Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 546-551

  Keus, F ^a,b   Wetterslev, J ^a   Gluud, C ^a   Gooszen, H G ^c   Van Laarhoven, C J H M ^a,d  

^a Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

^b DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLELITHIASIS; CLINICAL STUDY; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 61949136504     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2008.22     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Sutton AJ, Higgins JPT. Recent developments in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2007;27:625-50.
2. Sweeting MJ, Sutton AJ, Lambert PC. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. Stat Med 2004;23:1351-75.
3. Keus F, de Jong JAF, Gooszen HG et al. Small-incision versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;4:CD004788.
4. Keus F, de Jong JAF, Gooszen HG et al. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;4:CD006231.
5. Keus F, de Jong JAF, Gooszen HG et al. Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;4:CD006229.
6. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 4.2 for Windows. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration: Copenhagen, 2003.
7. Bradburn MJ, Deeks JJ, Berlin JA et al. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. Stat Med 2007;26:53-77.
8. Deeks JJ. Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes. Stat Med 2002;21:1575-600.
9. Agresti A. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley and Sons: New York, 1996.
10. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-88.
11. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719-48.
12. Greenland S, Robins JM. Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data. Biometrics 1985;41:55-68.
13. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539-58.
14. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J et al. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:64-75.
15. Brok J, Thorlund K, Gluud C et al. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:763-9.
16. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008 〈http://www.cochrane. org〉.
17. Sidik K, Jonkman JN. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies. Stat Med 2007;26:1964-81.
18. Friedrich JO, Adhikari NK, Beyene J. Inclusion of zero total event trials in meta-analyses maintains analytic consistency and incorporates all available data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:5.
19. Poole C, Greenland S. Random-effects meta-analyses are not always conservative. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:469-75.
20. Keus F, Werner JEM, Gooszen HG et al. Randomized clinical trial on smallincision and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis: primary and clinical outcome. Arch Surg 2008;143:371-7.
21. Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP et al. Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet 1996;347:989-94.
22. Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Ann Surg 2001;234:741-9.
23. Barkun JS, Barkun AN, Sampalis JS et al. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Lancet 1992;340:1116-9.
24. Bruce DM, Smith M, Walker CB et al. Minimal access surgery for cholelithiasis induces an attenuated acute phase response. Am J Surg 1999;178:232-4.
25. Coelho JC, de Araujo RP, Marchesini JB et al. Pulmonary function after cholecystectomy performed through Kocher's incision, a mini-incision, and laparoscopy. World J Surg 1993;17:544-6.
26. Grande M, Tucci GF, Adorisio O et al. Systemic acute-phase response after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2002;16:313-6.
27. Harju J, Juvonen P, Eskelinen M et al. Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized study with special reference to obesity. Surg Endosc 2006;20:583-6.
28. Kunz R, Orth K, Vogel J et al. [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-lapcholecystectomy. Results of a prospective, randomized study] (article in German). Laparoskopische Cholecystektomie versus Mini-Lap-Cholecystektomie. Ergebnisse einer prospektiven, randomisierten Studie. Chirurg 1992;63:291-5.
29. McGinn FP, Miles AJ, Uglow M et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1995;82:1374-7.
30. McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Baxter JN et al. Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial. Lancet 1994;343:135-8.
31. Secco GB, Cataletti M, Bonfante P et al. [Laparoscopic versus mini-cholecystectomy: analysis of hospital costs and social costs in a prospective randomized study] (article in Italian). Video-colecistectomia versus mini-colecistectomia: analisi dei costi ospedalieri e dei costi sociali in uno studio prospettico randomizzato. Chir Ital 2002;54:685-92.
32. Srivastava A, Srinivas G, Misra MC et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy for gallstone disease. A randomized trial. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001;17:497-502.
33. Tate JJ, Lau WY, Leung KL et al. Laparoscopic versus mini-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet 1993;341:1214-5.
34. Vagenas K, Spyrakopoulos P, Karanikolas M et al. Mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: which way to go? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006;16:321-4.
35. Furukawa TA, Watanabe N, Omori IM et al. Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses. JAMA 2007;297:468-70.