Parametric sensitivity: A case study comparison

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 53, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 2640-2652

  Sulieman, H ^a   Kucuk, I ^a   McLellan, P J ^b  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF SHARJAH   (United Arab Emirates)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT; LINEAR SYSTEMS;

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS; COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS; DATA ANALYSIS; FOURIER; FOURIER AMPLITUDE SENSITIVITY TESTS; MODEL PARAMETERS; MODEL SYSTEMS; MULTI RESPONSE; NON LINEARITIES; NON-LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; NONLINEAR REGRESSION MODELS; PARAMETER DEPENDENCIES; PARAMETRIC SENSITIVITIES; REGRESSION ESTIMATIONS; REGRESSION MODELS; SENSITIVITY METHODS;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 61849116782     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bates D.M., and Watts D.G. Nonlinear Regression Analysis and its Applications (1988), Wiley, New York
2. Bates D.M., and Watts D.G. A generalized Gauss-Newton procedure for multi-response parameter estimation. SIAM Journal of Scientific and Statistical Computing 7 1 (1987) 49-55
3. Biegler L.T., and Tjoa I.B. Simultaneous solution and optimization strategies for parameter estimation of differential-algebraic equation systems. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 30 (1991) 376-385
4. Biegler L.T., Damiano J.J., and Blau G.E. Nonlinear parameter estimation: A case study comparison. AIChE Journal 32 1 (1986) 29-45
5. Box G.E.P., and Draper N. The Bayesian estimation of common parameters from several responses. Biometrika 52 (1965) 355-365
6. Cacuci D.G., and Ionescu-Bujor M. A comparative review of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of large-scale systems II: Statistical methods. Nuclear Science and Engineering 147 (2004) 204-217
7. Colonna G., Longo S., Esposito F., and Capitelli M. Fourier-transform sensitivity analysis application to XeCl self-sustained discharge-laser kinetics. Applied Physics B: Laser and Optics 59 1 (1994) 61-72
8. Cukier R.I., Levine H.B., and Shuler K.E. Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems: Review. Journal of Computational Physics 26 (1978) 1-42
9. Cukier R.I., Schaibly J.H., and Shuler K.E. III. Analysis of the approximations. Journal of Chemical Physics 63 3 (1975) 1140-1149
10. Cukier R.I., Fortuin C.M., Shuler K.E., Petschek A.G., and Schaibly J.H. Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction system to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I, Theory. Journal of Chemical Physics 59 8 (1973) 3873-3878
11. Deflandre A., Williams R.J., Elorza F.J., Mira J., and Boorman D.B. Analysis of the QUESTOR water quality model using a Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) for two UK rivers. Science of the Total Environment 360 1-3 (2006) 290-304
12. Dunker A.M. The decoupled direct method for calculating sensitivity coefficients in chemical kinetics. Journal of Chemical Physics 81 (1984) 2385-2393
13. Guay M., and McLean D.D. Optimization and sensitivity analysis for multiresponse parameter estimation in systems of ordinary differential equations. Computers & Chemical Engineering 19 12 (1995) 1271-1285
14. Haaker M.P.R., and Verheijen P.J. Local and global sensitivity analysis for a reactor design with parameter uncertainty. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 82 A5 (2004) 591-598
15. Koda M., McRae G.J., and Seifeld J.H. Automatic sensitivity analysis of kinetic mechanisms. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 11 (1979) 427-444
16. Liu Y., and Avissar R. Sensitivity of shallow convective precipitation by land surface heterogeneities to dynamical and cloud microphysical parameters. Journal of Geophysical Reserach 101 D3 (1996) 7477-7497
17. Lu Y., and Mohanty S. Sensitivity analysis of a complex proposed geologic waste disposal system using the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test method. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 72 (2001) 275-291
18. McRae G.J., Tilden J.W., and Seinfeld J.H. Global sensitivity analysis-A computational implementation of the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST). Computers & Chemical Engineering 6 1 (1982) 15-25
19. Rodriguez-Camind E., and Avissar R. Comparsion of three land-surface schemes with the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST). Tellus 50A 3 (1998) 313-332
20. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Tarantola S., and Campolongo F. Sensitivity analysis practices: Strategies for model-based inference. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 91 (2006) 1109-1125
21. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Campolongo F., and Ratto M. Sensitivity Analysis in Practice. A Guide to Assessing Scientfic Models (2004), Wiley, New York, USA
22. Saltelli A., Chan K., and Scott E.M. Sensitivity Analysis (2000), Wiley, New York, USA
23. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., and Campolongo F. Sensitivity analysis as an ingredient of modeling. Statistical Science 15 4 (2000) 337-395
24. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., and Chan K. A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics 41 (1999) 39-56
25. Seber G.A.F., and Wild C.J. Nonlinear Regression (1989), Wiley, New York
26. Schaibly J.H., and Shuler K.E. Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction system to uncertainties in rate coefficients. II. Applications. Journal of Chemical Physics 59 8 (1973) 3879-3888
27. Sulieman H., McLellan P.J., and Bacon D.W. A Profile-based approach to parametric sensitivity in multiresponse regression models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 45 (2004) 721-740
28. Sulieman H., McLellan P.J., and Bacon D.W. A profile-based approach to parametric sensitivity analysis of nonlinear regression models. Technometrics 43 4 (2001) 425-433
29. Xu C., and Gertner G. Extending a global sensitivity analysis technique to models with correlated parameters. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 51 12 (2007) 5579-5590