Systematic review of digital imaging screening strategies for retinopathy of prematurity

Pediatrics

Volumn 123, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Fielder, Alistair R ^a   Hildebrand, P Lloyd ^b   Ells, Anna ^c   Lorenz, Birgit ^d   Trese, Michael T ^e   Capone, Antonio ^e   Gordon, Robert A ^f   Wilson, Clare ^a   Fleck, Brian W ^g   Chiang, Michael F ^h  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Calgary Retina Consultants   (Canada)

^d JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY GIESSEN   (Germany)

^e Retinal Consultants   (United States)

^f TULANE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^g ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (United Kingdom)

^h New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD CARE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL IMAGING; EYE EXAMINATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROLENTAL FIBROPLASIA; SCREENING; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; NOTE; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; NEONATAL SCREENING; RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 61549138740     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 10984275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-3579     Document Type: Letter

References (15)

1. Kemper AR, Wallace DK, Quinn GE. Systematic review of digital imaging screening strategies for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics. 2008;122(4):825-830
2. Wilkinson AR, Haines L, Head K, Fielder AR. UK retinopathy of prematurity guideline. Early Hum Dev. 2008;84(2):71-74
3. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, Royal College of Ophthalmologists, British Association of Perinatal Medicine, BLISS. The guideline for the screening and treatment of reti- nopathy of prematurity (2008). Available at: www.rcpch.ac. uk/Research/CE/RCPCH-guidelines/ROP. Accessed December 16, 2008
4. Altman DG, Bland JM. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ. 1995;311(7003):485
5. Reynolds JD. Malpractice and the quality of care in retinopathy of prematurity (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;105:461-480
6. Reynolds JD, Dobson V, Quinn GE, et al. Evidence-based screening criteria for retinopathy of prematurity: natural history data from the CRYO-ROP and LIGHT-ROP studies. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(11):1470-1476
7. International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(7): 991-999
8. Kleberg A, Warren I, Norman E, et al. Lower stress responses after Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program care during eye screening examinations for retinopathy of prematurity: a randomized study. Pediatrics. 2008;121(5). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/ full/121/5/e1267
9. Chiang MF, Wang L, Busuioc M, et al. Telemedical retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: accuracy, reliability, and image quality. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(11):1531-1538
10. Scott KE, Kim D, Wang L, et al. Telemedical retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: agreement between ophthalmoscopic and image-based examinations. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1222-1228.e3
11. Nakagawa TA, Skrinska R. Improved documentation of retinal hemorrhages using a wide-field digital ophthalmic camera in patients who experienced abusive head trauma. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155(10):1149-1152
12. De Silva DJ, Cocker KD, Lau G, et al. Optic disk size and optic disk-to-fovea distance in preterm and full-term infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(11):4683-4686
13. McLoone E, O'Keefe M, Donoghue V, et al. RetCam image analysis of optic disc morphology in premature infants and its relation to ischaemic brain injury. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(4):465-471
14. Wilson CM, Cocker KD, Moseley MJ, et al. Computerized analysis of retinal vessel width and tortuosity in premature infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(8):3577-3585
15. Shrier I, Boivin JF, Platt RW, et al. The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process? BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:19