1233-1248.
9. McGuire MA, Robotin M, Yip AS, et al. Electrophysiologic and histologic effects of dissection of the connections between the atrium and posterior part of the atrioventricular node. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23:693-701.
10. Inoue S, Becker AE. Posterior extensions of the human compact atrioventricular node. Circulation 1998; 97:188-193.
11. Hwang C, Martin DJ, Goodman JS, et al. Atypical atrioventricular node reciprocating tachycardia masquerading as tachycardia using a left-sided accessory pathway. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30:218-225.
12. Gonzalez MD, Contreras LJ, Cardona F, et al. Demonstration of a left atrial input to the atrioventricular node in humans. Circulation 2002; 106:2930-2934.
13. Kilic A, Ali BA, Kose S, et al. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ablated from left atrial septum: clinical and electrophysiological characteristics and long-term follow-up results as compared to conventional right-sided ablation. Int Heart J 2005; 46:1023-1031.
14. Otomo K, Okamura H, Noda T, et al. "Left-variant" atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: electrophysiological characteristics and effect of slow pathway ablation within coronary sinus. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006; 17:1177-1183.
15. Nam GB, Rhee KS, Kim J, et al. Left atrionodal connections in typical and atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardias: activation sequence in the coronary sinus and results of radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006; 17:1-7.
16. Otomo K, Nagata Y, Uno K, et al. Atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with eccentric coronary sinus activation: electrophysiological characteristics and essential effects of left-sided ablation inside the coronary sinus. Heart Rhythm 2007; 4:421-432. This study elucidated the tachycardia characteristics and essential effects of left-sided ablation in AVNRT with eccentric coronary sinus activation.
17. Jais P, Haissaguerre M, Shah DC, et al. Successful radiofrequency ablation of a slow atrioventricular nodal pathway on the left posterior atrial septum. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22:525-527.
18. Sorbera C, Cohen M, Woolf P, et al. Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia: slow pathway ablation using the transseptal approach. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23:1343-1349.
19. Chen J, Anselme F, Smith TW, et al. Standard right atrial ablation is effective for atrioventricular nodal reentry with earliest activation in the coronary sinus. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004; 15:2-7.
20. Ong MGY, Lee PC, Tai CT, et al. The electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia with eccentric retrograde activation. Int J Cardiol 2007; 120:115-122. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of left sided retrograde atrial activation in a medical center, determine the specific electrophysiologic characteristics of eccentric and concentric atrial activation and determine the outcome of radio frequency catheter ablation for AVNRT with eccentric retrograde atrial activation.
21. Carlson J, Santos S, Platonov PG, et al. Left atrial conduction along the coronary sinus during ectopic atrial tachycardia and atrial fibrillation: a study using correlation function analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14:3148-3153.
22. Chauvin M, Shah DC, Haissaguerre M, et al. The anatomic basis of connections between the coronary sinus musculature and the left atrium in humans. Circulation 2000; 101:647-652.
23. Matthias A, Kenichiro O, Mauricio A. Electrical conduction between the right atrium and the left atrium via the musculature of the coronary sinus. Circulation 1998; 98:1790-1795.
24. Engelstein ED, Stein KM, Markowitz SM, et al. Posterior fast atrioventricular node pathways: implications for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27:1098-1105.
25. Lee PC, Tai CT, Lin YJ, et al. Noncontact three-dimensional mapping guides catheter ablation of difficult atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Int J Cardiol 2007; 118:154-163. The first study utilized the noncontact three-dimensional mapping to define the antegrade and retrograde AV nodal conduction, delineate the geometry of Koch's triangle and assess the electrophysiologic characteristics Inside and outside Koch's triangle, and guide the successful ablation of difficult AVNRT cases.
26. Chen SA, Chiang CE, Tsang WP, et al. Selective radiofrequency catheter ablation of fast and slow pathways in 100 patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Am Heart J 1993; 125:1-10.
27. Mazgalev TN, Tchou PJ. Surface potentials from the region of the atrioventricular node and their relation to dual pathway electrophysiology. Circulation 2000; 101:2110-2117.
28. Tai CT, Chen SA, Chiang CE, et al. Multiple antegrade atrioventricular node pathways in patients with atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:725-731.
29. McGuire MA, Bourke JP, Robotin MC, et al. High resolution mapping of Koch's triangle using sixty electrodes in humans with atrioventricular junctional (AV nodal) reentrant tachycardia. Circulation 1993; 88:2315-2328.
30. Hocini M, Loh P, Ho SY, et al. Anisotropic conduction in the triangle of Koch of mammalian hearts: electrophysiologic and anatomic correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:629-636.
31. McGuire MA, de Bakker JM, Vermeulen JT, et al. Atrioventricular junctional tissue. Discrepancy between histological and electrophysiological characteristics. Circulation 1996; 94:571-577.
32. Spach MS, Josephson ME. Initiating reentry: the role of nonuniform anisotropy in small circuits. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1994; 5:182-209.
33. Sanchez-Quintana D, Davies DW, Ho SY, et al. Architecture of the atrial musculature in and around the triangle of Koch: its potential relevance to atrioventricular nodal reentry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997; 8:1396-1407.
34. Belhassen B, Fish R, Glikson M, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of dual AV node physiology in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia by administration of adenosine-5-triphosphate during sinus rhythm. Circulation 1998; 98:47-53.
35. Tai CT, Chen SA, Chiang CE, et al. Complex electrophysiological characteristics in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with continuous atrioventricular node function curves. Circulation 1997; 95:2541-2547.
36. Posan E, Gula LJ, Skanes AC, et al. Characteristics of slow pathway conduction after successful AVNRT ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006; 17:847-851.
37. Kaltman JR, Rhodes LA, Wieand TS, et al. Slow pathway modification for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94:1316-1319.
38. Baker JH, Plumb VJ, Epstein AE, et al. PR/RR interval ratio during rapid atrial pacing: a simple method for confirming the presence of slow AV nodal pathway conduction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996; 7:287-294.
39. Sra JS, Jazayeri MR, Blanck Z, et al. Slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and a prolonged PR interval. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24:1064-1068.
40. Reithmann C, Hoffmann E, Grünewald A, et al. Fast pathway ablation in patients with common atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and prolonged PR interval during sinus rhythm. Eur Heart J 1998; 19:929-935.
41. Verdino RJ, Burke MC, Kall JG, et al. Retrograde fast pathway ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentry associated with markedly prolonged PR interval. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83:455-458.
42. Li YG, Grönefeld G, Bender B, et al. Risk of development of delayed atrioventricular block after slow pathway modification in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and a preexisting prolonged PR interval. Eur Heart J 2001; 22:89-95.
43. Lee SH, Chen SA, Tai CT, et al. Atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia in patients with a prolonged AH interval during sinus rhythm: clinical features, electrophysiologic characteristics and results of radiofrequency ablation. J Intervent Cardiac Electrophysiol 1997; 1:305-310.
44. Reithmann C, Remp T, Oversohl N, et al. Ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with a prolonged PR interval during sinus rhythm: the risk of delayed higher-degree atrioventricular block. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006; 17:973-979.
45. Pasquie JL, Scalzi J, Macia JC, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and preexisting prolonged PR interval. Europace 2006; 8:129-133.
46. Lee SH, Chen SA, Tai CT, et al. Atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia in patients with a long fast pathway effective refractory period: clinical features, electrophysiologic characteristics, and results of radiofrequency ablation. Am Heart J 1997; 134:387-394.
47. Man KC, Brinkman K, Bogun F, et al. 2:1 atrioventricular block during atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1770-1774.
48. Lee SH, Chen SA, Tai CT, et al. Electrophysiologic characteristics and radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia with second-degree atrioventricular block. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997; 8:502-511.
49. Lee SH, Tai CT, Chiang CE, et al. Spontaneous transition of 2:1 atrioventricular block to 1:1 atrioventricular conduction during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: evidence supporting the intra-Hisian or infra-Hisian area as the site of block. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14:1337-1341.
50. Otomo K, Suyama K, Okamura H, et al. Implications of 2:1 atrioventricular block during typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2007; 19:109-119. The purposes of this study were to localize the site of the 2:1 atrioventricular block during typical AVNRT, assess the effects of the 2:1 atrioventricular block during typical AVNRT on the tachycardia timing intervals, and localize the lower turn-around point of the reentrant circuit to assess if parts of the His bundle were involved in the reentrant circuit of the typical AVNRT.
51. Yagi T, Yang Y, Keung EC, et al. Significance of bundle branch block during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91:1184-1189.
52. Lee KT, Lee SH, Tai CT, et al. Effects of right bundle branch block during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Int J Cardiol 2005; 101:91-95.
53. Lee PC, Hwang B, Tai CT, et al. The specific electrophysiologic characteristics in children with the atypical forms of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Cardiology 2007; 108:351-357. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics in pediatric patients with the atypical forms of AVNRT.
54. Tai CT, Chen SA, Chiang CE, et al. Electrophysiologic characteristics and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with multiple atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardias. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77:52-58.
55. Otomo K, Nagata Y, Taniguchi H, et al. Superior type of atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia: incidence, characteristics, and effect of slow pathway ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008; 31:998-1009. The study characterized atypical AVNRT with the eccentric retrograde atrial activation at the right superior septum.
56. Lee PC, Tai CT, Hwang BT, et al. The electrophysiologic characteristics in patients with only ventricular-pacing inducible slow-fast form atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol 2005; 14:153-157.
57. Lee PC, Hwang B, Tai CT, et al. The electrophysiological characteristics in patients with ventricular stimulation inducible fast-slow form atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006; 29:1105-1111.
58. Hatzinikolaou H, Rodriguez LM, Smeets JL, et al. Isoprenaline and inducibility of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia. Heart 1998; 79:165-168.
59. Yu WC, Chen SA, Chiang CE, et al. Effects of isoproterenol in facilitating induction of slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78:1299-1302.
60. Hsieh MH, Chen SA, Tai CT, et al. Absence of junctional rhythm during successful slow-pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation 1998; 98:2296-2300.
61. Liberman L, Hordof AJ, Pass RH, et al. Rapid atrial pacing: a useful technique during slow pathway ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007; 30: 221-224. The study described a technique to ensure normal antegrade AV node function during junctional rhythm at the time of RF catheter ablation of the slow pathway.
62. Strickberger SA, Zivin A, Daoud EG, et al. Temperature and impedance monitoring during slow pathway ablation in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996; 7:295-300.
63. Strickberger SA, Daoud EG, Weiss R, et al. A randomized comparison of fixed power and temperature monitoring during slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Intervent Cardiac Electrophysiol 1997; 1:299-303.
64. Willems S, Weiss C, Hofmann T, et al. Subthreshold stimulation in the region of the slow pathway during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: correlation with effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29:408-415.
65. Willems S, Rostock T, Shenasa M, et al. Sub-threshold stimulation in variants of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: electrophysiological effects and impact for guidance of slow pathway ablation. Eur Heart J 2004; 25:1249-1256.
66. Delise P, Bonso A, Cora L, et al. Pacemapping of the triangle of Koch: a simple method to reduce the risk of atrioventricular block during radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001; 24:1725-1731.
67. Delise P, Sitta N, Bonso A, et al. Pace mapping of Koch's triangle reduces risk of atrioventricular block during ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005; 16:30-35.
68. Lemola K, Dubuc M, Khairy P, et al. Transcatheter cryoablation part II: clinical utility. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008; 31:235-244. The review article demonstrated the clinical utility of transcatheter cryoablation.
69. Skanes AC, Klein G, Krahn A, et al. Cryoablation: potentials and pitfalls. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004; 15:528-334.
70. Skanes AC, Dubuc M, Klein G, et al. Cryothermal ablation of the slow pathway for the elimination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation 2000; 102:2856-2860.
71. Khairy P, Novak PG, Guerra PG, et al. Cryothermal slow pathway modification for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Europace 2007; 9:901-914. The study demonstrated the result and follow-up of cryothermal slow pathway modification for AVNRT.
72. Zrenner B, Dong J, Schreieck J, et al. Transvenous cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a prospective randomized pilot study. Eur Heart J 2004; 25:2226-2231.
73. Collins KK, Dubin AM, Chiesa NA, et al. Cryoablation versus ablation for treatment of pediatric atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Initial experience with 4-mm cryocatheter. Heart Rhythm 2006; 3:564-570.
74. Goldberg CS, Caplan MJ, Heidelberger KP, et al. The dimensions of the triangle of Koch in children. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83:117-120.
75. Lee PC, Chen SA, Chiang CE, et al. Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics in children with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Ped Cardiol 2003; 24:6-9.
76. Blurton DJ, Dubin AM, Chiesa NA, et al. Characterizing dual atrioventricular nodal physiology in pediatric patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006; 17:638-644.
77. Lee PC, Hwang B, Tai CT, et al. The different ablation effects on atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children with and without dual nodal pathways. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006; 29:600-606.
78. Lee PC, Hwang B, Chen SA, et al. The results of radiofrequency catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in children. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007; 30:655-661. This study demonstrated that the radio frequency catheter ablation was a well tolerated and effective method to manage children with paroxysmal and incessant tachycardia, and the substrates of the arrhythmias differed between the pediatric and adult patients.