A continuous adjoint formulation for the computation of topological and surface sensitivities of ducted flows

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 861-877

  Othmer, C ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adjoint methods; Ducted flows; Finite volume solver; Sensitivities; Shape optimization; Topology optimization

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COST FUNCTIONS; FLUID DYNAMICS; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TOPOLOGY;

ADJOINT METHODS; DUCTED FLOWS; FINITE VOLUME SOLVER; SENSITIVITIES; TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION;

SHAPE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 61749098877     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1770     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Jameson A. Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using the Adjoint Method. VKI Lecture Series, vol. 2. Von Karman Institute: Rhode St Gen'ese, Belgium, 2003.
2. Giles MB, Pierce NA. An introduction to the adjoint approach to design. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 2000; 65:393.
3. Mohammadi B, Pironneau O. Applied Shape Optimization for Fluids. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2001.
4. Löhner R, Soto O, Yang C. An adjoint-based design methodology for CFD optimization problems. AIAA-03-0299, 2003.
5. Soto O, Löhner R. On the computation of flow sensitivities from boundary integrals. AIAA-04-0112, 2004.
6. Choi KK, Kim NH. Structural Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization, vols. 1 and 2. Springer: Berlin, 2005.
7. Borrvall T, Petersson J. Topology optimization of fluids in Stokes flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2003; 41:77.
8. Sigmund O, Gersborg-Hansen A, Haber RB. Topology optimization for multi-physics problems: a future FEMLAB application? In Proceedings of the Nordic MATLAB Conference 2003, Gregersen L (ed.). Comsol A/S: Søborg, Denmark, 2003; 237.
9. Olesen LH, Okkels F, Bruus H. Topology optimization of Navier-Stokes flow in microfluidics. ECCOMAS 2004, Jyväskylä, 2004.
10. Gersborg-Hansen A, Sigmund O, Haber RB. Topology optimization of channel flow problems. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2005; 30(3):181.
11. Guest JK, Prévost JH. Topology optimization of creeping flows using a Darcy-Stokes finite element. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2006; 66(3):461.
12. Olesen LH, Okkels F, Bruus H. A high-level programming-language implementation of topology optimization applied to steady-state Navier-Stokes flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2006; 65:975.
13. Srinath DN, Mittal S. A stabilized finite element method for shape optimization in low Reynolds number flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007; 54(12):1451-1472.
14. Kaminski T, Giering R, Othmer C. Topological design based on highly efficient adjoints generated by automatic differentiation. ERCOFTAC Design Optimization Conference, Las Palmas, 2006.
15. Othmer C, Kaminski T, Giering R. Computation of topological sensitivities in fluid dynamics: cost function versatility. ECCOMAS CFD 2006, Delft, 2006.
16. Nadarajah S, Jameson A. A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automatic aerodynamic optimization. AIAA CP-00-0667, 2000.
17. Cusdin P, Müller JD. On the performance of discrete adjoint CFD codes using automatic differentiation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2005; 47(6-7):939-945.
18. Griewank A. Evaluating Derivatives: Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation. SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 2000.
19. OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox. http://www.opencfd.co.uk/openfoam/ index.html (2 August 2007).
20. Othmer C, de Villiers E, Weller HG. Implementation of a continuous adjoint for topology optimization of ducted flows. AIAA-2007-3947, 2007.
21. Dwight RP, Brezillon J. Effect of various approximations of the discrete adjoint on gradient-based optimization. AIAA-2006-0690, 2006.
22. Svanberg K. The method of moving asymptotesùa new method for structural optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1987; 24:359.
23. Pironneau O. Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems. Springer: Berlin, 1984.
24. Mohammadi B, Bharadwaj R, Molho JI, Santiago JG. Incomplete sensitivities in design and control of fluidic channels. Annual Research Briefs 2001, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, 2001.
25. Othmer C, Grahs T. Approaches to fluid dynamic optimization in the car development process. EUROGEN 2005, Munich, 2005.
26. Samareh JA. A survey of shape parameterization techniques for high-fidelity multidisciplinary shape optimization. AIAA Journal 2001; 39(5):877.
27. Soto O, Löhner R, Yang C. A stabilized pseudo-shell approach for surface parametrization in CFD design problems. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 2002; 18(4):251.
28. Ronzheimer A. Shape parametrization in multidisciplinary design optimization based on freeform deformation. EUROGEN 2005, Munich, 2005.
29. Armstrong CG, Robinson TT, Ou H, Othmer C. Linking adjoint sensitivity maps with CAD parameters. EUROGEN 2007, Jyväskylä, 2007.