Perioperative complications in revision anterior lumbar spine surgery: Incidence and risk factors

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 87-90

  Schwender, James D ^a   Casnellie, Michael T ^a   Perra, Joseph H ^a   Transfeldt, Ensor E ^a   Pinto, Manuel R ^a   Denis, Francis ^a   Garvey, Timothy A ^a   Polly, David W ^a   Mehbod, Amir A ^a   Dykes, Daryll C ^a   Winter, Robert B ^a   Wroblewski, Jill M ^a  

^a TWIN CITIES SPINE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Complications; Retrograde ejaculation; Revision anterior fusion surgery; Ureteral injury; Vein laceration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY INJURY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SALVAGE THERAPY; SPINE FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR; VEIN INJURY; INCIDENCE; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 61749085573     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181918ad0     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Escobar E, Transfeldt E, Garvey T, et al. Video-assisted versus open anterior lumbar spine fusion surgery: a comparison of four techniques and complications in 135 patients. Spine 2003;28:729-32.
2. Faciszewski T, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, et al. The surgical and medical periop-erative complications of anterior spinal fusion surgery in the thoracic and lumbar spine in adults: a review of 1223 procedures. Spine 1995;20:1592-9.
3. David T. Revision of a CHARITE artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charite artificial disc: case report and explant analysis. Eur Spine J 2005;14: 507-11.
4. Gumbs AA, Hanan S, Yue JJ, et al. Revision open anterior approaches for spine procedures. Spine J 2007;7:280-5.
5. Leary SP, Regan JJ, Lanman TH, et al. Revision and explantation strategies involving the CHARITE lumbar artificial disc replacement. Spine 2007;32: 1001-11.
6. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Lee GA, et al. Revision strategies for salvaging or improving failed cylindrical cages. Spine 1999;24:2147-53.
7. Nguyen HV, Akbarnia BA, van Dam BE, et al. Anterior exposure of the spine for removal of lumbar interbody devices and implants. Spine 2006; 31:2449-53.
8. Wagner WH, Regan JJ, Leary SP, et al. Access strategies for revision or explantation of the CHARITE lumbar artificial disc replacement. J Vasc Surg 2006;44:1266-72.
9. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, et al. SB CHARITE disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:424-33.
10. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, et al. Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:362-8.
11. Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, et al. Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:352-61.
12. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M, et al. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 1999;8:210-17.
13. Kulkarni SS, Lowery GL, Ross RE, et al. Arterial complications following anterior lumbar interbody fusion: report of eight cases. Eur Spine J 2003;12: 48-54; discussion 55-46.
14. Guingrich JA, McDermott JC. Ureteral injury during laparoscopy-assisted anterior lumbar fusion. Spine 2000;25:1586-8.
15. Isiklar ZU, Lindsey RW, Coburn M. Ureteral injury after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a case report. Spine 1996;21:2379-82.
16. Sasso RC, Kenneth Burkus J, et al. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure. Spine 2003;28:1023-26.
17. Birch N, Shaw M. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2004;29:106-107.