Precommercial thinning of pedunculate oak: Recreational preferences of the population of Denmark for different thinning practices in young stands

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 28-36

  Jensen, Frank Søndergaard ^a   Skovsgaard, Jens Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Forest recreation; Oak; Quercus; Slash; Stand density; Thinning; Thinning waste

Indexed keywords

PHOTOGRAPHY; SURVEYS;

FOREST RECREATION; OAK; QUERCUS; SLASH; STAND DENSITY; THINNING; THINNING WASTE;

FORESTRY;

DENMARK; FORESTRY; FORESTS; PHOTOGRAPHY; QUERCUS; SURVEYS; THINNING;

QUERCUS;

EID: 61949307786     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827580802592475     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Gundersen, V. S. & Frivold, L. H. (2005). Integrating visual structures in urban silviculture: A review of Fennoscandian preference studies and a proposal for a zoning model. In V. S. Gundersen (Ed.), Urban woodland management in Norway. Integrating aesthetic and ecological elements in silviculture. Doctor Scientarium Thesis 2005:34, Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
2. Haakenstad, H. (1975). Skogskjøtsel i rekreasjonsområder. Skog og friluftsliv i to modellområder i Oslomarka. Ås: Institutt for Skogskjøtsel, Norges Landbrukshøgskole.
3. Hauch, L. A. (1908). Udhugning i unge Egebevoksninger. Det forstlige Forsøgsvæsen i Danmark, 1, 353-378.
4. Hauch, L. A. (1915). Udhugning i unge Egebevoksninger. Det forstlige Forsøgsvæsen i Danmark, 4, 381-396.
5. Hendee, J. C. & Harris, R. W. (1970). Foresters' perception of wilderness-user attitudes and preferences. Journal of Forestry, 68, 759-762.
6. Hilden, J. (1980). Signifikans i utide. Ugeskrift for Læger, 142, 525-526.
7. Hultman, S.-G. (1981). Jägmästarns yrkesroll-på gott och ont. Sveriges Skogsvårdsförbunds Tidskrift, 6, 15-34. [Correction in Sveriges Skogsvårdsförbunds Tidskrift (1982), 7, 79-80.]
8. Hultman, S.-G. (1983). Allmänhetens bedömning av skogsmiljöers lämplighet för friluftsliv. 1. Bedömning på plats eller i bild? Uppsala: Section of Environmental Forestry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Report 27.
9. Jensen, F. S. (1993). Landscape managers' and politicians' perception of the forest and landscape preferences of the population. Forest & Landscape Research, 1, 79-93.
10. Jensen, F. S. (1999). Forest recreation in Denmark from the 1970s to the 1990s. Research Series 26. Hørsholm: Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute.
11. Jensen, F. S. & Koch, N. E. (1997). Friluftsliv i skovene 1976/77-1993/94. Research Series 20 Hørsholm: Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute.
12. Johnson, D. R. & Creech, J. C. (1983). Ordinal measures in multiple indicator models: A simulation of categorization error. American Sociological Review, 48, 398-407.
13. Kardell, L. (1990). Talltorpsmon i Åtvidaberg. 1. Förandringar i upplevelsen av skogen mellan 1978 och 1989. Report 46. Uppsala: Section of Environmental Forestry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
14. Kardell, L. & Holmer, M. (1985). Friluftslivets förändringar på Bogesundslandet 1969-1982. Rapport 33. Uppsala: Avdelningen för landskapsvård, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet.
15. Koch, N. E. (1977a). Skovenes friluftsfunktion. Præ ferencemåling. Tidligere anvendte metoder. Projekt Skov og Folk, Arbejdsnotat nr. 4. Copenhagen: Danish Forest Experiment Station.
16. Koch, N. E. (1977b). Skovenes friluftsfunktion. Præ ferencemåling. Metodeforslag. Projekt Skov og Folk. Arbejdsnotat nr. 5. Copenhagen: Danish Forest Experiment Station.
17. Koch, N. E. & Jensen, F. S. (1988). Skovenes friluftsfunktion i Danmark. IV. del. Befolkningens ønsker til skovenes og det åbne lands udformning (Forest recreation in Denmark. Part IV: The preferences of the population). Det Forstlige Forsøgsvæsen i Danmark, 41, 243-516.
18. Larsen, P. H.& Johannsen, V. K. (Eds.) (2002). Skove og plantager 2000. Danmarks Statistik, Skov & Landskab (FSL), Skov- og Naturstyrelsen [with CD].
19. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
20. Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. & Bent, D. H. (1975). SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. O'Leary, T. N. & McCormack, A. G. (1998). Development of a trans-European public concerning forest landscape issues: A reflection of current research needs. In D. Terrasson (Ed.), Public perception and attitudes of forest owners towards forest in Europe. Perception publique et attitudes des propriétaires envers la forêt en Europe. Commentaires et synthèses du groupe de travail COST E3-WG1, 1994/1998 (pp. 207-232). Antony: Cemagref Éditions.
22. Ribe, R. G. (1989). The aesthetics of forestry: What has empirical preference research taught us? Environmental Management, 13, 55-74.
23. Rune, F. & Skovsgaard, J. P. (2007). Afforestation with oak: Effects of pre-commercial thinning on the development of ground flora. TemaNord, 508, 203-209.
24. Silvennoinen, H., Pukkala, T. & Tahvanainen, L. (2002). Effects of cuttings on the scenic beauty of a tree stand. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 263-273.
25. Skovsgaard, J. P. (2008). Precommercial thinning of oak. Experiment no. 1516, Bregentved Estate, Haslev Orned, cp. 31a. Establishment Report No. 608, Forest and Landscape, University of Copenhagen.
26. Tyrväinen, L., Silvennoinen, H. & Kolehmainen, O. (2003). Ecological and aesthetic values in urban forest management. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 1, 135-149.
27. Willhite, R. G. & Sise, W. R. (1974). Measurement of reaction to forest practice. Journal of Forestry, 72, 567-571.
28. Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L. & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9, 1-33.