Prediction of the strength and elasticity modulus of gypsum using multiple regression, ANN, and ANFIS models

International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 803-810

  Yilmaz, Işik ^a   Yuksek, Gürkan ^a  

^a CUMHURIYET UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ELASTIC MODULUS; GYPSUM; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; STRENGTH;

EID: 61849112830     PISSN: 13651609     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Yilmaz I. Indirect estimation of the swelling percent and a new classification of soils depending on liquid limit and cation exchange capacity. Eng Geol 85 (2006) 295-301
2. Schmidt E. A non-destructive concrete tester. Concrete 59 (1951) 34-35
3. Miller RP. Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, 1965.
4. Deere DU, Miller RP. Engineering classification and index properties for intact rocks. Tech Rep, Air Force Weapons Lab, New Mexico, No AFNL-TR 1966; p. 65-116.
5. Ege JR, Miller DR, Danilchik W. Schmidt hammer test method for field determination of physical properties of zeolitized tuff. USGS Open-file Rep 1490, 1970; p. 40.
6. Aufmuth R.E. A systematic determination of engineering criteria for rocks. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 11 (1973) 235-245
7. Beverly BE, Schoenwolf DA, Brierly GS. Correlations of rock index values with engineering properties and the classification of intact rock. 1979.
8. Kidybinski A. Bursting liability indices of coal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 17 (1980) 167-171
9. Singh RN, Hassani FP, Elkington PAS. The application of strength and deformation index testing to the stability assessment of coal measures excavations. In: Proceedings of the 24th US Rock Mechanics Symposium, Texas A&M University, AEG; 1983. p. 599-609.
10. Shorey P.R., Barat D., Das M.N., Mukherjee K.P., and Singh B. Schmidt hammer rebound data for estimation of large scale in-situ coal strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 21 (1984) 39-42
11. Haramy K.Y., and DeMarco M.J. Use of Schmidt hammer for rock and coal testing. Proceedings of the 26th US Rock Mechanics Symposium, Rapid City, SD (1985), Balkema, Rotterdam 549-555
12. Ghose A.K., and Chakraborti S. Empirical strength indices of Indian coals-an investigation. Proceedings of the 27th US Rock Mechanics Symposium (1986), Balkema, Rotterdam 59-61
13. O'Rourke J.E. Rock index properties for geoengineering in underground development. Min Eng (1989) 106-110
14. Sachpazis C.I. Correlating Schmidt hardness with compressive strength and Young' s modulus of carbonate rocks. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 42 (1990) 75-83
15. Cargill J.S., and Shakoor A. Evaluation of empirical methods for measuring the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 27 (1990) 495-503
16. Xu S., Grasso P., and Mahtab A. Use of Schmidt hammer for estimating mechanical properties of weak rock. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress IAEG (1990), Balkema, Rotterdam 511-519
17. Gokceoglu C. Schmidt sertlik çekici kullani{dotless}larak tahmin edilen tek eksenli basi{dotless}nç dayani{dotless}mi{dotless} verilerinin güvenilirliǧi üzerine bir deǧerlendirme. Jeol Mühendisliǧi 48 (1996) 78-81 [in Turkish]
18. Kahraman S. Basi{dotless}nç direnci tahmininde Schmidt ve nokta yük indeksi kullanmani{dotless}n güvenilirliǧi. K.T.Ü. Jeoloji Mühendisliǧi Bölümü 30. In: Korkmaz S, ve Akçay M, editors. Yi{dotless}l Sempozyumu, Bildiriler Kitabi{dotless}, Trabzon; 1996. p. 362-69. (in Turkish)
19. Katz O., Reches Z., and Roegiers J.C. Evaluation of mechanical rock properties using a Schmidt hammer. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37 (2000) 723-728
20. Yilmaz I., and Sendir H. Correlation of Schmidt hardness with unconfined compressive strength and elasticity modulus in gypsum from Sivas (Turkey). Eng Geol 66 (2002) 211-219
21. D'Andrea D.V., Fisher R.L., and Fogelson D.E. Prediction of compression strength from other rock properties. Colo Sch Mines Q 59 4b (1964) 623-640
22. Broch E. The influence of water on some rock properties. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Congress ISRM. Vol. 2 (Part A), Denver: 1974, p. 33-8.
23. Bieniawski Z.T. Point load test in geotechnical practice. Eng Geol 9 (1975) 1-11
24. Read JRL, Thornten PN, Regan WM. A rational approach to the point load test. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Australia-New Zealand geomechanics conference. Vol. 2, 1980. p. 35-9.
25. Singh DP. Determination of some engineering properties of weak rocks. In: Proceedings of the international Symposium on weak rock, Tokyo: 1981. p. 21-4.
26. Gunsallus K.L., and Kulhawy F.H. A comparative evaluation of rock strength measures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 21 (1984) 233-248
27. Grasso P., Xu S., and Mahtab A. Problems and promises of index testing of rocks. In: Tillerson, and Waversik (Eds). Proceedings of the 33rd US Rock Mechanics Symposium (1992), Balkema, Rotterdam 879-888
28. Smith H.J. The point load test for weak rock in dredging applications. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34 3-4 (1997) 702
29. Quane S.L., and Russel J.K. Rock strength as a metric of welding intensity in pyroclastic deposits. Eur J Mineral 15 (2003) 855-864
30. Tsiambaos G., and Sabatakakis N. Considerations on strength of intact sedimentary rocks. Eng Geol 72 (2004) 261-273
31. Palchik V., and Hatzor Y.H. The influence of porosity on tensile and compressive strength of porous chalk. Rock Mech Rock Eng 37 4 (2004) 331-341
32. Fener M., Kahraman S., Bilgili A., and Gunaydin O. A comparative evaluation of indirect methods to estimate the compressive strength of rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38 4 (2005) 329-343
33. Entwistle D.C., Hobbs P.R.N., Jones L.D., Gunn D., and Raines M.G. The relationships between effective porosity, uniaxial compressive strength and sonic velocity of intact Borrowdale Volcanic Group core samples from Sellafield. Geotech Geol Eng 23 (2005) 793-809
34. Freyburg E. Der Untere und mittlere Buntsandstein SW. Thuringenin seinen gesteinstechnischen Eigenschaften. Ber Dte Ges Geol Wiss A 176 (1972) 911-919
35. McCann D.M., Culshaw M.G., and Northmore K.J. Rock mass assessment from seismic measurements. In: Bell F.G., Culshaw M.G., Cripps J.C., and Coffey J.R. (Eds). Fields testing in engineering geology Vol. 6 (1990), Geol Soc Eng Spec Pub 257-266
36. Fjaer E., Holt R.M., Horsrud P., Raaen A.M., and Risnes R. Petroleum related rock mechanics (1992), Elsevier, Amsterdam
37. Moos D., Peska P., Finkbeiner T., and Zoback M.D. Comprehensive wellbore stability analysis utilizing quantitative risk assessment. J Petrol Sci Eng 38 (2003) 97-110
38. Chang C. Empirical rock strength logging in boreholes penetrating sedimentary formations. Geophys Explor 7 3 (2004) 174-183
39. Poole R.W., and Farmer I.W. Consistency and repeatability of Schmidt hammer rebound data during field testing. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 17 (1980) 167-171
40. Gokceoglu C. A fuzzy triangular chart to predict the uniaxial compressive strength of Ankara agglomerates from their petrographic composition. Eng Geol 66 (2002) 39-51
41. Goodman R.E. Introduction to rock mechanics. 2nd ed. (1989), Wiley, New York
42. Jin Y., and Jiang J. Techniques in neural-network based fuzzy system identification and their application to control of complex systems. In: Leondes C.T. (Ed). Fuzzy theory systems, techniques and applications (1999), Academic Press, New York 112-128
43. Yilmaz I. Gypsum/anhydrite: some engineering problems. Bull Eng Geol Environ 60 3 (2001) 227-230
44. Kurtman F. Sivas-Hafik-Zara ve İmranli{dotless} bölgesinin jeolojik ve tektonik yapi{dotless}si{dotless}. MTA Dergisi 80 (1973) 1-32 [in Turkish]
45. Karacan E., and Yilmaz I. Collapse dolines in the Miocene gypsum: an example from SW Sivas (Turkey). Environ Geol 29 3/4 (1997) 263-266
46. Karacan E., and Yilmaz I. Geotechnical evaluation of the Miocene gypsum from Sivas (Turkey). Geotech Geol Eng 18 2 (2000) 79-90
47. Yilmaz I., and Karacan E. Slaking durability and its effect on the doline occurrence in the gypsum. Environ Geol 47 7 (2005) 1010-1016
48. Yilmaz I. Differences on the geotechnical properties of the two types of gypsum: alabastrine and porphyritic. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66 2 (2007) 187-195
49. Yilmaz I. GIS based susceptibility mapping of karst depression in gypsum: a case study from Sivas basin (Turkey). Eng Geol 90 (2007) 89-103
50. ISRM (International Society for Rock Mechanics). In: Brown E.T. (Ed). Rock characterization, testing and monitoring-ISRM suggested methods (1981), Pergamon, Oxford 211
51. ISRM (International Society for Rock Mechanics). Suggested method for determinin point load strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 22 2 (1985) 51-60
52. Alvarez G.M., and Babuska R. Fuzzy model for the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of rock samples. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36 (1999) 339-349
53. Finol J., Guo Y.K., and Jing X.D. A rule based fuzzy model for the prediction of petrophysical rock parameters. J Petrol Sci Eng 29 (2001) 97-113
54. Gokceoglu C., and Zorlu K. A fuzzy model to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and the modulus of elasticity of a problematic rock. Eng Appl Artif Intell 17 (2004) 61-72
55. Yilmaz I, Yuksek AG. An example of artificial neural network application for indirect estimation of rock parameters. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2007, doi:10.1007/s00603-007-0138-7.
56. Singh T.N., Kanchan R., Verma A.K., and Singh S. An intelligent approach for prediction of triaxial properties using unconfined uniaxial strength. Min Eng J 5 (2003) 12-16
57. Simpson P.K. Artificial neural system-foundation, paradigm, application and implementation (1990), Pergamon, New York
58. Matlab 7.1. Software for technical computing and model-based design (2005), The MathWorks Inc.
59. SPSS 10.0.1. Statistical analysis software (Standard Version) (1999), SPSS Inc.