Governing national parks in Finland: The illusion of public involvement

Local Environment

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 233-243

  Grönholm, Sam ^a  

^a ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Archipelago National Park; National park; Nature conservation; Participatory planning; Stakeholder participation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NATIONAL PARK; NATURE CONSERVATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 61549138035     PISSN: 13549839     EISSN: 14696711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13549830802692955     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Blann, K. and Light, S. S. (2000) The path of last resort: Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management (AEAM) ("nine heuristics of highly adaptive managers") [online]
2. Blumenthal, D. and Jannink, J. L. (2000) A classification of collaborative management methods [online]
3. Cuthbertson, I. D. (1983) Evaluating public participation: An approach for government practitioners. Public involvement and social impact assessment, pp. 101-109. Westview Press, Boulder
4. Finger-Stich, A. and Finger, M. (2003) State versus participation: natural resources management in Europe, Institute for Development Studies, Brighton
5. Gilligan, B. et al. (2005) Management effectiveness evaluation of Finland's protected areas, F.G. Lonnberg, Helsinki
6. Gray, B. (1989) Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
7. Gronholm, S. and Berghall, J. (2007) Cooperation between coastal protected areas and surrounding societies: From experiences to recommendations, Edita, Helsinki
8. Heinonen, M. (2007) State of the parks in Finland. Finnish protected areas and their management from 2000 to 2005, Edita, Helsinki
9. Kyllonen, S. et al. (2006) Conflict management as a means to the sustainable use of natural resources. Silva Fennica, 40:4, pp. 628-728.
10. Lee, K. N. (1999) Appraising adaptive management [online]
11. Loikkanen, T., Simojoki, T. and Wallenius, P. (1999) Participatory approach to natural resource management: A guide book, Metsahallitus, Vantaa
12. Margoluis, R. and Salafsky, N. (1998) Measures of success: Designing, managing, and monitoring conservation and development projects, Island Press, Washington, DC
13. McLain, R. J. and Lee, R. G. (1996) Adaptive management: Promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management, 20:4, pp. 437-448.
14. Metsahallitus (1999) The principles of protected area management in Finland. Guidelines on the aims, functions, and management of state-owned protected areas, Edita, Helsinki
15. Metsahallitus (2007) Archipelago National Park to be certified as a PAN park [online]
16. Metsahallitus (2008) Metsahallitus is a forerunner in multi-criteria planning and decision-making [online]
17. Murray, C. and Marmorek, D. R. (2004) Adaptive management: A spoonful of rigour helps the uncertainty go down [online]
18. Perttula, M. (2006) Suomen kansallispuistojarjestelman kehittyminen 1960-1990-luvuilla ja U.S. National Park Servicen vaikutukset puistojen hoitoon, Edita, Helsinki
19. Salafsky, N., Margoluis, R. and Redford, K. H. (2001) Adaptive management: A tool for conservation practitioners [online]
20. Salafsky, N. et al. (2002) Improving the practise of conservation: A conceptual framework and research agenda for conservation science. Conservation Biology, 16:6, pp. 1469-1479.
21. Shindler, B. and Aldred Cheek, K. (1999) Integrating citizens in adaptive management: A propositional analysis [online]
22. Shindler, B. and Neburka, N. (1997) Public participation in forest planning: Eight attributes of success. Journal of Forestry, 95:1, pp. 17-19.
23. Sipila, M. and Tyrvainen, L. (2005) Evaluation of collaborative urban forest planning in Helsinki, Finland. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 4:1, pp. 1-12.
24. Sit, V. and Taylor, B. (1998) Statistical methods for adaptive management studies [online], British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Research Branch, Victoria, British Columbia
25. Tyrvainen, L., Silvennoinen, H. and Kolehmainen, O. (2003) Ecological and aesthetic values in urban forest management. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 1:3, pp. 135-149.
26. Wallenius, P. (2001) Participation in strategic planning of public natural resources, Helsinki University
27. Walters, C. J. and Holling, C. S. (1990) Large-scale management and learning by doing. Ecology, 71:6, pp. 2060-2068.
28. Warren, M. E. (1999) Democratic theory and trust. Democracy and trust, pp. 310-345. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne
29. Webler, T. and Tuler, S. (2001) Public participation in watershed management planning: Views on process from people in the field. Human Ecology Review, 8:2, pp. 29-39.