Multisensory processing and neural oscillatory responses: Separation of visuotactile congruency effect and corresponding electroencephalogram activities

NeuroReport

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 289-293

  Kanayama, Noriaki ^a,b   Ohira, Hideki ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

band activity; band activity; Congruency effect; Multisensory interaction; Time frequency analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDEX FINGER; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESSING; REACTION TIME; SENSORY STIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TACTILE STIMULATION; THUMB; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADOLESCENT; BIOLOGICAL CLOCKS; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TOUCH; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 62149087890     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328322ca63     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Pavani F, Spence C, Driver J. Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychol Sci 2000; 11:353-359.
2. Maravita A, Spence C, Sergent C, Driver J. Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interactions. Psychol Sci 2002; 13:350-356.
3. Tipper SP, Lloyd D, Shorland B, Dancer C, Howard LA, McGlone F. Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting. Neuroreport 1998; 9:1741-1744.
4. Tipper SP, Phillips N, Dancer C, Lloyd D, Howard LA, McGlonel F. Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly. Exp Brain Res 2001; 139:160-167.
5. Pavani F, Castiello U. Binding personal and extrapersonal space through body shadows. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7:14-16.
6. Balslev D, Nielsen FA, Paulson OB, Law I. Right temporoparietal cortex activation during visuo-proprioceptive conflict. Cereb Cortex 2005; 15:166-169.
7. Bremmer F, Schlack A, Shah NJ, Zafiris O, Kubischik M, Hoffmann K, et al. Polymodal motion processing in posterior parietal and premotor cortex: a human fMRI study strongly implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron 2001; 29:287-296.
8. Macaluso E, Driver J. Spatial attention and crossmodal interactions between vision and touch. Neuropsychologia 2001 ; 39:1304-1 31 6.
9. Macaluso E, Frith CD, Driver J. Multimodal mechanisms of attention related to rates of spatial shifting in vision and touch. Exp Brain Res 2001 ; 137:445-454.
10. Calvert GA, Thesen T. Multisensory integration: Methodological approaches and emerging principles in the human brain. J Physiol Paris 2004; 98:191 -205.
11. Macaluso E. Multisensory processing in sensory-specific cortical areas. Neuroscientist 2006; 12:327-338.
12. Kanayama N, Sato A, Ohira H. Crossmodal effect with rubber hand illusion and γ-band activity. Psychophysiology 2007; 44:392-402.
13. Spence C, Pavani F, Driver J. Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-distractor congruency effects. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2004; 4:148-169.
14. Spence C, Walton M. On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task. Acta Psychol 2005; 118:47-70.
15. Kanayama N, Sato A, Ohira H. The role of γ band oscillations and synchrony on rubber hand illusion and crossmodal integration. Brain Cogn 2008. [Epub ahead of print]
16. Jung TP, Makeig S, Humphries C, Lee TW, McKeown MJ, Iragui V, et al. Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 2000; 37:163-178.
17. Lange K, Röder B. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities. J Cogn Neurosci 2006; 18:715-729.
18. Sakowitz OW, Quiroga R, Schürmann M, Başar E. Bisensory stimulation increases γ-responses over multiple cortical regions. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2001; 11:267-279.
19. Senkowski D, Herrmann CS. Effects of task difficulty on evoked γ activity and ERPs in a visual discrimination task. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113:1742-1753.
20. Senkowski D, Talsma D, Herrmann CS, Woldorff MG. Multisensory processing and oscillatory γ responses: Effects of spatial selective attention. Exp Brain Res 2005; 166:411-426.
21. Senkowski D, Talsma D, Grigutsch M, Herrmann CS, Woldorff MG. Good times for multisensory integration: Effects of the precision of temporal synchrony as revealed by γ-band oscillations. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45:561-571.