Parameter extrapolation to ungauged basins with a hydrological distributed model in a regional framework

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 229-246

  Velez J J ^a,b   Puricelli, M ^a   Lopez Unzu F ^c   Frances F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^c Intecsa Inarsa SA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DISCHARGE; DRAINAGE; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; GAUGE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; OUTFLOW; PARAMETERIZATION; RUNOFF; WATER RESOURCE; WATERSHED;

BASQUE COUNTRY; EURASIA; EUROPE; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

EID: 62149136928     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-13-229-2009     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abbaspour, K. C. and Moon, D. E.: Relationships between conventional field information and some soil properties measured in the laboratory, Geoderma, 55, 119-140, 1992.
2. Andersen, J., Refsgaard, J. C., and Jensen, K. H.: Distributed hydrological modelling of the Senegal River basin - model construction and validation, J. Hydrol., 247, 200-214, 2001.
3. Bárdossy, A.: Calibration of hydrological parameters for ungauged catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 11, 703-710, 2007.
4. Beven, K.: Changing ideas in hydrology - The case of physicallybased models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157-172, 1989.
5. Beven, K.: Rainfal-runoff modelling. The Primer, John Wiley and sons Ltd. Chichester, UK, Chap. 7, 21-254, 2000.
6. Beven, K. and Binley A.: The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279-298, 1992.
7. Boer, M., Del Barrio, G., and Puigdefábregas, J.: Mapping soil depth classes in dry Mediterranean areas using terrain attributes derived from a digital elevation model, Geoderma, 72, 99-118, 1996.
8. Bolstad, P. V., Swank, W., and Vose, J.: Predicting Southern Appalachian overstory vegetation with digital terrain data, Landscape Ecology, 13, 271-283, 1998
9. Boyle, D. P., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Toward improved calibration of hydrologie models: Combining the strenghts of manual and automatic calibration, Water Resour. Res., 36(12), 3663-3674, 2000.
10. Daly, C., Nielson, R. P., and Philips, D. L.: A statistical topographic model mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain, J. Appl. Meteorol., 33, 140-158, 1994.
11. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K.:Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 24(7), 1163-1173, 1992.
12. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K.: Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models, J. Hydrol., 158, 265-284, 1994.
13. Duckstein, L., Ambrus, S., and Davis, R. D.: Management forecasting requirements, in: Hydrological forecasting, edited by: Anderson, M. G. and Burt, T. P., John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chap. 16, 559-585, 1985.
14. Eckhardt, K. and Arnold, J. G.: Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model, Technical Note, J. Hydrol., 251, 103-109, 2001.
15. Francés, F., Vélez, J. I., and Vélez. J.J.: Split-parameter structure for the automatic calibration of distributed hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 332, 226-240, 2007.
16. Freer, J., Beven, K., and Ambroise, B.: Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: An application to the GLUE approach, Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2161-2173, 1996.
17. Gan, T. Y. and Biftu, G. F.: Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Optimization algorithms, catchment conditions, and model structure, Water Resour. Res., 32(12), 35133524, 1996.
18. Gan, T. Y. and Burges, S. J.: An assessment of a conceptual rainfallrunoff model's ability to represent the dinamics of small hypothetical catchments 1. Models, model properties, and experimental design, Water Resour. Res., 26(7), 1595-1604, 1990.
19. Grayson, R. B., Moore, I. A., and McMahon, T. A.: Physically based hydrologic modeling 2. Is the concept realistic?, Water Resour. Res., 26(10), 2659-2666, 1992.
20. Heuvelmans G., Muys, B., and Feyen, J.: Analysis of the spatial variation in the parameters of the SWAT model with application in Flanders, Northern Belgium, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 8(5), 931-939, 2004.
21. INTECSA-INARSA-UPV: Estudio de evaluación de los recursos hídricos totales en el ámbito de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco, Final technical, report, Dirección de Aguas del Gobierno Vasco, 2004.
22. Klemeš, V.: Operational testing of hydrological simulation models, Hydrol. Sci. J., 31, 13-24, 1986.
23. Klemeš, V.: A hydrological perspective, J. Hydrol., 100, 3-28, 1988.
24. Kothyari, U. C. and Singh, V. P.: A multiple-input single-output model for flow forecasting, J. Hydrol, 220, 12-26, 1999.
25. Leopold, L. B. Wolman, M. G., and Miller, J. P.: Fluvial processes in geomorphology, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, USA, 1964.
26. Lidén, R. and Harlin, J.: Analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling performance in different climates, J. Hydrol., 238, 231-247, 2000.
27. Madsen, H.: Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives, J. Hydrol., 235, 276-288, 2000.
28. McDonnell, J. J., Sivapalan, M., Vaché, K., Dunn, S., Grant, G., Haggerty, R., Hinz, C., Hooper, R., Kirchner, J., Roderick, M.L., Selker, J., and Weiler, M.: Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 43, W07301, doi:10.1029/ 2006WR005467, 2007.
29. McKenzie, N. J. and Austin, M. P.: A quantitative Australian approach to medium and small scale surveys based on soil stratigraphy and environmental correlation, Geoderma, 57, 329-355, 1993.
30. Montgomery, D. C. and Runger, G. C.: Probabilidad y Estadística Aplicadas a la Ingeniería. Mc Graw-Hill. México, 1996.
31. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models. I. A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290, 1970.
32. Puricelli, M.: Estimación y distribución de parámetros del suelo para la modelación hidrológica, Doctoral Thesis, Technical University of Valencia, DIHMA, p. 435, 2003.
33. Refsgaard, J. C. and Knudsen, J.: Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models, Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2189-2202, 1996.
34. Schaake, J. C.: Introduction, in: Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by: Duan Q., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A. N., and Turcotte, R., Water Science and Applications Series Vol 6. AGU, 1-9, 2003.
35. Senarath, S., Ogden, F. L., Downer, C. W. and. Sharif, H. O.: On the calibration and verification of two-dimentional distributed, Hortonian, continuous watershed models, Water Resour. Res., 36(6), 1495-1510, 2000.
36. Singh, V. P.: Hydrologie systems. Watershed modeling, Prentice Hall Inc., Vol. II., New Jersey, USA., Chap. 12-14, 237-259, 1989.
37. Sivapalan, M., Takeuchi, K., Franks, S. W., Gupta, V. K., Karambiri, H., Lakshmi, V., Liang, X., McDonnell, J., Mendiondo, E.M., O'Connell, P. E., Oki, T., Pomeroy, J. W., Schertzer, D., Uhlenbrook, S., and Zehe, E.: IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003-2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences. Hydrological Sciences, Journal des Sciences Hydrologiques, 48(6), 857-880, 2003.
38. Sorooshian, S., Duan, Q., and Gupta, V. K.: Sthocastic parameter estimation procedures for hydrologic rainfall-runoff models: Correlated and Heteroscedastic error cases, Water Resour. Res., 29(4), 1185-1194, 1993.
39. Tang Y., Reed P., and Wagener, T.: How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model calibration?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10(2), 289-307, 2006.
40. Thyer, M., Kuczera, G., and Bates, B. C.: Probabilistic optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models: A comparison of the Shuffled complex evolution and simulated annealing algorithms, Water Resour. Res., 35(3), 767-773, 1999.
41. Vêlez, J. I.: Desarrollo de un modelo hidrológico conceptual y distribuido orientado a la simulación de las crecidas, Doctoral Thesis, Technical University of Valencia, DIHMA, p. 266, 2001.
42. Vêlez, J. J.; Vêlez J. I., and Francés, F.: Simulación hidrológica de crecidas en grandes cuencas mediante el uso de la modelación distribuida, In congress: 3 Asamblea Hispano-Portuguesa de Geodesia y Geofísica. Ed. UPV, Valencia, Spain. 7-8 February, 1682-1687, 2002a
43. Vélez, J. I., Vélez J. J., and Francés, F.: Modelo distribuido para la simulación hidrológica de crecidas en grandes cuencas, In congress: XX Congreso Latinoamericano de Hidráulica, La Habana, Cuba. October. ISBN 959-7160-17-X. 2002b.
44. Vélez J.J., López, F., Francés, F.: Calibration Strategy For Hydrological Distributed Conceptual Models. In congress: IUGG XXIV General Assembly, "Earth: our changing planet", IAHS-PUB session HW2005: From Measurements and Calibration to Understanding and Predictions. Perugia, Italy, 2-13 July, http://www.iugg2007perugia.it/abstracttype.asp. 2007.
45. Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Dekker S. C., Sorooshian, S., Wagener, T., and Bouten, W.: Application of stochastic parameter optimization to the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting model, J. Hydrol, 325, 288-307, 2006.
46. Wagener, T., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V.: Rainfall-runoff modelling in gauged and ungauged catchments. London : Imperial College Press, p. 306, 2004.
47. Wood, E. F., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., and Band, L.: Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modelling, J. Hydrol, 102, 29-47, 1988.
48. Yapo, P. O., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data, J. Hydrol, 181, 23-48, 1996.
49. Yapo, P. O., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models, J. Hydrol, 204, 83-98, 1998.