The myth of religious experience

Religious Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-22

  Zangwill, Nick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61949180746     PISSN: 00344125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0034412503006772     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. ARISTOTLE (1985) Metaphysics (Indianapolis IN: Hackett)
2. ALSTON, WILLIAM (1991) Perceiving God (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press)
3. (1994) 'Reply to commentators', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54, 891-899
4. GALE, RICHARD (1994) 'Why Alston's mystical doxastic practice is subjective', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54, 869-875
5. KENNY, ANTHONY (1992) What is Faith? (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
6. EWIS, DAVID (1966) 'An argument for the identity theory', Journal of Philosophy, 63, 17-25
7. AIMONIDES, MOSES (1958) Guide for the Perplexed, tr. M. Friedlander (London: Dover)
8. MARTIN, MICHAEL (1986) 'The principle of credulity and religious experience', Religious Studies, 22, 79-93
9. OLNAR, GEORGE (2000) 'Truth-makers for negative truths', Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 78, 72-86
10. SWINBURNE, RICHARD (1991) The Existence of God, 2nd edn (Blackwell: Oxford)
11. ZANGWILL, NICK (2003) 'Negative properties, determination and conditionals', Topoi, 22, 127-134