3D float tracking: In situ floodplain roughness estimation

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 201-212

  Straatsma, Menno ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ADCP; Hydrodynamic friction; In situ measurements; Instrumentation; Robotic total station; Submerged vegetation

Indexed keywords

BANKS (BODIES OF WATER); DOPPLER EFFECT; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOW VELOCITY; FLUID DYNAMICS; FRICTION; HYDRODYNAMICS; INSTRUMENTS; MEASUREMENTS; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER LEVELS; WINDOWS;

ADCP; HYDRODYNAMIC FRICTION; IN SITU MEASUREMENTS; INSTRUMENTATION; ROBOTIC TOTAL STATION; SUBMERGED VEGETATION;

VEGETATION;

ACOUSTIC DOPPLER CURRENT PROFILER; BED ROUGHNESS; ESTIMATION METHOD; FLOODPLAIN; FLOW VELOCITY; HYDRODYNAMICS; IN SITU MEASUREMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; PEAK DISCHARGE; RIVER BED; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHALLOW-WATER EQUATION; TRACKING; WATER DEPTH;

EID: 61749091642     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7147     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Armanini A, Righetti M, Grisenti P. 2005. Direct measurements of vegetation resistance in prototype scale. Journal of Hydraulic Research 43: 481-487.
2. Baptist MJ, Penning WE, Duel H, Smits AJM, Geerling GW, Van der Lee GEM, Van Alphen JSL. 2004. Assessment of the effects of cyclic floodplain rejuvenation on flood levels and biodiversity along the Rhine River. River Research and Applications 20: 285-297.
3. Baptist MJ, Babovich V, Rodríguez Uthurburu J, Keijzer M, Uittenbogaard RE, Mynett A, Verwey A. 2007. On inducing equations for vegetation resistance. Journal of Hydraulic Research 45: 435-450.
4. Biron PM, Richer A, Kirkbride AD, Roy AG, Han S. 2002. Spatial patterns of water surface topography at a river confluence. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27: 913-928.
5. Carollo FG, Ferro V, Termini D. 2002. Flow velocity measurements in vegetated channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 128: 664-673.
6. Choi SU, Kang H. 2006. Numerical investigations of mean flow and turbulence structures of partly-vegetated open-channel flows using the Reynolds stress model. Journal of Hydraulic Research 44: 203-217.
7. Dietrich WE, Smith JD. 1983. Influence of the point bar on flow through curved channels. Water Resources Research 19: 1173-1192.
8. Freeman GE, Derrick DR, Rahmeyer WJ. 1996. Vegetative roughness in flood control channels. In Proceedings of the North American Water and Environment Congress. American Society of Engineers: Anaheim, CA.
9. Horritt MS, Bates PD. 2002. Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. Journal of Hydrology 268: 87-99.
10. Jansen BJM, Backx JJGM. 1998. Ecotope mapping Rhine Branches-east 1997 (in Dutch). 98.054, RIZA, Lelystad.
11. Järvelä J. 2002. Flow resistance of flexible and stiff vegetation: a flume study with natural plants. Journal of Hydrology 269: 44-54.
12. Järvelä J. 2004. Effect of submerged flexible vegetation on flow structure and resistance. Journal of Hydrology 307: 233-241.
13. Keulegan GH. 1938. Laws of turbulent flow in open channels. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards 21: (research paper 1151): 707-741.
14. Klaassen GJ, Van der Zwaard JJ. 1974. Roughness coefficients of vegetated flood plains. Journal of Hydraulic Research 12: 43-63.
15. Kouwen N, Fathi-Moghadam M. 2000. Friction factors for coniferous trees along rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 126: 732-740.
16. Kouwen N, Li RM. 1980. Biomechanics of vegetated channel linings. Journal of Hydraulics Divisions 106: 1085-1103.
17. Marine-electronics. 2006. Multi-return altimeter. http://www.marine-electronics.co.uk/brochures/altimeter/11 001.pdf, date accessed 20-7-2006.
18. Muste M, Yu K, Pratt T, Abraham D. 2004. Practical aspects of ADCP data use for quantification of mean river flow characteristics; Part II: fixed-vessel measurements. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 15: 17-28.
19. Nienhuis PH, Leuven RSEW. 2001. River restoration and flood protection: controversy or synergism? Hydrobiologia 444: 85-99.
20. Proust S, Rivière N, Bousmar D, Pauier A, Zech Y, Morel R. 2006. Flow in compound channel with abrupt floodplain contraction. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 132: 958-970.
21. Rameshwaran P, Shiono K. 2007. Quasi two-dimensional model for straight overbank flows through emergent vegetation on floodplains. Journal of Hydraulic Research 45: 302-315.
22. RDInstruments. 1996. Acoustic doppler current profiler, principles of operation, a practical primer. RDInstruments: San Diego, California.
23. Silva W. 2003. How much water may enter our country at Lobith, now and in the future? (in Dutch). 2003.015, RIZA, Arnhem.
24. Trimble 2006. Datasheet Trimble 5600 DR total station. http://trl.trimble.com/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-8889/ 12412E_5600_DS_0306_lr.pdf, date accessed 12-7-2006.
25. Tsujimoto T. 1999. Fluvial processes in streams with vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 37: 789-803.
26. Van Rijn LC. 1994. Principles of Fluid Flow and Surface Waves in Rivers, Estuaries, Seas and Oceans. Aqua publications: Amsterdam.
27. Van Stokkom HTC, Smits AJM, Leuven RSEW. 2005. Flood defense in the Netherlands: a new era, a new approach. Water International 30: 76-87.
28. Van Urk A. 1981. Hydraulische ruwheid grasland in uiterwaarden (in Dutch). WWZO 81.21, RIZA, Arnhem.
29. Wilson CAME. 2007. Flow resistance models for flexible submerged vegetation. Journal of Hydrology 342: 213-222.
30. Wilson CAME, Yagci O, Rauch HP, Olsen NRB. 2006. 3D numerical modelling of a willow vegetated river/floodplain system. Journal of Hydrology 327: 13-21.
31. Yang K, Cao S, Knight DW. 2007. Flow patterns in compound channels with vegetated floodplains. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 133: 148-159.