Association between isolation of staphylococcus aureus one week after calving and milk yield, somatic cell count, clinical mastitis, and culling through the remaining lactation

Journal of Dairy Research

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 24-35

  Whist, Anne Cathrine ^a,b   Østerås, Olav ^a,b   Sølverød, Liv ^b,c  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b TINE Norwegian Dairies ^*  (Norway)

^c TINE Norwegian Dairies   (Norway)

Author keywords

Clinical mastitis; Culling; Milk yield; Somatic cell count; Staphylococcus aureus

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; CELL COUNT; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; LACTATION; MICROBIOLOGY; MILK; PHYSIOLOGY; PUERPERIUM; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS INFECTION; TIME;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CELL COUNT; FEMALE; LACTATION; MASTITIS, BOVINE; MILK; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 61849171892     PISSN: 00220299     EISSN: 14697629     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022029908003592     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aarestrup FM, Wegener HC, Jensen NE, Jonsson O, Myllys V, Thorberg BM, Waage S & Rosdahl VT 1997 A study of phage- and ribotype patterns of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in the Nordic countries. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 38 243-252.
2. Allison PD 2000 Survival Analysis using the SAS system, 4th printing. SAS Institute, Cary NC, USA.
3. Barkema HW, Schu kken YH & Zadoks RN 2006 Invited Review: The role of cow, pathogen, and treatment regimen in the therapeutic success of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 89 1877-1895.
4. Cox DR 1972 Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). Journal of Royal Statistical Society B 34 187-220.
5. Cröhn YT, Eicker SW, Ducrocq V & Hertl JA 1998 Effect of disease on the culling of Holstein dairy cows in New York State. Journal of Dairy Science 81 966-978.
6. Cröhn YT, Wilson DJ, Gonzales RN, Hertl JA, Schulte H, Bennet C & Schukken YH 2004 Effect of pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87 3358-3374.
7. International Dairy Federation 1981 Laboratory methods for use in mastitis work. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation No 132. Brussels, Belgium:IDF.
8. International Dairy Federation 1999 Suggested interpretation of mastitis terminology. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 338. Brussels, Belgium:IDF.
9. Macciotta NPP, Vicario D & Cappio-Borlino A 2005 Detection of different shapes of lactation curve for milk yield in dairy cattle by empeirical mathematical models. Journal of Dairy Science 88 1178-1191.
10. Middleton JR, Fox LK, Cay JM, Tyler JW & Besser TE 2002 Influence of Staphylococcus aureus strain-type on mammary quarter milk somatic cell count and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase activity in cattle from eight dairies. Journal of Dairy Science 85 1133-1140.
11. National Veterinary Institute 1993 Laboratory routines for mastitis diagnostics at the State Veterinary Laboratories [in Norwegian]. Oslo.
12. Norwegian Cattle Health Services 2006 Annual report [in Norwegian]. http://storfehelse.tine.no/dok/470-ARSRAPPORT-2005.pdf.
13. Østerås O, Edge VL & Martin SW 1999 Determinants of success or failure in the elimination of major mastitis pathogens in selective dry cow therapy. Journal of Dairy Science 82 1221-1231.
14. Østerås O, Sandvik L, Aursj0 J, Gjul GG & Jorstad A 1991 Assessment of strategy in selective dry cow therapy for mastitis control. Journal of Veterinary Medicine B 38 513-522.
15. Østerås O, SØlver0d L & Reksen O 2006 Milk culture results in a large Norwegian survey-effect of season, parity, days in milk, resistance and clustering. Journal of Dairy Science 89 1010-1023.
16. Østerås O, Solbu H, Refsdal AO, Roalkvam T, Filseth O, & Minsaas A 2007 Results and evaluation of thirty years of health recordings in Norwegian dairy cattle population. Journal of Dairy Science 90 4483-4497.
17. Park YH, Fox LK, Hamilton MJ & Davis C 1993 Suppression of proliferative response of BoCD4 T lymphocytes by activating BoCD8 T lymphocytes in the mammary gland of cows with Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Journal of Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 36 137-151
18. Rainard P & Poutrel B 1988 Effect of naturally occurring intramammary infections by minor pathogens on new infections by major pathogens in cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research 49 327-329.
19. Reksen O, Sølver0d L, Branscum AJ & Østerås O 2006 Relationships between milk culture results, and treatment for clinical mastitis or culling in Norwegian dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 89 2928-2937
20. SAS/STAT User's Guide Version 6 second edition 1993 Inst., Inc., Cary NC, USA
21. Schukken YH, Leslie KE, Barnum DA, Mallard BA, Lumsden JH, Dick PC, Vessie GH & Kehrli ME 1999 Experimental Staphylococcus aureus intramammary challenge in late lactation dairy cows: Quarter and cow effects determining the probability of infection. Journal of Dairy Science 82 2393-2401.
22. Schukken YH, Van De Geer D, Grommers FJ, Smith JA & Brand A 1989 Intramammary infections and risk factors for clinical mastitis in herd with low somatic cell counts in bulk milk. Veterinary Record 125 393-396.
23. Shu Y & Klein JP 2005 A SAS Macro for the positive stable frailty model. http://www.biostat.mcw.edu/software/ps-frail.macro.txt.
24. Shu Y & Klein JP 1999 A SAS macro for the positive frailty model. American Statistic Association Procedure, Statistical Computing section, USA, pp. 47-52.
25. Sol J, Sampimon OC, Snoep J & Schukken YH 1994 Factors associated with bacteriological cure after dry cow treatment after subclinical sta- phylococcal mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 77 75-79.
26. Sutra L & Poutrel B 1993 Virulence factors involved in the pathogenesis of bovine intramammary infections due to Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Medical Microbiology 40 79-89.
27. Swinkels JM, Hogeveen H & Zadoks RN 2005 A partial budget model to estimate economic benefits of lactational treatment of subclinical Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 88 4273-4287.
28. Walter SD, Feinstein AR & Well CK 1987 Coding ordinal independent variables in multiple regression analyses. American Journal ofEpidemiology 125 319-323.
29. Whist AC, Østerås O & Sølverød L 2007a Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus dysgalactiae in Norwegian herds after introduction of selective dry cow therapy and teat dipping. Journal of Dairy Research 74 1-8.
30. Whist AC, Østerås O & Sølverød L 2007b Streptococcus dysgalactiae isolates at calving and lactation performance within the same lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 90 766-778.
31. Whist AC & Østerås O 2007c Associations between somatic cell counts at calving or prior to drying-off and clinical mastitis in the remaining or subsequent lactation. Journal of Dairy Research 74 66-73.
32. Wood PDP 1967 Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle. Nature 216 164-165.
33. Zadoks RN, Allore HG, Barkema HW, Sampimon OC, Wellenberg GJ, Grohn YT & Shukken YH 2001 Cow and quarter level risk factors for Streptococcus uberis and Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 84 2649-2663.
34. Zecconi A, Binda E, Borromeo V & Piccinini R 2005 Relationship between some Staphylococcus aureus pathogenic factors and growth rates or somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Research 72 203-208.