From the editor: Readdressing the age-old question: What to study?

Academy of Management Learning and Education

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 153-157

  Waldman, David A ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61849112204     PISSN: 1537260X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMLE.2008.32712614     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Arbaugh, J. B. 2008. Starting the long march to legitimacy. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7: 5-8.
2. Campbell, J. P., Daft, R. L., & Hulin, C. L. 1982. What to study: Generating and developing research questions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3. Feldman, D. C. 2005. The food's no good and they don't give us enough: Reflections on Mintzberg's critique of MBA education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4: 217-220.
4. Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4: 75-91.
5. Greenwald, A. G. 1997. Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist, 52: 1182-1186.
6. Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. 2005. Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52: 1209-1217.
7. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. 2004. Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology. 89: 755-768.
8. Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. 2006. The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59: 623-664.
9. Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Antonioni, D. 1998. Has 360 degree feedback gone amok? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2): 86-94.