|
|
Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 8-16
|
|
Comparison of three peripherally-inserted central catheters: pilot study.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CATHETERIZATION;
CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION;
CHILD;
CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
CROSS INFECTION;
ECONOMICS;
EQUIPMENT;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INCIDENCE;
INDWELLING CATHETER;
INFANT;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NURSING;
PHLEBITIS;
PILOT STUDY;
PRESCHOOL CHILD;
RISK FACTOR;
STANDARD;
THROMBOSIS;
TIME;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS;
CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL;
CATHETERS, INDWELLING;
CHILD;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
CROSS INFECTION;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INCIDENCE;
INFANT;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PHLEBITIS;
PILOT PROJECTS;
RISK FACTORS;
THROMBOSIS;
TIME FACTORS;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
|
EID: 61549130622
PISSN: 09660461
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.1.32071 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (35)
|
|
References (0)
|
