Effects of spatial grid resolution on river flow and surface inundation simulation by physically based distributed modelling approach

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 534-545

  Dutta, Dushmanta ^a   Nakayama, Keisuke ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b KITAMI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Hydrological model; Physically based distributed model; River flow; Spatial grid resolution; Surface inundation; Tsurumi river; Yom river

Indexed keywords

FLOOD CONTROL; FLOW SIMULATION; GEOMORPHOLOGY; HYDRAULIC MODELS; METEOROLOGICAL RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY FACTOR; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; STREAM FLOW; SURVEYING;

HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; PHYSICALLY BASED DISTRIBUTED MODEL; RIVER FLOW; SPATIAL GRID RESOLUTION; TSURUMI RIVER; YOM RIVER;

RIVERS;

FLOOD FORECASTING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PEAK FLOW; RIVER BASIN; RIVER FLOW; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

EID: 61849132868     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7183     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abbott MB, Refsgaard JC. 1996. Distributed Hydrologic Modeling. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Netherland; 336.
2. Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ. 1979. A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrologic Science Bulletin 24: 43-60.
3. Brater EF, King HW, Lindell JE, Wei CY. 1996. Handbook of Hydraulics, 7th edn. McGraw Hill: NY, USA.
4. Braun P, Molnar T, Kleeberg HB. 1997. The problem of scaling in grid-related hydrological process modelling. Hydrological Processes 11: 1219-1230.
5. Bruneau P, Gascuel-Odoux C, Robin P, Merot P, Beven K. 1995. Sensitivity to space and time resolution of a hydrological model using digital elevation data. Hydrological Processes 9: 55-67.
6. Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW. 1988. Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill: New York.
7. Dickinson R, Sellers AH, Kennedy PJ. 1993. Biosphere Atmosphere Transfer Schemes (BATS) As Coupled to the Community Climate Model. National Center for Atmospheric Research: Boulder, CO, NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-383+STR.
8. Doe WW, Harmon RS. 2001. Introduction to soil erosion and landscape evolution modeling. In Landscape Erosion and Evolution Modeling, Harmon RS, Doe WW (eds). Kluwer Academic/Plenum: New York; 1-14.
9. Dutta D, Herath S. 2004. Trend of Floods in Asia and a Proposal for Flood Risk Management with Integrated River Basin Approach. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Asia-Pacific Hydrology and Water Resources Association, Singapore, I, 128-137.
10. Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K. 2000. Flood inundation simulation in a river basin using a physically based distributed hydrological model. Hydrological Processes 14: 497-520.
11. Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K. 2003. A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. Journal of Hydrology 277(1-2): 24-49.
12. EIC. 1998. Thailand on a Disc (CD-ROM). Environmental Information Center, Thailand Environment Institute: Thailand.
13. Fread DL. 1988. The NWS DAMBREAK Model: Theoretical Background/User Documentation. National Weather Service (NWS), NOAA: USA.
14. FRIS. 2001. River Basin Management Plan for the Tsurumi River Basin. Foundation for Riverfront Improvement and Restoration, Foundation for Riverfront Improvement and Restoration, Keihin Work Office, Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport: Japan, ISBN 4-947726-25-3, 420, (in Japanese).
15. Garbrecht J, Martz L. 1994. Grid size dependency of parameters extracted from digital elevation models. Computers & Geosciences 20: 85-87.
16. GSDT. 2000. Global Soil Data Products CD-ROM (IGBP-DIS). CDROM. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, Global Soil Data Task, Data and Information System, Potsdam, Germany, Available from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, [http://www.daac.ornl.gov].
17. Herath S, Dutta D, Wijesekara S. 2003. A coupled river and inundation modeling scheme for efficient flood forecasting. Journal of Geoinformatics, Japan Society of Geoinformatics 14(1): 37-42.
18. Hessel R. 2005. Effects of grid cell size and time step length on simulation results of the Limburg soil erosion model (LISEM). Hydrological Processes 19: 3037-3049.
19. Jha R, Herath S, Musiake K. 1997. Development of IIS distributed hydrological model (IISDHM) and its application in Chao Phraya River basin, Thailand. Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE 41: 227-232.
20. Jha R, Herath S, Musiake K. 1998. Application of IIS distributed hydrological model (IISDHM) in Nakhon Sawan, Thailand. Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE 42: 145-150.
21. Kenward T, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF, Fielding E. 2000. Effects of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrologic predictions. Remote Sensing and Environment 74: 433-444.
22. Kristensen K, Jensen S. 1975. A model for estimating actual evapo-transpiration from potential evapotranspiration. Nordic Hydrology 6: 70-88.
23. Nakayama K, Dutta D, Tanaka G, Khanam F. 2005. A comparative analysis of river flow modeling in an urban river basin in japan using lumped and physically based approaches. Proceedings of the MTERM International Conference. Asian Institute of Technology: Bangkok, Thailand, 207-214.
24. O'Loughlin EM. 1986. Prediction of surface saturation zones in natural catchments by topographic analysis. Water Resources Research 22: 794-804.
25. Sivapalan M, Grayson R, Woods R. 2004. Scale and scaling in hydrology. Hydrological Processes 18: 1369-1371.
26. Storck P, Bowling LC, Wetherbee P, Lettenmaier DP. 1998. Application of a GIS-based hydrology model for prediction of forest harvest effects on peak streamflow in the Pacific Northwest. Hydrological Processes 12: 889-904.
27. V'azquez RF, Feyen L, Feyen J, Refsgaard JC. 2002. Effect of grid size on effective parameters and model performance of the MIKE-SHE code. Hydrological Processes 16: 355-372.
28. Wolock DM, Price CV. 1994. Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography-based watershed model. Water Resources Research 30: 3041-3052.
29. Yin Z-Y, Wang X. 1999. A cross-scale comparison of drainage basin characteristics derived from digital elevation models. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 24: 557-562.
30. Zhang W, Montgomery DR. 1994. Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation and hydrologic simulations. Water Resources Research 30: 1019-1028.