Comparison of the behavior of natural and refilled porcine lenses in a robotic lens stretcher

Experimental Eye Research

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 483-494

  Reilly, Matthew A ^a,b   Hamilton, Paul D ^a   Perry, Gavin ^b   Ravi, Nathan ^a,b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

accommodation; accommodation forces; cataract; lens; lens curvature; lens stretching; optomechanics; presbyopia

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; LENS; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL ROTATION; PRESBYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFILLED LENS; ROBOTICS; SWINE; TOPOGRAPHY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ANIMALS; ELASTICITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; PRESBYOPIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR; ROBOTICS; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 61849174065     PISSN: 00144835     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.10.021     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Aliyar H.A., Hamilton P.D., and Ravi N. Refilling of ocular lens capsule with copolymeric hydrogel containing reversible disulfide. Biomacromolecules 6 (2005) 204-211
2. de Almeida M.S., and Carvalho L.A. Different schematic eyes and their accuracy to the in vivo eye: a quantitative comparison study. Brazilian J. Phys. 37 2A (2007) 378-387
3. Bartholomew L.R., Pang D.X., Sam D.A., and Cavender J.C. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of globes from young adult pigs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 58 9 (1997) 942-948
4. Bjork I. Comparative studies of α-crystallin from lenses of different mammalian species. Exp. Eye Res. 7 (1968) 129-133
5. Box G.E.P., and Draper N.R. Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces (1987), Wiley, New York
6. Box G.E.P., and Wetz J. Criteria for Judging Adequacy of Estimation by Approximating Response Function. Technical Report 9 (1973), Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison
7. Box G.E.P., Hunter J.S., and Hunter W.G. Statistics for Experimenters (2005), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ
8. Coile D.C., and O'Keefe L.P. Schematic eyes for domestic animals. Ophthalmol. Physiol. Opt. 8 (1988) 216-220
9. David G., Pedrigi R.M., Heistand M.R., and Humphrey J.D. Regional multiaxial mechanical properties of the porcine anterior lens capsule. J. Biomech. Eng. 129 1 (2007) 97-104
10. De Jong W.W., van Amelsvoort F.M., van der Ouderaa F.J., and Bloemendal H. Slow rate of evolution of alpha A chain of alpha crystallin. Nat. New Biol. 246 (1973) 233-236
11. De Korte C.L., van der Steen A.F., Thijssen J.M., Duindam J.J., Otto C., and Puppels G.J. Relation between local acoustic parameters and protein distribution in human and porcine eye lenses. Exp. Eye Res. 59 (1994) 617-627
12. Dubbelman, M., 2002. Changes in the Anterior Eye Segment with Age and Accommodation: In Vivo Measurements of the Human Cornea and Lens Using Scheimpflug Imaging and Ultrasonography. Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit.
13. Ejiri M., Thompson H.E., and O'Neill W.D. Dynamic visco-elastic properties of the lens. Vision Res. 9 (1969) 233-344
14. Fincham E.F. The mechanism of accommodation. Br. J. Opthalmol. 21 Suppl. (1937) 1-80
15. Fisher R.F. The significance of the shape of the lens and capsular energy changes in accommodation. J. Physiol. 201 (1969) 21-47
16. Fisher R.F. The force of contraction of the human ciliary muscle during accommodation. J. Physiol. 270 (1977) 51-74
17. Gamlin P.D.R. Neural mechanisms for the control of vergence eye movements. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 956 (2002) 264-272
18. Glasser A., and Campbell C.W. Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age. Vision Res. 38 2 (1998) 209-229
19. Glasser A., and Kaufman P.L. The mechanism of accommodation in primates. Ophthalmology 106 (1999) 863-872
20. Gullstrand A. Mechanism of accommodation. In: Southall J.P.C. (Ed). Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics (1924), The Optical Society of America 382-415 Translated from German 3rd edition, 1909
21. Heys K.R., Cram S.L., and Truscott R.J.W. Massive increase in the stiffness of the human lens nucleus with age: the basis for presbyopia?. Mol. Vis. 10 (2004) 956-963
22. Ho A., Manns F., Pham T., and Parel J.M. Predicting the performance of accommodating intraocular lenses using ray tracing. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 32 1 (2006) 129-136
23. Itoi M., Ito N., and Kaneko H. Visco-elastic properties of the lens. Exp. Eye Res. 4 (1965) 168-173
24. Jones C.E., Atchison D.A., Meder R., and Pope J.M. Refractive index distribution and optical properties of the isolated human lens measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Vision Res. 45 18 (2005) 2352-2366
25. Kessler J. Experiments in refilling the lens. Arch. Ophthalmol. 71 (1964) 412-417
26. Koopmans S.A., Terwee T., Barkhof J., Haitjema H.J., and Kooijman A.C. Polymer refilling of presbyopic human lenses in vitro restores the ability to undergo accommodative changes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44 (2003) 250-257
27. Koopmans S.A., Terwee T., Haitjema H.J., Barkhof J., and Kooijman A.C. Effect of infusion bottle height on lens power after lens refilling with and without a plug. J. Cat. Refract. Surg. 29 10 (2003) 1989-1995
28. Koopmans S.A., Terwee T., Haitjema H.J., Deuring H., van Aarle S., and Kooijman A.C. Relation between injected volume and optical parameters in refilled isolated porcine lenses. Ophthalmol. Physiol. Opt. 24 (2004) 572-579
29. Koopmans S.A., Terwee T., Glasser A., Wendt M., Vilupuru A.S., van Kooten T.G., Norrby S., Haitjema H.J., and Kooijman A.C. Accommodative lens refilling in rhesus monkeys. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47 7 (2006) 2976-2984
30. Krag S., and Andreassen T. Biomechanical measurements of the porcine lens capsule. Exp. Eye Res. 62 (1996) 253-260
31. Krag S., and Andreassen T.T. Mechanical properties of the human lens capsule. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 22 (2003) 749-767
32. Kulachi M., and Box G.E.P. Catalysis of discovery and development in engineering and industry. Qual. Eng. 15 3 (2003) 509-513
33. Levy N. Comparing MRIs with movement artifacts. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (2000) E-letter
34. Liao J.H., Hung C.C., Lee J.S., Wu S.H., and Chiou S.H. Characterization, cloning, and expression of porcine αB crystallin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 244 (1998) 131-137
35. Manns F., Parel J.M., Denham D., Billotte C., Ziebarth N., Borja D., Fernandez V., Aly M., Arrieta E., Ho A., and Holden B. Optomechanical response of human and monkey lenses in a lens stretcher. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48 (2007) 3260-3268
36. Moffat B.A., Atchison D.A., and Pope J.M. Age-related changes in refractive index distribution and power of the human lens as measured by magnetic resonance micro-imaging in vitro. Vision Res. 42 13 (2002) 1683-1693
37. Moore D., and McCabe G. Introduction to the Practice of Statistics (1993), W.H. Freeman and Company, New York
38. Nishi O., Nishi K., Mano C., Ichihara M., and Honda T. Controlling the capsular shape in lens refilling. Arch. Ophthalmol. 115 (1997) 507-510
39. Parel J.M., Gelender H., Trefers W.F., and Norton E.W. Phaco-Ersatz: cataract surgery designed to preserve accommodation. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 224 (1986) 165-173
40. Pedrigi R., David G., Dziezyc J., and Humphrey J.D. Altered multiaxial mechanical properties of the porcine anterior lens capsule cultured in high glucose. J. Biomech. Eng. 129 1 (2007) 121-125
41. Pierscionek B.K. Presbyopia - effect of refractive index. Clin. Exp. Opt. 73 (1990) 23-30
42. Pierscionek B.K. Age-related response of human lenses to stretching forces. Exp. Eye Res. 60 (1995) 325-332
43. Pierscionek B.K., Belaidi A., and Bruun H.H. Refractive index distribution in the porcine eye lens for 532 nm and 633 nm light. Eye 19 (2005) 375-381
44. Rapp, B., 2005. Insights into Lens Viscoelasticity and Refractive Power: The Role of the Lens Crystallins. MA thesis, Washington University in St. Louis.
45. Reilly M.A., and Ravi N. Equibiaxial stretching device for the determination of polymeric film properties. Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. Am. Chem. Soc. (2006) Atlanta, GA
46. Reilly, M.A., Ravi, N. Microindentation of the Young Porcine Ocular Lens. J. Biomech. Eng., in press.
47. Reilly M.A., Hamilton P.D., and Ravi N. Dynamic multi-arm radial lens stretcher: a robotic analog of the ciliary body. Exp. Eye Res. 86 (2008) 157-164
48. Reilly M.A., Rapp B., Hamilton P.D., Shen A.Q., and Ravi N. Material characterization of porcine lenticular soluble proteins. Biomacromolecules 9 6 (2008) 1519-1526
49. Roorda A., and Glasser A. Wave aberrations of the isolated crystalline lens. J. Vision 4 4 (2004) 250-261
50. Schachar R.A. Qualitative effect of zonular tension on freshly extracted intact human crystalline lenses: implications for the mechanism of accommodation. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45 (2004) 2691-2695
51. Schachar R.A., and Kamangar F. Computer image analysis of ultrasound biomicroscopy of primate accommodation. Eye 20 (2006) 226-233
52. Schachar R.A., Black T.D., Kash R.L., Cudmore D.P., and Schanzlin D.J. The mechanism of accommodation and presbyopia in the primate. Ann. Ophthalmol. 27 (1995) 58-67
53. Schor, C.M., Bharadwaj, S.R., 2004. A Pulse-Step Model of Accommodation Dynamics. In: Proceedings of Annual International Conference. IEEE EMBS, San Francisco, CA.
54. Smith W.J. Image Formation (First-Order Optics). In: Gonneau A.D., and Bernardi A. (Eds). Modern Optical Engineering: The Design of Optical Systems (1990), McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York 36-39
55. Soergel F., Meyer C., Eckert G., Abele B., and Pechhold W. Spectral analysis of viscoelasticity of the human lens. J. Refract. Surg. 15 (1999) 714-716
56. Strenk S.A., Semmlow J.L., Strenk L.M., Munoz P., Gronlund-Jacob J., and DeMarco J.K. Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle and lens: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40 (1999) 1162-1169
57. Strenk S.A., Strenk L.M., Semmlow J.L., and DeMarco J.K. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the effects of age and accommodation on the human lens cross-sectional area. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45 (2004) 539-545
58. Strenk S.A., Strenk L.M., and Koretz J.F. The mechanism of presbyopia. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 24 (2005) 379-393
59. Sunderland H.R., and O'Neill W.D. Functional dependence of optical parameters on circumferential forces in the cat lens. Vision Res. 16 (1976) 1151-1158
60. Swindle K.E., Hamilton P.D., and Ravi N. In situ formation of hydrogels as vitreous substitutes: viscoelastic comparison to porcine vitreous. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 87 3 (2008) 656-665
61. Trifonova N., Kalaydjiev S., Stamenova M., Trifonova R., and Breipohl W. Porcine eye lens crystallins: antigenic similarity with human crystallins and tool for the detection of anti-crystallin antibodies. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 240 (2002) 777-781
62. Tscherning M. Physiological Optics (1904), Keysone, Philadelphia, PA pp. 160-189
63. Vilupuru A.S., and Glasser A. Optical and biometric relationships of the isolated pig crystalline lens. Ophthalmic Physiol. Optic 21 (2001) 296-311
64. Von Helmholtz H. Uber die akkommodation des auges. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1 (1855) 1-74
65. Weale R. Presbyopia towards the end of the 20th century. Surv. Ophthalmol. 34 (1989) 15-30
66. Weeber H.A., Eckert G., Soergel F., Meyer C.H., Pechhold W., and van der Heijde R.G.L. Dynamic mechanical properties of human lenses. Exp. Eye Res. 80 (2005) 425-434
67. Weeber H.A., and van der Hiejde R.G.L. Stiffness gradient in the crystalline lens. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 245 9 (2007) 1357-1366
68. Weeber H.A., and van der Heijde R.G.L. On the relationship between lens stiffness and accommodative amplitude. Exp. Eye Res. 85 5 (2007) 602-607
69. Zigler J.S., and Sidbury J.B. A comparative study of the β-crystallins of four sub-mammalian species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 53 (1976) 349-355