An assessment of plant-based measures of grapevine performance as irrigation scheduling tools

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 792, Issue , 2008, Pages 421-427

  Loveys, B R ^a   Theobald, J C ^b   Jones, H G ^c   McCarthy, M G ^d  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^d SOUTH AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Infrared thermometry; Stomatal conductance; Water potential

Indexed keywords

VITIS;

EID: 61849100538     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.792.49     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Campbell, C.S. and McInnes, K.J. 1999. Response of in situ Psychrometer to cuticle removal by abrasion. Agron. J. 91:859-862.
2. Choné, X., Van Leeuwen, C. Dubourdieu, D. and Gaudillère, J.P. 2001. Stem water potential is a sensitive indicator of grapevine water status. Ann. Botany 87:477-483.
3. Cifre, J., Bota, J., Escalona, J.M., Medrano, H. and Flexas, J. 2005. Physiological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): an open gate to improve water use efficiency? Agri. Ecosys. Environ. 106:159-170.
4. Comstock, J.P. 2000. Correction of thermocouple psychrometer readings for the interaction of temperature and actual water potential. Crop Science 40:709-712.
5. Escalona, J.M., Flexass, J. and Medrano, H. 2002. Drought effects on water flow, photosynthesis and growth of potted grapevines. Vitis 41:57-62.
6. Fuente, S., Conroy, J.P., Kelly, G., Rogers, G. and Collins, M. 2005. Use of infrared thermography to assess spatial and temporal variability of stomatal conductance of grapevines under partial rootzone drying: an irrigation scheduling application. Acta Hort. 689:309-316.
7. Ginestar, C., Eastham, J., Gray, S. and Iland, P. 1998. Use of sap flow sensors to schedule vineyard irrigation. I. Effects of post-veraison water deficit and water relations, vine growth and yield of Shiraz grapevines. Amer. J. Enology Vitic. 49:413-420.
8. Jones, H.G. 1999. Use of infrared thermometry for estimation of stomatal conductance in irrigation scheduling. Agri. For. Meteorol. 95:135-149. Jones, H.G., Stoll, M., Santos, T., de Sousa, C., Chaves, M.M. and Grant, O.M. 2002. Use of infrared thermography for monitoring stomatal closure in the field: application to grapevine J. Exp. Bot. 53:2249-2260.
9. th Aust. Wine Industry Techn. Conf. Melbourne, Australia 24-29 July. p. 45-50.
10. Schultz, H.R. 2003. Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L cultivars during drought. Plant, Cell Envir. 26: 1393-1405.
11. Soar, C.J., Speirs, J., Maffei, S.M., Penrose, A.B., McCarthy, M.G., and Loveys, B.R. 2006. Grape vine varieties, Shiraz and Grenache, differ in their stomatal response to VPD: apparent links with ABA physiology and gene expression in leaf tissue. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 12:2-12.