Comparison of supine magnetic resonance imaging with and without rectal contrast to fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography for the diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 125-130

  Pannu, Harpreet K ^a,b   Scatarige, John C ^a   Eng, John ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cystocolpoproctography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pelvic organ prolapse

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; MAGNETISM; RESONANCE;

AVERAGE AGES; CYSTOCOLPOPROCTOGRAPHY; ODD RATIOS; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PRESENCE-ABSENCE; SMALL BOWEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

BARIUM; BARIUM SULFATE; CYSTOCONRAY; DIATRIZOATE; INTROPASTE; MEGLUMINE DIATRIZOATE; MEGLUMINE IOTALAMATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER; COLON DISEASE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOCELE; DEFECOGRAPHY; ENTEROCELE; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPIC CYSTOCOLPOPROCTOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME VARIABLE; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTOCELE; RECTUM; SIGMOIDOCELE; SMALL INTESTINE; SUPINE POSITION; VAGINA; COLONOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYSTOSCOPY; FLUOROSCOPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; RECTAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERUS PROLAPSE;

ADMINISTRATION, RECTAL; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONOSCOPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; CYSTOSCOPY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECTUM; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPINE POSITION; UTERINE PROLAPSE;

EID: 62149086686     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318161d739     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Gousse AE, Barbaric ZL, Safir MH, et al. Dynamic half Fourier acquisition, single shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the female pelvis. J Urol. 2000;164:1606-1613.
2. Comiter CV, Vasavada SP, Barbaric ZL, et al. Grading pelvic prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Urol. 1999;54:454-457.
3. Weidner AC, Low VHS. Imaging studies of the pelvic floor. Obstet Gynecol Clin. 1998;25:826-848.
4. Brubaker L, Heit MH. Radiology of the pelvic floor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;36:952-959.
5. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DDT, Hale DS, et al. Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystoproctography. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:81-88.
6. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, et al. Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent. Eur Radiol. 1997; 7:1309-1317.
7. Delemarre JBVM, Kruyt RH, Doornbos J, et al. Anterior rectocele: assessment with radiographic defecography, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994; 37:249-259.
8. Matsuoka H, Wexner SD, Desai MB, et al. A comparison between dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and videoproctography in patients with constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:571-576.
9. Vanbeckevoort D, Van Hoe L, Oyen R, et al. Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;9:373-377.
10. Goh V, Halligan S, Kaplan G, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174: 661-666.
11. Bertschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology. 2002;223:501-508.
12. Barber MD, Lambers A, Visco AG, et al. Effect of patient position on clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:18-22.
13. Fielding JR, Griffiths DJ, Versi E, et al. MR imaging of pelvic floor continence mechanisms in the supine and sitting positions. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1607-1610.
14. Gufler H, Ohde A, Grau G, et al. Colpocystoproctography in the upright and supine positions correlated with dynamic MRI of the pelvic floor. Eur J Radiol. 2004;51:41-47.
15. Gufler H, Laubenberger J, DeGregorio G, et al. Pelvic floor descent: dynamic MR imaging using a half-Fourier RARE sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;9:378-383.
16. Schoenenberger AW, Debatin JF, Guldenschuh I, et al. Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system. Radiology. 1998;206:641-646.
17. Lamb GM, De Jode MG, Gould SW, et al. Upright dynamic MR defaecating proctography in an open configuration MR system. Br J Radiol. 2000;73:152-155.
18. Law PA, Danin JC, Lamb GM, et al. Dynamic imaging of the pelvic floor using an open-configuration magnetic resonance scanner. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:923-929.
19. Hilfiker PR, Debatin JF, Schwizer W, et al. MR defecography: depiction of anorectal anatomy and pathology. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:749-755.
20. Jorge JM, Habr-Gama A, Wexner SD. Clinical applications and techniques of cinedefecography. Am J Surg. 2001;182:93-101.
21. Goei R, Kemerink G. Radiation dose in defecography. Radiology. 1990;176:137-139.
22. Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends:2000 Computed Tomography. Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc., and Food and Drug Administration. Available at: www.crcpd.org/NEXT.asp. Accessed April 2007.
23. Maglinte DDT, Kelvin FM, Fitzgerald K, et al. Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:439-444.
24. Unterweger M, Marincek B, Gottstein-Aalame N, et al. Ultrafast MR imaging of the pelvic floor. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:959-963.
25. Etlik O, Arslan H, Odabasi O, et al. The role of the MR-fluoroscopy in the diagnosis and staging of the pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53:136-141.
26. Dietz HP, Eldridge A, Grace M, et al. Pelvic organ descent in young nulligravid women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:95-99.