Subjective Experience of image quality: Attributes, definitions and decision making of subjective image quality

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 7242, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Leisti, Tuomas ^a   Radun, Jenni ^a   Virtanen, Toni ^a   Halonen, Raisa ^b   Nyman, Göte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Decision making; Experience; Ink jet printing; Printing paper; Subjective image quality

Indexed keywords

DECISION-MAKING PROCESS; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEMS; IMAGE CONTENTS; INK-JET PRINTING; INK-JET PRINTS; MEAN RATINGS; PRINTING PAPER; QUALITY RATINGS; SUBJECTIVE IMAGE QUALITY; SUBJECTIVE QUALITIES; SUBJECTIVE QUALITY RATINGS;

DECISION MAKING; INK; JETS; PAPER; PRINTING;

IMAGE QUALITY;

EID: 62149102589     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.807142     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Eckert, M. P. and Bradley, A. P., "Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression", Signal Process., 70, 177-200 (1998).
2. To, M., Lovell, P. G., Troscianko, T. and Tolhurst, D. J., "Summation of perceptual cues in natural visual scenes", Proc. R. Soc. B, 275, 2299-308 (2008).
3. Hochstein, S. and Ahissari, M., "View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system," Neuron, 36, 791-804 (2002).
4. Radun, J., Leisti T., Nyman, G., Häkkinen J., ,Ojanen, H., Olives, J.-L. and Vuori, T., "Content and quality: Interpretation-based estimation of image quality," ACM Trans. Appl. Percept, 4, 21:1-21:15 (2008).
5. Keelan, B. W., [Handbook of Image Quality], Marcel Dekker, New York (2002)
6. Janssen, T. J. W. M. and Blommaert, F. J. J., "Image quality semantics," J. Imaging Sci. Techn., 41, 555-560 (1997).
7. Kim, Y. J., Luo, M. R., Choe, W., Kim, H. S., Park, S. O., Baek, Y., Rhodes, P., Lee S. and Kim C. Y., "Factors affecting the psychophysical image quality evaluation of mobile phone displays: the case of transmissive liquid-crystal displays," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 25, 2215-2222 (2008).
8. Nyman, G., Radun, J., Leisti, T. and Vuori, T., "From image fidelity to subjective quality: A hybrid qualitative/quantitative methodology for measuring subjective image quality for different image contents," in Proc. 12th International Display Workshops (IDW '05), pp. 1825-1828 (2005)
9. Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F. and Payne, J. W., "Constructive consumer choice processes", J. Consum. Res., 25, 187-217 (1998)
10. Oittinen, P., Halonen, R., Kokkonen A., Leisti T., ,Nyman G., Eerola, T., Lensu L., Kälviäinen H.,Ritala, R., Pulla, J. and Mettänen, M., "Framework for modeling visual printed image quality from the paper perspective." in Proc. IS&T/SPIE International Symposium on Electronic Imaging 2008: Imaging Quality and System Performance V (2008).
11. Bracken, C., "Presence and image quality: The case of high-definition television", Media Psychol., 7, 191-205 (2005).
12. McGlone, M., Kobrynowics, D. and Alexander, R., "A certain je ne sais quoi: Verbalization bias in evaluation," Hum. Commun. Res., 31, 241-267 (2005).