Stochastic analysis of stepwise fluorescence quenching reactions on single-walled carbon nanotubes: Single molecule sensors

Nano Letters

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 4299-4304

  Jin, Hong ^a   Heller, Daniel A ^a   Kim, Jong Ho ^a   Strano, Michael S ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANTS; CELL SCAFFOLDS; COLLAGEN FILMS; CONCENTRATION OF; DWELL TIME; ELECTRON TRANSFERS; FLUORESCENCE QUENCHING; HIDDEN MARKOV MODELING; LIVING CELLS; MOLECULAR ADSORPTIONS; NANOTUBE SURFACES; PHOTOGENERATED EXCITONS; QUENCHING RATE CONSTANTS; REACTANT MOLECULES; REDOX POTENTIALS; SINGLE MOLECULES; STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS;

ADSORPTION; BIOSENSORS; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANTS; MOLECULES; QUENCHING; RANDOM PROCESSES; RATE CONSTANTS; SINGLE-WALLED CARBON NANOTUBES (SWCN); THREE DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

CARBON NANOTUBES;

EID: 61649104196     PISSN: 15306984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/nl802010z     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barone, P. W.; Baik, S.; Heller, D. A.; Strano, M. S. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 86-96.
2. Heller, D. A.; Jeng, E. S.; Yeung, T. K.; Martinez, B. M.; Moll, A. E.; Gastala, J. B.; Strano, M. S. Science 2006, 311, 508-511.
3. Jin, H.; Jeng, E. S.; Heller, D. A.; Jena, P. V.; Kirmse, R.; Langowski, J.; Strano, M. S. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 6731-6739.
4. Barone, P. W.; Strano, M. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8138-8141.
5. Cherukuri, P.; Bachilo, S. M.; Litovsky, S. H.; Weisman, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15638-15639.
6. Welsher, K.; Liu, Z.; Daranciang, D.; Dai, H. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 586-590.
7. Heller, D. A.; Baik, S.; Eurell, T. E.; Strano, M. S. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 2793-2799.
8. Jin, H.; Heller, D. A.; Strano, M. S. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 1577-1585.
9. O'Connell, M. J.; Eibergen, E. E.; Doorn, S. K. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 412-418.
10. Saito, R.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S. Physical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes; Imperial College Press: London, 1998.
11. Choi, J. H.; Strano, M. S. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 223114-223113.
12. Brege, J. J.; Gallaway, C.; Barron, A. R. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 17812-17820.
13. Cognet, L.; Tsyboulski, D. A.; Rocha, J. D. R.; Doyle, C. D.; Tour, J. M.; Weisman, R. B. Science 2007, 316, 1465-1468.
14. Barone, P. W.; Parker, R. S.; Strano, M. S. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 7556-7562.
15. Kleinman, H. K.; Klebe, R. J.; Martin, G. R. J. Cell Biol. 1981, 88, 473-485.
16. Merzak, A.; Koochekpour, S.; Pilkington, G. J. Cell Adhes. Commun. 1995, 3, 27-43.
17. McKinney, S. A.; Joo, C.; Ha, T. Biophys. J. 2006, 91, 1941-1951.
18. Joo, C.; McKinney, S. A.; Nakamura, M.; Rasnik, I.; Myong, S.; Ha, T. Cell 2006, 126, 515-527.
19. Song, C. H.; Pehrsson, P. E.; Zhao, W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 21634-21639.
20. Bachilo, S. M.; Strano, M. S.; Kittrell, C.; Hauge, R. H.; Smalley, R. E.; Weisman, R. B. Science 2002, 298, 2361-2366.
21. Linsenmayer, T. F. In Collagen, in Cell Biology of Extracellular Matrix; Hay, E. D., Ed.; Plenum Press: NY, 1991, pp 5-37.
22. Wang, X. D.; Bank, R. A.; TeKoppele, J. M.; Agrawal, C. M. J. Orthop. Res. 2001, 19, 1021-1026.
23. Pari, L.; Venkateswaran, S. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2003, 36, 861-870.
24. Choi, J. H.; Chen, K. H.; Strano, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15584-15585.
25. Landes, C.; Braun, M.; Burda, C.; El-Sayed, M. A. Nano Lett. 2001, 1, 667-670.
26. Landes, C.; Burda, C.; Braun, M.; El-Sayed, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 2981-2986.
27. Cowdery-Corvan, J. R.; Whitten, D. G.; McLendon, G. L. Chem. Phys. 1993, 176, 377-386.
28. Menter, J. M. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2006, 5, 403-410.
29. Eddy, S. R. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 1315-1316.
30. Messina, T. C.; Kim, H. Y.; Giurleo, J. T.; Talaga, D. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 16366-16376.
31. Talaga, D. S. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 12, 285-296.
32. Yang, H.; Luo, G. B.; Karnchanaphanurach, P.; Louie, T. M.; Rech, I.; Cova, S.; Xun, L. Y.; Xie, X. S. Science 2003, 302, 262-266.
33. Andree, M.; Levy, R. M.; Talaga, D. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 7454-7464.
34. Schroder, G. F.; Grubmuller, H. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 9920-9924.
35. (a) There are two mathematical approaches in describing one chemical reaction: the deterministic approach, which considers the reaction as a continuous and predictable process governed by a set of coupled ordinary differential equations, and the stochastic approach, which considers the reaction as a random-walk process governed by a single differential equation. Gillespie, D. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 2340-2361.
36. (b) In the stochastic approach, a reaction can be numerically simulated using the Monte Carlo procedure without approximating infinitesimal time increments by finite time steps. Because of this, the stochastic approach has a firmer physical basis than the deterministic approach. From a practical numerical point, the stochastic rate constant and the deterministic rate constant differ by only two simple constant factors. Gillespie, D. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 2340-2361.
37. (c) We use the stochastic approach, and thus, the rate constants are stochastic rate constants in this work.
38. Gillespie, D. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 2340-2361.
39. Xia, L.; McCreery, R. L. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1999, 146, 3696-3701.
40. Latimer, W. M. Oxidation Potentials; Prentice-Hall: New York, 1938.