An R&D Roundtable

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 349-363

  Kortum, Samuel S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Growth; Innovation; Patent; R D; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 62149086558     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10438590410001629034     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Blundell, R., Griffith, R., and van Reenen, J., (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic Studies, 66: 529–554.
2. Branstetter, L., and Sakakibara, M., (2002). When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data. American Economic Review, 92: 143–159.
3. Carlin, W., and Mayer, C., (1992). Restructuring enterprises in Eastern Europe. Economic Policy, 0: 311–346.
4. Cornelli, F., and Schankerman, M., (1999). Patent renewals and R&D incentives. Rand Journal of Economics, 30: 197–213.
5. Dasgupta, P., and Stiglitz, J., (1980). Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity. Economic Journal, 90: 226–293.
6. Dryden, N., Nickell, S., and Nicolitsas, D., (1997). What makes firms perform well?. European Economic Review, 41: 783–796.
7. Farrell, J., and Shapiro, C., (1990). Horizontal mergers: An equilibrium analysis. American Economic Review, 80: 107–126.
8. Galdon-Sanchez, J., and Schmitz, J., (2002). Competitive pressure and labor productivity: World iron ore markets in the 1980s. American Economic Review, 92: 1222–1235.
9. Goldin C., Katz L. F., (1999) The Returns to Skill in the United States Across the Twentieth Century NBER Working Paper No. 7126
10. Green, J., and Scotchmer, S., (1990). Novelty and disclosure in patent law. Rand Journal of Economics, 21: 131–146.
11. Griffith R., Redding S., van Reenen J., (2000) Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2457
12. Griliches Z., (1984) In: Griliches, Z. (Ed.) R&D, Patents and Productivity University of Chicago Press
13. Griliches, Z., (1994). Productivity, R&D, and the data constraint. American Economic Review, 84: 1–23.
14. Harhoff D., (1999) Determinants of Opposition Against EPO Patent Grants: The Case of Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals Mimeo, University of Munich
15. Helpman E., Trajtenberg M., (1997) A time to sow and a time to reap: Growth based on general purpose technologies In: Helpman, E. (Ed.) General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth MIT Press
16. Hopenhayn, H., and Mitchell, M. F., (2000). Innovation variety and patent design. Rand Journal of Economics, 31: 152–166.
17. Jaffe, A., (2000). The US patent system in transition: Policy innovation and the innovation process. Research Policy, 29: 531–557.
18. King, R. G., and Levine, R., (1993a). Finance, entrepreneurship and growth: Theory and evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32: 513–742.
19. King, R. G., and Levine, R., (1993b). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 717–737.
20. Klemperer, P., (1990). How broad should the scope of patent protection be?. Rand Journal of Economics, 21: 113–130.
21. Kremer, M., (1998). Patent buyouts: A mechanism for encouraging innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113: 1137–1167.
22. Lanjouw J. O., Schankerman M., (1999) The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators NBER Working Paper No. 7345
23. Lanjouw, J. O., and Schankeman, M., (2001). Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. Rand Journal of Economics, 32: 129–151.
24. Lerner, J., (1995). Patenting in the shadow of competitors. Journal of Law and Economics, 38: 563–595.
25. Lerner J., Shane H., Tsai A., (2003) Do equity financing cycles matter? Evidence from biotechnology alliances Journal of Financial Economics (forthcoming)
26. Nelson R. R., (1962) In: Nelson, R. R. (Ed.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Universities NBER Conference Series No. 13 Princeton University Press
27. Nelson, R. R., and Phelps, E. S., (1966). Investment in humans, technology diffusion and economic growth. American Economic Review, 56: 69–75.
28. Nickell, S., (1996). Competition and corporate performance. Journal of Political Economy, 104: 724–796.
29. Niininen P., Toivanen O., (1999) Investment, R&D subsidies and credit constraints Presented at the NBER Summer Institute R&D Conference
30. Qian, Y., and Xu, C., (1998). Innovation and bureaucracy under soft and hard budget constraints. Review of Economic Studies, 65: 151–164.
31. Roberts, M., and Tybout, J. R., (1997). The decision to export in Columbia: An empirical model of entry with sunk costs. American Economic Review, 87: 545–564.
32. Schmookler J., (1966) Invention and Economic Growth Harvard University Press
33. Scotchmer, S., (1999). On the optimality of the patent renewal system. Rand Journal of Economics, 30: 181–196.
34. Stern S., (1999) Do Scientists Pay to be Scientists? Evidence from R&D Job Offers NBER Working Paper No. 7410