Analysis of extractive distillation with mathematical programming

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 47, Issue 24, 2008, Pages 9983-9995

  Emhamed, Abdulfatah M ^a   Czuczai, Barbara ^a   Rev, Endre ^a   Lelkes, Zoltán ^a  

^a BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISTILLATION PROCESS; ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTS; ECONOMICAL ASPECTS; EXTRACTIVE DISTILLATIONS; MINLP MODELS; OPTIMAL CONFIGURATIONS; OPTIMAL STRUCTURES; OPTIMIZATION TOOLS;

DISTILLATION; HEAVY WATER; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; METHANOL;

ORGANIC SOLVENTS;

EID: 61649107162     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie071556z     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Low, K. H.; Sorensen, E. Optimal Operation of Extractive Distillation in Different Batch Configurations. AIChE J. 2002, 48, 1034.
2. Laroche, L.; Bekiaris, N.; ersen, H. W.; Morari, M. Homogeneous Azeotropic Distillation: Separability and Flowsheet Synthesis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1992, 31, 2190.
3. Gentry, J.; Kumar, S.; Wright-Wytcherley, R. Extractive Distillation Applied. Prepared for presentation at the 2003AIChE Spring Meeting.
4. Van Winkle, M. Distillation; Chemical Engineering Series; McGraw-Hill Inc: New York, 1967.
5. Doherty, M. F.; Caldarola, G. A. Design and Synthesis of Homogeneous Azeotropic Distillation. 3. The sequencing of Columns for Azeotropic and Extractive Distillations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1985, 24, 474.
6. Langston, P.; Hilal, N.; Shingfield, S.; Webb, S. Simulation and Optimization of Extractive Distillation with Water as Solvent. Chem. Eng. Proc. 2005, 44, 345.
7. Munoz, R.; Monton, J. B.; Burguet, M. C.; de la Torre, .1. Separation of Isobutyl Alcohol and Isobutyl Acetate by Extractive Distillation and Pressure-Swing Distillation: Simulation and Optimization. Sev. Purif. Technol. 2006, 50, 175.
8. Hilal, N.; Yousef, G.; Langston. P. The Reduction of Extractive Agent in Extractive Distillation and Auto-Extractive Distillation. Chem. Eng. Proc. 2001, 41, 673.
9. Yeomans, H.; Grossmann, I. E. A Systematic Modeling Framework of Superstructure Optimization in Process Synthesis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1999, 23, 709.
10. Viswanathan, J.; Grossmann, 1. E. An Alternate MINLP Model for Finding the Number of Trays Required for a Specific Separation Objective. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1993, 17, 949.
11. Farkas, T.; Czuczai, B.; Rev, E.; Lelkes, Z. New MINLP Model and Modified Outer Approximation Algorithm for Distillation Column Synthesis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 3088.
12. Hunek, J.; Gal, S.; Posel, F.; Glavic, P. Separation of an Azeotropic Mixture by Reverse Extractive Distillation. AIChE J. 1989, 35, 1207.
13. Bisschop, J.; Roelofs, M. AIMMS. The Language Reference; Paragon Decision Technology: The Netherlands, 2007.
14. Knapp, J. P.; Doherty, M. F. Minimum Entrainer Flows for Extractive Distillation: a Bifurcation Theoretic Approach. AIChE J. 1994, 40, 243.
15. Chadda, N.; Malone, M. F.; Doherty, M. F. Feasible Products for Kinetically Controlled Reactive Distillation of Ternary Mixtures. AIChE J. 2000, 46, 923.
16. Luyben, M. L.; Floudas, C. A. Analyzing the Interaction of Design and Control-1. A Multiobjective Framework and Application to Binary Distillation Synthesis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18, 933.
17. Box, G. E. P.; Hunter, J. S.; Hunter, W. G. Statistics for Experimenters- Design, Innovation, and Discovery; Wiley: Hoboken, 2005.
18. Kister H. Z. Distillation Design; McGraw-Hill, Inc.: New York, 1992.