The first 20 years of drug treatment courts: A brief description of their history and impact

Federal Probation

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 13-17

  Lurigio, Arthur J ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62149105176     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. American University. (2007). Drug court ac- tivity update: April 12. 2(X)7. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, Drug Court Clearing House.
2. Belenko. S. (1998). Research on drug courts: A critical review. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. Columbia University.
3. Belenko. S. (1999). Research on drug courts: A critical review 1999 update. New York: National Center on Addiction and Sub- stance Abuse, Columbia University.
4. Belenko, S, (2001). Reseatvh on drug courts: A critical review 2001 update. New York: National Center on Addiction and Sub- stance Abuse, Columbia University.
5. Belenko, S. & Dumanovsky, T. (1993). Pro- gram brief: Special drug courts. Wash- ington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice.
6. Belenko, S.. Fagan, J. A" & Dumanovsky, T. (1994). The effects of legal sanctions on recidivism in special drug courts. The Justice System Journal, 17, 53-82.
7. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2002). Drugs and crime facts: Drug law violations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
8. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. (2007). Drug treatment courts: FAQs. Ottawa: Author.
9. Cooper. C.S. (1998). 1998 Drug court survey: Preliminary findings. Washington, DC: Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project, American University.
10. Cooper, C.S. & Trotter. J. (1994) Recent de- velopments in drug case management: Reengineering the judicial process. Jus- tice System Journal, 17, 83-98.
11. Davis. R. C, Smith, B. E.. & Lurigio. A. J. (1994). Court strategies to cope with ris- ing drug case loads. The Justice System Journal, 17. 1-18.
12. Drug Courts Program Office. (1997). Defin- ing drug courts: The key components. Washington. DC: Office of Justice Pro- grams.
13. Drug Strategies. (1999). Drug courts: A revo- lution in criminal justice. Washington, DC: Author.
14. Deschenes, E. P.. Turner. S., Greenwood, P., & Chiesa, J. (1996). An experimental evalua- tion of drug testing and treatment interven- tions for probationers in Maricopa County. Arizona. Santa Monica. CA: Rand.
15. Finn. P. & Newlyn, A.K. (1993). Miami's Drug Court: A different approach. Wash- ington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Na- tional Institute of Justice, Department of Justice.
16. Finigin, M. W. & Carey, S.M. (2002). Analy- sis of 26 drug courts: Lessons learned fi- nal report. Washington, DC: National In- stitute of Justice. Department of Justice.
17. Florida's Eleventh Judicial Circuit (2007). Miami Dade County Drug Court, http:// www.jud 11 .flcourts.org/programs and services/drug court.htm. Retrieved No- vember 28,2007.
18. Fulton-Hora, P. (2002). A dozen years of drug treatment courts: Uncovering our theo- retical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm. Substance Use and Misuse, 37, 1469-1488.
19. General Accounting Office. (1997). Drug courts: Overview of growth, characteris- tics, and results. Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Of- fice.
20. Goldcamp, J.S., & Weiland, D. (1993). As- sessing the impact of Dade County's Felony Drug Court: Executive summary. Philadelphia: Crime and Justice Institute.
21. Gottfredson, D.C. & Ex um, M. L. (2002). The Baltimore City Drug Court: One-year re- sults from a randomized study. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency. 39. 337-356.
22. Gottfredson, D.C, Najaka, S.S., & Kearley. B. (2003). Effectiveness of drug treat- ment courts: Evidence from a random- ized trial. Criminology and Public Policy. 2, 171-196.
23. Harrison, P.M. & Beck. AJ. (2006). Prison- ers in 2005. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice.
24. Harrison, P. M., & Beek. A.J. (2005). Prison- ers in 2(KM. Washington. DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice.
25. Hennessy, J.J. (2001). Introduction: Drug courts in operation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 33, I -10.
26. Inciardi, J.A., McBride. D.C, & Rivers, J.E. (1996). Drug control and the courts. Thou- sand Oaks, CA; Sage Publications.
27. Longshore, D., Turner, S., Wenzel, S., Morral, A., Harrell, A, McBride, D.. et al. (2001). Drug courts: A conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 7-26.
28. MacKenzie, D.L. (1997). Criminal justice and crime prevention in Sherman, L.W., D. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter, S. Bushway. Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's prom- ising, Washington, DC: A Report to the U.S. Congress prepared by National In- stitute of Justice.
29. Marlowe, D.B. & Festίnger. D.S. (2000). Re- search on drug courts: Do the N's justify the means? Connection, 12, 4-5
30. Peters, R.H., Haas, A.L., & Hunt, W.M. (2001). Treatment dosage effects in drug court programs. Journal of Offender Re- habilitation, 33,63-72.
31. Peters R.H., & Murrin. MR. (2000). Effec- tiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Beluivior, 27,72-96.
32. Mugford, R" & Weekes, J. (2006). Manda- tory and coerced treatment: Fact sheet. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
33. Santa Clara County, California Drug Court. (1998). Santa Clara County Drug Treat- ment Court: Two-year progress report and outcome comparisons. Santa Clara County, CA: Santa Clara County, Califor- nia Drug Treatment Court.
34. Slobogin, C. (1995). Therapeutic jurispru- dence: Five dilemmas to ponder. Psychol- ogy, Public Policy and Law, 1, 193-219.
35. Smith. B.E., Lurigio, A.J., Davis, R.C, El- stein, S., Goretsky-Elstein, S.. & Popkin. S.J. (1994). The Justice System Journal, 17, 41-52.
36. Tonry, M. (1999). Why are incarceration rates so high? Overcrowded Times, 10, 3-6.
37. Vigdal, G.L. (1995). Planning for alcohol and other drug abuse treatment for adults in the criminal justice system. Treatment Improvement Protocol Series. Publica- tion no. 17. Rockville, MD: U.S. De- partment of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administra- tion, Center for Substance.
38. Wexler, D. (1992). Putting mental health into mental health law. Law and Human Be- havior, 16, 27-38.
39. Wexler. D. (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence: An overview. Disability Law Symposium Issue: Legal and Treatment Issues. Thom- as M. Cooley Law Review 17, 125-134.
40. Wexler, D. & Winick, B.J. (1996). (Eds.) Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
41. White House. (2004). National drug control strategy update, March 2004. Washing- ton, DC: Author.