Tolerance traits and the stability of mutualism

Oikos

Volumn 118, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 346-352

  Oliver, Tom H ^a   Leather, Simon R ^b   Cook, James M ^c  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANT; ANTAGONISM; APHID; ARMS RACE; DEFENSE MECHANISM; FITNESS; GENOTYPE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; MUTUALISM; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; TOLERANCE;

APHIDIDAE; CUCUMIS MELO VAR. INODORUS; FORMICIDAE;

EID: 61849095180     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17045.x     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Arakaki, N. 1989. Alarm pheromone eliciting attack and escape response in the sugar cane woolly aphid, Ceratovacuna langiera (Homoptera: Pemphigidae) J. Ethol. 7 : 83 90.
2. Axelrod, R. Hamilton, W. D. 1981. The evolution of cooperation Science 211 : 1390 1396.
3. Banks, C. J. Nixon, H. L. 1958. Effects of the ant, Lasius niger L., on the feeding and excretion of the bean aphid, Aphis fabae Scop J. Exp. Biol. 35 : 703 711.
4. Bonser, R. et al. 1998. Optimal patch use by foraging workers of Lasius fuliginosus, L. niger and Myrmica rugidinosus Ecol. Entomol. 23 : 15 21.
5. Bot, A. N. M. et al. 2001. Partial incompatability between ants and symbiotic fungi in two sympatric species of Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants Evolution 55 : 1980 1991.
6. Bristow, C. M. 1991. Why are so few aphids ant-tended? Huxley, C. R. Cutler, D. F. Ant-plant interactions. Oxford Univ. Press 101 119.
7. Bronstein, J. L. 1994. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions Trends Ecol. Evol. 9 : 214 217.
8. Brouat, C. et al. 2001. Plant lock and ant key: pairwise coevolution of an exclusion filter in an ant-plant mutualism Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268 : 2131 2141.
9. Broughton, W. J. et al. 2000. Keys to symbiotic harmony J. Bacteriol. 182 : 5641 5652.
10. Bruno, J. F. et al. 2003. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 : 119 125.
11. Bshary, R. Grutter, A. S. 2005. Punishment and partner switching cause cooperative behaviour in a cleaning mutualism Biol. Lett. 1 : 396 399.
12. Buckley, R. C. 1987. Interactions involving plants, Homoptera and ants Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18 : 111 135.
13. Bull, J. J. Rice, W. R. 1991. Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation J. Theor. Biol. 149 : 63 74.
14. Christian, C. E. 2001. Consequences of a biological invasion reveal the importance of mutualism for plant communities Nature 413 : 635 639.
15. Clayton, D. H. et al. 1999. Reciprocal natural selection on host-parasite phenotypes Am. Nat. 154 : 261 270.
16. Connor, R. C. 1995. The benefits of mutualism: a conceptual framework Biol. Rev. 70 : 427 457.
17. Cook, J. M. Rasplus, J. 2003. Mutualists with attitude: coevolving fig wasps and figs Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 : 241 248.
18. Darwin, C. 1859. Instinct. The origin of species. Wordsworth Editions Ltd 159 186 1998.
19. Dawkins, R. Krebs, J. R. 1979. Arms races between and within species Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 205 : 489 511.
20. De Mazancourt, C. et al. 2005. Understanding mutualism when there is adaptation to the partner J. Ecol. 93 : 305.
21. Del-Claro, K. Oliveira, P. S. 1993. Ant-Homoptera interactions: do alternative sugar sources distract tending ants? Oikos 68 : 202 206.
22. Delabie, J. H. C. 2001. Trophobiosis between Formicidae and Hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha and Auchenorrhyncha): an overview Neotrop. Entomol. 30 : 501 516.
23. Dixon, A. F. G. 1998. Aphid ecology: an optimisation approach. Chapman and Hall.
24. Edinger, B. B. 1985. Conditional mutualism in three aphid- tending ants Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 66 : 168.
25. Edwards, D. P. et al. 2006. Selection for protection in an ant-plant mutualism: host sanctions, host modularity, and the principal-agent game Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273 : 595 602.
26. Fineblum, W. L. Rausher, M. D. 1995. Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory Nature 377 : 517 520.
27. Fischer, M. K. Shingleton, A. W. 2001. Host plant and ants influence the honeydew sugar composition of aphids Funct. Ecol. 15 : 544 550.
28. Fischer, M. K. et al. 2001. Competition for mutualists in an ant-Homopteran interaction mediated by hierarchies of ant attendance Oikos 92 : 531 541.
29. Fischer, M. K. et al. 2005. Honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition of polyphagous black bean aphid, Aphis fabae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on various host plants and implications for ant-attendance Eur. J. Entomol. 102 : 155 160.
30. Gomulkiewicz, R. et al. 2003. Coevolution in variable mutualisms Am. Nat. suppl. 162 : S80 93.
31. Hay, M. E. et al. 2004. Mutualisms and aquatic community structure: the enemy of my enemy is my friend Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 35 : 175 197.
32. Herre, E. A. 1993. Population structure and the evolution of virulence in nematode parasites of fig wasps Science 259 : 1442 1445.
33. Herre, E. A. et al. 1999. The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 : 49 53.
34. Hoeksema, J. D. Bruna, E. M. 2000. Pursuing the big questions about interspecific mutualism: a review of theoretical approaches Oecologia 125 : 321 330.
35. Hoeksema, J. D. Kummel, M. 2003. Ecological persistence of the plant-mycorrhizal mutualism: a hypothesis from species coexistence theory Am. Nat. 162 : 321 330.
36. Janzen, D. H. 1979. How to be a fig Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10 : 13 51.
37. Janzen, D. H. 1985. The natural history of mutualisms Boucher, D. H. The biology of mutualisms. Oxford Univ. Press 40 99.
38. Jeon, K. W. 1972. Development of cellular dependence of infective organisms: micrurgical studies in amoebaes Science 176 : 1122 1123.
39. Johnstone, R. Bshary, R. 2002. From parasitism to mutualism: partner control in asymmetric interactions Ecol. Lett. 5 : 634 639.
40. Jousselin, E. et al. 2001. Shift to mutualism in parasitic lineages of the fig/fig wasp interaction Oikos 94 : 287 294.
41. Juenger, T. Lennartsson, T. 2000. Tolerance in plant ecology and evolution: toward a more unified theory of plant-herbivore interaction Evol. Ecol. 14 : 283 287.
42. Katayama, N. Suzuki, N. 2003. Changes in the use of extrafloral nectaries of Vicia faba (Leguminosae) and honeydew of aphids by ants with increasing aphid density Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 96 : 579 584.
43. Keeler, K. H. 1981. A model of selection for facultative nonsymbiotic mutualism Am. Nat. 118 : 488 498.
44. Kiers, E. T. et al. 2003. Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism Nature 425 : 78 81.
45. Koskela, T. et al. 2002. Resistance and tolerance in a host plant-holoparasitic interaction: genetic variation and costs Evolution 56 : 899 908.
46. Kunert, G. et al. 2005. Alarm pheromone mediates production of winged dispersal morphs in aphids Ecol. Lett. 8 : 596 603.
47. Leather, S. R. 2000. Herbivory, phenology, morphology and the expression of sex in trees: who is in the driver's seat? Oikos 90 : 194 196.
48. Losey, J. E. Denno, R. F. 1998. The escape response of pea aphids to foliar-forgaging predators: factors affecting dropping behaviour Ecol. Entomol. 25 : 53 61.
49. Mailleux, A.-C. et al. 2003. Regulation of ants' foraging to resource productivity Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270 : 1609 1616.
50. Margulis, L. Fester, R. 1991. Symbiosis as a source of evolutionary innovation: speciation and morphogenesis. MIT Press.
51. Matsuda, H. Shimada, M. 1993. Cost-benefit model for the evolution of symbiosis Kawanabe, H. Mutualism and community organisation. Oxford Univ. Press.
52. Mauricio, R. et al. 1997. Variation in the defence strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78 : 1301 1310.
53. Miller, M. R. Boots, M. 2005. The evolution of host resistance: tolerance and control as distinct strategies J. Theor. Biol. 236 : 198 207.
54. Miller, M. R. et al. 2006. The evolution of parasites in response to tolerance in their hosts: the good, the bad, and apparent commensalism Evolution 60 : 945 956.
55. Mondor, E. B. et al. 2005. Predator-induced transgenerational phenotypic plasticity in the cotton aphid Oecologia 142 : 104 108.
56. Nilson, L. A. 1988. The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes Nature 334 : 147 149.
57. Normark, B. H. Normark, S. 2002. Evolution and spread of antibiotic resistance J. Internal Med. 252 : 91 106.
58. Offenberg, J. H. 2001. Balancing between mutualism and exploitation: the symbiotic interaction between Lasius ants and aphids Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49 : 304 310.
59. Painter, R. H. 1958. Resistance of plants to insects Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3 : 367 390.
60. Pellmyr, O. Huth, C. J. 1994. Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths Nature 372 : 257 260.
61. Portha, S. et al. 2004. How food type and brood influence foraging decisions of Lasius niger scouts Anim. Behav. 68 : 115 122.
62. Price, P. W. 1997. Insect ecology. Wiley.
63. Råberg, L. et al. 2007. Disentangling genetic variation for resistance and tolerance to infectious diseases in animals Science 318 : 812 814.
64. Rausher, M. D. 2001. Co-evolution and plant resistance to natural enemies Nature 411 : 857 864.
65. Rausher, M. D. Simms, E. L. 1989. The evolution of resistance to herbivory in Ipomoea purpurea. I. Attempts to detect selection Evolution 43 : 563 572.
66. Restif, O. Koella, J. C. 2004. Concurrent evolution of resistance and tolerance to pathogens Am. Nat. 164 : E90 E6102.
67. Roitberg, B. D. Myers, J. H. 1978. Adaptation of alarm pheromone responses of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) Can. J. Zool. 56 : 103 108.
68. Rosenthal, J. P. Kotanen, P. M. 1994. Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory Trends Ecol. Evol. 9 : 146 148.
69. Roughgarden, J. 1975. Evolution of a marine symbiosis - a simple cost-benefit model Ecology 56 : 1201 1208.
70. Roy, B. A. Kirchner, J. W. 2000. Evolutionary dynamics of pathogen resistance and tolerance Evolution 54 : 51 63.
71. Saikkonen, K. et al. 1998. Fungal endophytes: a continuum of interactions with host plants Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29 : 319 343.
72. Sakata, H. 1995. Density-dependent predation of the ant Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on two attended aphids Lachnus tropicalis and Myzocallis kuricola (Homoptera: Aphididae) Res. Popul. Ecol. 37 : 159 164.
73. Sakata, H. 1999. Indirect interactions between two aphid species in relation to ant attendance Ecol. Res. 14 : 329.
74. Stachowicz, J. J. 2001. Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities Bioscience 51 : 235 246.
75. Stadler, B. Dixon, A. F. G. 2005. Ecology and evolution of aphid- ant interactions Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 36 : 345 372.
76. Stinchcombe, J. 2002. Can tolerance traits impose selection on herbivores? Evol. Ecol. 16 : 595 602.
77. Stowe, K. A. et al. 2000. The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31 : 565 595.
78. Strauss, S. Y. Agrawal, A. A. 1999. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 : 179 185.
79. Strauss, S. Y. et al. 2002. Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 : 278 285.
80. Suzuki, N. Ide, T. 2008. The foraging behaviours of larvae of the ladybird beetle, Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) towards ant-tended and non-ant-tended aphids Ecol. Res. 23 : 371 378.
81. Takeda, S. et al. 1982. Effects of ant-attendance on the honeydew excretion and larviposition of the cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Appl. Entomol. Zool. 17 : 133 135.
82. Thompson, J. N. 1982. Interaction and coevolution. Wiley.
83. Thompson, J. N. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. Univ. of Chicago Press.
84. Tiffin, P. 2000. Are tolerance, avoidance and antibiosis evolutionarily and ecologically equivalent responses of plants to herbivores? Am. Nat. 155 : 128 138.
85. Tokunaga, E. Suzuki, N. 2008. Colony growth and dispersal in the ant-tended aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch, and the non-ant-tended aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, under the absence of predators and ants Popul. Ecol. 50 : 45 52.
86. Trivers, R. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism Q. Rev. Biol. 46 : 35 57.
87. van Baalen, M. Jansen, V. A. A. 2001. Dangerous liaisons: the ecology of private interest and common good Oikos 95 : 211 224.
88. Way, M. J. 1963. Mutualism between ants and honeydew producing Homoptera Annu. Rev. Entomol. 8 : 307 343.
89. Weiblen, G. D. 2002. How to be a fig wasp Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47 : 299 330.
90. Westerbergh, A. 2004. An interaction between a specialized seed predator moth and its dioecious host plant shifting from parasitism to mutualism Oikos 105 : 564 574.
91. Yao, I. Akimoto, S. 2001. Ant attendance changes the sugar composition of the honeydew of the drepanosiphid aphid Tuberculatus quercicola Oecologia 128 : 36 43.
92. Yao, I. Akimoto, S. 2002. Flexibility in the composition and concentration of amino acids in honeydew of the drepanosiphid aphid Tuberculatus quercicola Ecol. Entomol. 27 : 745 752.
93. Yao, I. et al. 2000. Costs and benefits of ant attendance to the drepanosiphid aphid Tuberculatus quercicola Oikos 89 : 3 10.
94. Yu, D. Pierce, N. E. 1998. A castration parasite of an ant-plant mutualism Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265 : 375 382.