Pattern-based recognition of heparin contaminants by an array of self-assembling fluorescent receptors

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 48, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1995-1997

  Jagt, Richard B C ^a   Gómez Biagi, Rodolfo F ^a   Nitz, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Fluorescence; Heparin; Molecular recognition; Receptors; Self assembly

Indexed keywords

ANTI-COAGULANT DRUGS; BINDING MOTIFS; CHARGED CONTAMINANTS; HEPARIN; HOST-GUEST INTERACTIONS; HYDROPHOBIC GUESTS; MODULAR APPROACHES; RECEPTORS; SELF-ASSEMBLING;

DRUG INTERACTIONS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; POLYSACCHARIDES; SELF ASSEMBLY;

FLUORESCENCE;

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; CYCLODEXTRIN; FLUORESCENT DYE; HEPARIN; POLYMER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; DRUG CONTAMINATION;

ANTICOAGULANTS; CYCLODEXTRINS; DRUG CONTAMINATION; FLUORESCENT DYES; HEPARIN; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; POLYMERS;

EID: 61849101764     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200805238     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. a) Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 589 (Editorial);
2. b) D. B. Blossom, A. J. Kallen, P. R. Patel, A. Elward, L. Robinson, G. Gao, R. Langer, K. M. Perkins, J. L. Jaeger, K. M. Kurkjian, M. Jones, S. F. Schillie, N. Shehab, D. Ketterer, G. Venkataraman, T. K. Kishimoto, Z. Shriver, A. W. McMahon, K. F. Austen, S. Kozlowski, A. Srinivasan, G. Turabelidze, C. V. Gould, M. J. Arduino, R. Sasisekharan, N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 2674-2684.
3. M. Guerrini, D. Beccati, Z. Shriver, A. Naggi, K. Viswanathan, A. Bisio, I. Capila, J. C. Lansing, S. Guglieri, B. Fraser, A. Al-Hakim, N. Sibel Gunay, Z. Zhang, L. Robinson, L. Buhse, M. Nasr, J. Woodcock, R. Langer, G. Venkataraman, R. J. Linhardt, B. Casu, G. Torri, R. Sasisekharan, Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 669-675.
4. T. Maruyama, T. Toida, T. Imanari, G. Yu, R. J. Linhardt, Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 306, 35-43.
5. a) S. Alban, S. Lühn, N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 2732-2734;
6. b) C. Tami, M. Puig, J. C. Reepmeyer, H. Ye, D. A. D'Avignon, L. Buhse, D. Verthelyi, Biomaterials 2008, 29, 4808-4814.
7. A. T. Wright, E. V. Anslyn, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 14-28.
8. E. V. Anslyn, J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 687-699.
9. For reviews, see: a) B. T. Nguyen, E. V. Anslyn, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 3118-3127;
10. b) F. Mancin, E. Rampazzo, P. Tecilla, U. Tonellato, Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1844-1854;
11. c) L. Fabbrizzi, M. Licchelli, A. Taglietti, Dalton Trans. 2003, 3471-3479.
12. a) Z. Zhong, E. V. Anslyn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9014-9015;
13. b) A. T. Wright, Z. L. Zhong, E. V. Anslyn, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 5825-5828;
14. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5679-5682.
15. a) J. C. Sauceda, R. M. Duke, M. Nitz, ChemBioChem 2007, 8, 391-394;
16. b) M. Nitz, A. Rullo, M. X.-H. Ding, ChemBioChem 2008, 9, 1545-1548.
17. Y. Egawa, R. Hayashida, T. Seki, J.-i. Anzai, Talanta 2008, 76, 736-741.
18. K.-Y. Pu, B. Liu, Macromolecules 2008, 41, 6636-6640.
19. a) S. Wang, Y.-T. Chang, Chem. Commun. 2008, 1173-1175;
20. b) M. Wang, D. Zhang, G. Zhang, D. Zhu, Chem. Commun. 2008, 4469-4469.
21. a) M. Gomez-Garcia, J. M. Benito, D. Rodriguez-Lucena, J. X. Yu, K. Chmurski, C. O. Mellet, R. G. Gallego, A. Maestre, J. Defaye, J. M. G. Fernandez, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7970-7971;
22. b) A. Steffen, C. Thiele, S. Tietze, C. Strassnig, A. Kamper, T. Lengauer, G. Wenz, J. Apostolakis, Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 6801-6809;
23. c) V. A. Karginov, A. Yohannes, T. M. Robinson, N. E. Fahmi, K. Alibek, S. M. Hecht, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 33-40.
24. R. F. Gómez Biagi, R. B. C. Jagt, M. Nitz, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 4622-4626.
25. L. Zhang, Y. Wu, L. Brunsveld, Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 1830-1834;
26. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1798-1802.
27. Z. W. Yang, R. Breslow, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 6171-6172.
28. See the Supporting Information for details.
29. SYSTAT, version 12.0, Systat Software Inc., Richmond, CA, USA.
30. P. C. Jurs, G. A. Bakken, H. E. McClelland, Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2649-2678.
31. One measurement at a time was treated as an unknown, and the remainder were used as the training set.
32. The predictive ability of the receptor array was determined by a cross-validation routine, in which 50% of the dataset was taken out randomly and used as a training set for the LDA, and the omitted remainder was reclassified.