The role of extended prostate biopsy on prostate cancer detection rate: A study performed on the bench

International Braz J Urol

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 563-570

  Nesrallah, Luciano ^a   Nesrallah, Adriano ^a   Antunes, Alberto A ^a   Leite, Katia R ^a   Srougi, Miguel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biopsy needle; Diagnosis; Pathology; Prostatic neoplasm

Indexed keywords

EID: 61849134397     PISSN: 16775538     EISSN: 16776119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382008000500004     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007; 57: 43-66.
2. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA: Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol. 1989; 142: 71-4; discussion 74-5.
3. Feneley MR, Parkinson MC: Biopsy diagnosis of prostatic cancer - current areas of concern. J Clin Pathol. 1997; 50: 265-6.
4. Chen ME, Troncoso P, Johnston DA, Tang K, Babaian RJ: Optimization of prostate-biopsy strategy using computer based analysis. J Urol. 1997; 158: 2168-75.
5. Ellis WJ, Brawer MK: Repeat prostate needle biopsy: who needs it? J Urol. 1995; 153: 1496-8.
6. Keetch DW, Catalona WJ, Smith DS: Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. J Urol. 1994; 151: 1571-4.
7. Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparén P, Norlén BJ, Busch C: The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology. 1997; 50: 562-6.
8. Terris MK: Sensitivity and specificity of sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: preliminary report. Urology. 1999; 54: 486-9.
9. Stamey TA: Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. Urology. 1995; 45: 2-12.
10. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL: Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol. 1997; 157: 199-202; discussion 202-3.
11. Levine MA, Ittman M, Melamed J, Lepor H: Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of Ae prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol. 1998-,159: 471-5; discussion 475-6.
12. Presti JC Jr, Chang JJ, Bhargava V, Shinohara K: The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol. 2000; 163: 163-6; discussion 166-7.
13. Babaian RJ, Toi A, Kamoi K, Troncoso P, Sweet J, Evans R, et al.: A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directod biopsy strategy. J Urol. 2000; 163: 152-7.
14. Naughton CK, Miller DC, Mager DE, Ornstein DK, Catalona WJ: A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy Ares: impact on cancer detection. J Urol. 2000; 164: 388-92.
15. Davis M, Sofer M, Kim SS, Soloway MS: The procedure of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a survey of patient preparation and biopsy technique. J Urol. 2002; 167: 566-70.
16. Patel HR, Lee F, Arya M, Masood S, Palmer JH, Sheriff MK: Anational. survey of transrectal uttrasound-guided prostatic biopsies: time for a national guideline. Int J Clin Pract.-2003; 57: 773-4.
17. Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, Myers L, Bachmann LM, Kleijnen J: Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol. 2006; 175: 1605-12.
18. Bostwick DG, Foster CS: Examination of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Therapeutic and Prognostic Significance. In: Foster CS, Bostwick DG (eds.) Pathology of Prostate. Philadelphia, WB Saunders. i998; pp. 172.
19. Gleason DF: Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective. Hum Pathol. 1992; 23: 273-9.
20. Naughton CK, Smith DS, Humphrey PA, Catalona WJ, Keetch DW: Clinical and pathologic tumor characteristics of prostate cancer as a finiction of the number of biopsy cores: a retrospective study. Urology. 1998; 52: 80843.
21. Matsumoto K, Satoh T, Egawa S, Shimura. S, Kuwao S, Baba S: Efficacy and morbidity of transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core biopsy for detection of prostate cancer in Japanese men. Int J Urol. 2005; 12: 353-60.
22. Kojima M, Hayakawa T, Saito T, Mitsuya H, Hayase Y: Transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer. Int J Urol. 2001; 8: 301-7.
23. Emiliozzi P, Scarpone P, DePaula F, Pizzo M, Federico G, Pansadoro A, et al.: The incidence of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen greater than 4.0 ng/ml: a randomized study of 6 versus 12 core transperineal prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2004; 171: 197-9.
24. Uzzo RG, Wei JT, Waldbaum RS, Perlmutter AP, Byrne JC, Vaugbon ED Jr: The influence of prostate size on cancer detection. Urology. 1995; 46: 831-6.
25. Mariappan P, Chong WL, Sundram M, Mohamed SR: Increasing prostate biopsy cores based on volume vs the sextant biopsy: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study on cancer detection rates and morbidity. BJU Int. 2004; 94:307-10.
26. Eskicorapci SY, Guliyev F, Akdogan B, Dogan HS, Ergen A, Ozen H: Individualization of the biopsy protocol according to the prostate gland volume for prostate cancer detection. J Urol. 2005; 173: 1536-40.
27. Eskicorapci SY, Baydar DE, Akbal C, Sofikerim M, Günay M, Ekici S, et al.: An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate caricer. Eur Urol. 2004; 45: 444-8; discussion 448-9.
28. Singh H, Canto EI, Shariat SF, Kadmon D, Miles BJ, Wheeler TM, et al.: Improved detection of clinically significant, curable prostate cancer with systematic 12-core biopsy. J Urol. 2004; 171: 1089-92.
29. Remzi M, Fong YK, Dobrovits M, Anagnostou T, Seitz C, Waldert M, et al.: The Vienna nomogram: validation of a novel biopsy strategy defining the optimal number of cores-based on patient age and total prostate volume. J Urol. 2005; 174: 1256-60; discussion 1260-1; author reply 1261.
30. Jones JS, Patel A, Schoenfield L, Rabets JC, Zippe CD, Magi-Galluzzi C: Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy. J Urol. 2006; 175: 485-8.
31. Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, Myers L, Bachmann LM, Kleijnen J: Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol. 2006; 175: 1605-12.