What's wrong with benchmarks? Answering the wrong questions with the wrong answers

Curriculum Perspectives

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1-10

  Woods, Annette ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61649114646     PISSN: 01597868     EISSN: 23671793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Afflerbach, P. (2002). The road to folly and redemption: Perspectives on the legitimacy of high-stakes testing. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(3), pp. 348-60.
2. Alloway, N. & Gilbert, P. (1998). Reading literacy test data. Benchmarking success? The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 21(3), pp. 249-61.
3. Brock, P. (1998). The great literacy debate - again. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 21(1), pp. 8-26.
4. Christie, F. (1998). Point and counterpoint: Benchmarking. Curriculum Perspectives, 18(3), pp. 43-45.
5. Commonwealth Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. (1997). National literacy and numeracy benchmarks. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
6. Department of Employment, Education and Training. (1991). The Australian language and literacy policy. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Printing Service.
7. Education Queensland. (2001). School reform longitudinal study: Final report. Brisbane, Australia: School of Education, University of Queensland.
8. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A.M. Sheridan Smith, trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
9. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, trans.). London, UK: Penguin.
10. Foucault, M. (1983). Discourse and truth: The problematization of parrhesia, Six lectures given by Michel Foucault at the University of California at Berkeley, October-November 1983. Retrieved 7 May 2004 from http://foucault.info/ documents/parrhesia/
11. Gee, J. (1999). Reading and the New Literacy Studies: Reframing the National Academy of Sciences report on reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 31(3), pp. 355-74.
12. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Training. (1993). The literacy challenge. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Printing Service.
13. Jones, C. (1998, 24 April). Deal clinched on literacy benchmark. The Age, p. 3.
14. Kemp, D. (1999). Outcomes reporting and accountable schooling. Paper presented at the Curriculum Corporation 6th National Conference, 6-7 May, 1999.
15. Leung, C. (1998). Benchmarking literacy attainment: A case of curriculum displacement? Curriculum Perspectives, 18(3), pp. 50-55.
16. Luke, A. & van Kraayenoord, C. (1998). Babies, bathwaters and benchmarks: Literacy assessment and curriculum reform. Curriculum Perspectives, 18(3), pp. 55-62.
17. Luke, A., Woods, A., Land, R., Bahr, M. & McFarland, M. (2002). Accountability: Inclusive assessment, monitoring and reporting. Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: Queensland Indigenous Education Consultative Body.
18. Macnamara, L. (2005, 30 September). Educators concede a role for the old ways. The Australian, p. 2.
19. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (1999a, 29 July). The Adelaide declaration on national goals for schooling for the twenty-first century. Retrieved 18 July 2002, from http://www.curriculum. edu.au/mceetya/nationalgoals/index.htm
20. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (1999b). The national literacy and numeracy plan. Canberra, Australia: Author.
21. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (1999c). National report on schooling in Australia. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
22. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2000). National report on schooling in Australia preliminary paper. National benchmark results reading and numeracy Years 3 and 5. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
23. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2001). National report on schooling in Australia preliminary paper. National benchmark results reading and numeracy Years 3 and 5. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
24. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2002). National report on schooling in Australia preliminary paper. National benchmark results reading and numeracy Years 3 and 5. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
25. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2003). National report on schooling in Australia 2003. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
26. Nelson, B. (2001). Quality teaching a national priority. Media release: 4 April 2002 min 42/02.
27. Quality of Education Review Committee chaired by Peter Karmel. (1985). Quality of education review. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Government Printing Service.
28. Rindfleisch, T. (2001, 29 July). Kemp: Vic tests fail. Sunday Herald Sun, p. 36.
29. The Editor. (2005, 30 September). Educated Consumers. The Australian, p. 15.
30. Willis, S. (1998). First do no harm: Accountability and the numeracy benchmarks. Curriculum Perspectives, 18(3), pp. 70-76.
31. Woods, A. (in preparation) Queensland Statewide Tests in Aspects of Literacy and Numeracy: Forming the Literate Student through Testing.