A novel online Food Recall Checklist for use in an undergraduate student population: A comparison with diet diaries

Nutrition Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Comrie, Fiona ^a   Masson, Lindsey F ^a   McNeill, Geraldine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYSACCHARIDE;

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; BREAD; CALORIC INTAKE; CEREAL; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIET; FAT INTAKE; FEMALE; FOOD RECALL CHECKLIST; FRUIT; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; VEGETABLE; ADOLESCENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; ONLINE SYSTEM; RECALL; STATISTICS; STUDENT; UNITED KINGDOM; UNIVERSITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; DIET; DIET RECORDS; DIET SURVEYS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; ONLINE SYSTEMS; SCOTLAND; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 62149148865     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14752891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-8-13     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Changes in food habits in healthy Swedish adolescents during the transition from adolescence to adulthood. M Von Post-Skagegard G Samuelson B Karlstrom R Mohsen L Berglund LE Bratteby, Eur J Clin Nutr 2002 56 6 532 538 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601345 12032653
2. Gender differences in chronic disease risk behaviors through the transition out of high school. KW Cullen LM Koehly C Anderson T Baranowski A Prokhorov K Basen-Engquist D Wetter A Hergenroender, Am J Prev Med 1999 17 1 1 7 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00038-0 10429746
3. Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking, physical activity, and food choice behaviors. SH Kelder CL Perry KI Klepp LL Lytle, Am J Public Health 1994 84 7 1121 1126 8017536 10.2105/AJPH.84.7.1121
4. Healthy eating: what does it mean to adolescents? JK Croll D Neumark-Sztainer M Story, J Nutr Educ 2001 33 4 193 198 10.1016/S1499-4046(06) 60031-6 11953240
5. A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. W Kroeze A Werkman J Brug, Ann Behav Med 2006 31 3 205 223 10.1207/s15324796abm3103- 216700634
6. Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines. S Eaker R Bergstrom A Bergstrom HO Adami O Nyren, Am J Epidemiol 1998 147 1 74 82 9440402
7. Rates and determinants of repeated participation in a web-based behavior change program for healthy body weight and healthy lifestyle. MW Verheijden MP Jans VH Hildebrandt M Hopman-Rock, J Med Internet Res 2007 9 1 17478410
8. Mobile phone short message service messaging for behaviour modification in a community-based weight control programme in Korea. NS Joo BT Kim, J Telemed Telecare 2007 13 8 416 420 10.1258/135763307783064331 18078554
9. Development of a New Instrument for Evaluating Individuals' Dietary Intakes. D- Wang M Kogashiwa S Kira, J Am Diet Assoc 2006 106 10 1588 1593 10.1016/j.jada.2006.07.004 17000191
10. Testing the usability of two automated home-based patient-management systems. R Farzanfar J Finkelstein RH Friedman, J Med Syst 2004 28 2 143 153 10.1023/B:JOMS.0000023297.50379.3c 15195845
11. Access to Health Information and Support A Public Highway or a Private Road? TR Eng A Maxfield K Patrick MJ Deering SC Ratzan DH Gustafson, JAMA 1998 280 15 1371 1375 10.1001/jama.280.15.1371 9794322
12. Feedback strategies to raise awareness of personal dietary intake: results of a randomized controlled trial. A Oenema J Brug, Prev Med 2003 36 4 429 439 10.1016/S0091-7435(02)00043-9 12649051
13. National Statistics Online, First Release: Internet Access 2007. Households and Individuals 2007 1
14. DoH (UK Department of Health), Dietary Reference Values for Food Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom: Report of the Panel on Dietary Reference Values of the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy Norwich: The Stationery Office for Her Majesty's Stationery Office 1 1991
15. The Scottish Office Department of Health, Eating for Health: A Diet Action Plan for Scotland 1996
16. DINER (Data Into Nutrients for Epidemiological Research) - a new data-entry program for nutritional analysis in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort and the 7-day non-weighed record method. AA Welch A McTaggart AA Mulligan R Luben N Walker KT Khaw NE Day SA Bingham, Public Health Nutr 2001 4 6 1253 1265 10.1079/PHN2001196 11796089
17. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: Weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. SA Bingham C Gill A Welch K Day A Cassidy KT Khaw MJ Sneyd TJA Key L Roe NE Day, British Journal of Nutrition 1994 72 4 619 643 10.1079/BJN19940064 7986792
18. Statistical approaches for assessing the relative validity of a food-frequency questionnaire: use of correlation coefficients and the kappa statistic. LF Masson G McNeill JO Tomany JA Simpson HS Peace L Wei DA Grubb C Bolton-Smith, Public Health Nutr 2003 6 3 313 321 10.1079/PHN2002429 12740081
19. Food photography. I: The perception of food portion size from photographs. M Nelson M Atkinson S Darbyshire, Br J Nutr 1994 72 5 649 663 10.1079/BJN19940069 7826990
20. Food Standards Agency, Institute of Food Research, McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry 6 2002
21. Food Standards Agency, Food Portion Sizes London: Food Standards Agency Third 2002
22. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. JM Bland DG Altman, Lancet 1986 1 8476 307 310 2868172
23. L Henderson J Gregory K Irving G Swan, The National Diet & Nutrition Survey: adults aged 19 to 64 years, Energy, protein, carbohydrate, fat and alcohol intake 2003 2
24. Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: comparison of 7 d diet non-weighed record and food-frequency questionnaire and validity against biomarkers. E Brunner D Stallone M Juneja S Bingham M Marmot, Brit J Nutr 2001 86 3 405 414 10.1079/BJN2001414 11570993
25. Among young adults, college students and graduates practiced more healthful habits and made more healthful food choices than did nonstudents. CC Georgiou NM Betts SL Hoerr K Keim PK Peters B Stewart J Voichick, J Am Diet Assoc 1997 97 7 754 759 10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00187-9 9216552
26. Dietary assessment of an educated young Spanish population using a self-administered meal-based food frequency questionnaire. G Fregapane C Asensio-Garciìa, Eur J Epidemiol 2000 16 2 183 191 10.1023/A: 1007630521750 10845270
27. Validation of a brief diet survey instrument among medical students. EH Spencer LK Elon VS Hertzberg AD Stein E Frank, J Am Diet Assoc 2005 105 5 802 806 10.1016/j.jada.2005.02.003 15883560
28. Commentary on quantifying agreement between two methods of measurement [5]. DG Altman JM Bland, Clin Chem 2002 48 5 801 802
29. Assessing dietary intake: who, what and why of under-reporting. J Macdiarmid J Blundell, Nutr Res Rev 1998 11 2 231 253 10.1079/NRR19980017 19094249
30. M Nelson M Atkinson J Meyer, A Photographic Atlas of Food Portion Sizes London: MAFF Publications 1997
31. An overview of USDA's Dietary Intake Data System. N Raper B Perloff L Ingwersen L Steinfeldt J Anand, J Food Compos Anal 2004 17 3-4 545 555 10.1016/j.jfca.2004.02.013