Randomized benchmarking of single- and multi-qubit control in liquid-state NMR quantum information processing

New Journal of Physics

Volumn 11, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Ryan, C A ^a   Laforest, M ^a   Laflamme, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b PERIMETER INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; CONCURRENCY CONTROL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY;

AVERAGE ERRORS; COHERENT CONTROLS; CONTROL HARDWARES; DECOHERENCE; ERROR MODELS; ERROR RATES; FAULT-TOLERANT; FIDELITY DECAYS; LIQUID STATE; QUANTUM CONTROLS; QUANTUM INFORMATIONS; QUANTUM-INFORMATION PROCESSING; TWO-QUBIT GATES;

QUANTUM OPTICS;

EID: 62149136897     PISSN: 13672630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/1/013034     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Preskill J 1998 Reliable quantum computers Proc. R. Soc. A 454 385 410
2. Isaac L Chuang and Nielsen M A 1997 Prescription for experimental determination of the dynamics of a quantum black box J. Mod. Opt. 44 2455-67
3. Boulant N, Havel T F, Pravia M A and Cory D G 2003 Robust method for estimating the lindblad operators of a dissipative quantum process from measurements of the density operator at multiple time points Phys. Rev. A 67 042322
4. Emerson J, Weinstein Y S, Saraceno M, Lloyd S and Cory D G Pseudo-random unitary operators for quantum information processing Science 302 2098 100
5. Emerson J, Silva M, Moussa O, Ryan C, Laforest M, Baugh J, Cory D G and Laflamme R 2007 Symmetrized characterization of noisy quantum processes Science 317 1893 6
6. Lopez C C, Levi B and Cory D G 2008 Error characterization in quantum information processing: a protocol for analyzing spatial correlations and its experimental implementation arXiv:0805.4825
7. Emerson J, Alicki R and Zyczkowski K 2005 Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 7 S347-52
8. DiVincenzo D P, Leung D W and Terhal B M 2002 Quantum data hiding IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 48 580 98
9. Dankert C, Cleve R, Emerson J and Livine E 2006 Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs: Constructions and applications arXiv:quant-ph/0606161vl
10. Aaronson S and Gottesman D 2004 Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits Phys. Rev. A 70 052328
11. Harrow A and Low R 2008 Random quantum circuits are approximate 2-designs arXiv:0802.1919v1
12. Knill E, Leibfried D, Reichte R, Britton J, Blakestad R B, Jost J D, Langer C, Ozeri R, Seidelin S and Wineland D J 2008 Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates Phys. Rev. A 77 012307
13. Negrevergne C, Mahesh T S, Ryan C A, Ditty M, Cyr-Racine F, Power W, Boulant N, Havel T, Cory D G and Laflamme R 2006 Benchmarking quantum control methods on a 12-qubit system Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 170501
14. Vandersypen LMK, Steffen M, Breyta G, Yannoni C S, Sherwood M H and Chuang I L 2001 Experimental realization of shor's quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance Nature 414 883-7
15. Ryan C A, Negrevergne C, Laforest M, Knill E and Laflamme R 2008 Liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance as a testbed for developing quantum control methods Phys. Rev. A 78 012328
16. Timothy F Havel 2003 Robust procedures for converting among lindblad, kraus and matrix representations of quantum dynamical semigroups J. Math. Phys. 44 534-57
17. Bravyi S and Kitaev A 2005 Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas Phys. Rev. A 71 022316
18. Knill E 2005 Scalable quantum computing in the presence of large detected-error rates Phys. Rev. A 71 042322
19. Aliferis P, Gottesman D and Preskill J 2006 Quantum accuracy threshold for concatenated distance-3 codes Quantum Inf. Comput. 6 97-165
20. Knill E 2005 Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices Nature 434 39-44
21. Wimperis S 1994 Broadband, narrowband, and passband composite pulses for use in advanced NMR experiments/ Magn. Reson. A 109 221
22. Li Xiao and Jones J A 2006 Robust logic gates and realistic quantum computation Phys. Rev. A 73 032334
23. Cummins H K, Llewellyn G and Jones J A 2003 Tackling systematic errors in quantum logic gates with composite rotations Phys. Rev. A 67 042308
24. Henry M K, Gorshkov A V, Weinstein Y S, Cappellaro P, Emerson J, Boulant N, Hodges J S, Ramanathan C, Havel T F, Martinez R and Cory D G 2007 Signatures of incoherence in a quantum information processor Quantum Inf. Process. 6 431-44
25. Kobzar K, Skinner T E, Khaneja N, Glaser S J and Luy B 2004 Exploring the limits of broadband excitation and inversion pulses J. Magn. Reson. 170 236-43
26. Knill E, Laflamme R, Martinez R and Tseng C-H 2000 An algorithmic benchmark for quantum information processing Nature 404 368-70
27. Khaneja N, Reiss T, Kehlet C, Schulte-Herbruggen T and Glaser S J 2005 Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of nmr pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms J. Magn. Reson. 172 296 305
28. Skinner T E, Reiss T O, Luy B, Khaneja N and Glaser S J 2004 Reducing the duration of broadband excitation pulses using optimal control with limited rf amplitude J. Magn. Reson. 167 68-74
29. Levi B, López C C, Emerson J and Cory D G 2007 Efficient error characterization in quantum information processing Phys. Rev. A 75 022314
30. Viola L and Knill E 2005 Random decoupling schemes for quantum dynamical control and error suppression Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 060502