Marijuana initiation among American youth and its risks as dynamic processes: Prospective findings from a national longitudinal study

Substance Use and Misuse

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 195-211

  Tang, Zhiqun ^a   Orwin, Robert G ^a  

^a WESTAT   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent; Cohort sequential design; Complex longitudinal survey data; Dynamic process; Incidence; Marijuana initiation; Multiple imputation; Parental influence; Peer influence; Risk and protective factors

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; CANNABIS;

ADOLESCENCE; ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO CHANGE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CANNABIS ADDICTION; CHILD; CHILDHOOD; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; JUVENILE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PARENT; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; PEER GROUP; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCHOOL CHILD; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MARIJUANA SMOKING; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS; PEER GROUP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 61649117040     PISSN: 10826084     EISSN: 15322491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10826080802347636     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson, E. R. (1995). Accelerating and maximizing information from short-term longitudinal research. In J.M.Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change (pp. 139-164). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
2. Bailey, S. L., Hubbard, R. L. (1990). Developmental variation in the context of marijuana initiation among adolescents. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 31:58-70.
3. Barnard, J., Rubin, D. B. (1999). Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation. Biometrika 86:948-955.
4. Bray, J. W., Zarkin, G. A., Ringwalt, C., Qi, J. (2000). The relationship between marijuana initiation and dropping out of high school. Health Economics 9:9-18.
5. Bronfenbrenner, U., Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 993-1028). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6. Brook, J. S., Kessler, R. C., Cohen, P. (1999). The onset of marijuana use from preadolescence and early adolescence to young adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 11:901-914.
7. Chilcoat, H. D., Anthony, J. C. (1996). Impact of parent monitoring on initiation of drug use through late childhood. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35:91-100.
8. Dick, D. M., Pagan, J. L., Viken, R., Purcell, S., Kaprio, J., Pulkkinen, L. et al. (2007). Changing environmental influences on substance use across development. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10:315-326.
9. Duncan, S. C., Duncan, T. E., Strycker, L. A. (2006). Alcohol use from ages 9 to 16: A cohort-sequential latent growth model. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 81:71-81.
10. Ellickson, P. L., Tucker, J. S., Klein, D. J., Saner, H. (2004). Antecedents and outcomes of marijuana use initiation during adolescence. Preventive Medicine, 39:976-984.
11. Gfroerer, J. C., Wu, L. T., Penne, M. A. (2002). Initiation of marijuana use: Trends, patterns, and implications. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies.
12. Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8:206-213.
13. Hyatt, S. L., Collins, L. M. (2000). Using Latent transition analysis to examine the relationship between parental permissiveness and the onset of substance use. In J. Rose, L. Chassin, C. Presson, & S. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research (pp. 259-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., Schulenberg, J. E. (2005). Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2004. (National Institutes of Health Publication No. 05-5726). Bethesda, MD: The National Institute on Drug Abuse.
15. Kandel, D. B. (2002). Stages and pathways of drug involvement: Examining the gateway hypothesis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16. Kandel, D. B. (1996). The parental and peer contexts of adolescent deviance: An algebra of interpersonal influences. Journal of Drug Issues 26:289-315.
17. Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Guo, J., Catalano, R. F., Abbott, R. D. (2000). The dynamics of alcohol and marijuana initiation: Patterns and predictors of first use in adolescence. American Journal of Public Health 90:360-366.
18. Orwin, R., Cadell, C., Chu, A., Kalton, G., Maklan, D., Morin, C. et al. (2006). Evaluation of the national youth anti-drug media campaign. Report prepared for the National Institute on Drug Abuse (Contract No. N01DA-8-5063). Washington DC: Westat.
19. Petraitis, J., Flay, B. R., Miller, T. Q. (1995). Reviewing theories of adolescent substance use: Organizing pieces in the puzzle. Psychological Bulletin, 117:67-86.
20. Raghunathan, T. E., Solenberger, P. W., van Hoewyk, J. (2002). IVEware: Imputation and Variance Estimation Software User Guide. (Accessed on November 5, 2006; Available at http://www.isr.umich.edu/src/smp/ive/)
21. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.
22. Thornberry, T. P. (1996). Empirical support for interactional theory: A review of the literature. In J.D.Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and Crime (pp. 198-235). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23. Thornberry, T. P. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology 25: 863-891.
24. van den Bree, M. B., Pickworth, W. B. (2005). Risk factors predicting changes in marijuana involvement in teenagers. Archives of General Psychiatry 62:311-319.
25. Westat (2006). User's guide for the evaluation of the national youth anti-drug media campaign. Prepared for the NIDA (Contract No. N01DA-8-5063). Washington DC.