The impact of induced stress upon selective attention in multiple object tracking

Military Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 81-97

  Morelli, Frank ^a   Burton, Pamela A ^a  

^a U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61549118800     PISSN: 08995605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08995600802565769     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Brickner, M. S., & Lipshitz, R. (2004). Pilot study: System model of situation awareness: "Sensemaking" and decision making in command and control (Air Force Research Laboratory Tech. Rep. No. AFRL-HE-WP-TR-2004-0071). Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: U. S. Air Force Research Laboratory.
2. Callaway, E. (1959). The influence of amobarbital (amylobarbitone) and methamphetamine on the focus of attention. Journal of Mental Science, 105, 382-392.
3. Callaway, E., & Dembo, D. (1958). Narrowed attention: A psychological phenomenon that accompanies a certain physiological change. Archives on Neurology and Psychiatry, 79, 74-90.
4. Callaway, E., & Thompson, S. V. (1953). Sympathetic activity and perception. Psychosomatic Medicine, 15, 443-455.
5. Chatterton, R. T., Vogelsong, K. M., Lu, Y., Ellman, A. B., & Hudgens, G. A. (1996). Salivary amylase as a measure of endogenous adrenergic activity. Clinical Psychology, 16, 433-448.
6. Endsley, M. R. (1995). A taxonomy of situation awareness errors. In R. Fuller, N. Johnston, & N. Mc-Donald (Eds.), Human factors in aviation operations (pp. 287-292). Aldershot, England: Avebury Aviation, Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
7. Endsley, M. R. (2000). Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: A critical review. In M. R. Endsley & D. Garland (Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Fatkin, L. A., & Hudgens, G. A. (1994). Stress perceptions of soldiers participating in training at the Chemical Defense Training Facility: The mediating effects of motivation, experience, and confidence level (Army Research Laboratory Tech. Rep No. ARL-TR-365). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
9. Fatkin, L. A., King, J. M., & Hudgens, G. A. (1990). Evaluation of stress experienced by Yellowstone Army fire fighters (U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory Rep. No. HEL-TM-9-90). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
10. Fatkin, L.T. (2003, February 12-16). Identifying the delayed effects of terrorism. In Proceedings of the International Critical Incident Stress Foundation, 7th World Congress on Stress, Trauma, & Coping, (pp. 279-290). Baltimore, MD: International Critical Incident Stress Foundation.
11. Fatkin, L. T., Hudgens, G. A., Torre, J. P., Jr., King, J. M., & Chatterton, R. T., Jr. (1991). Psychological responses to competitive marksmanship. In J. P. Torre, Jr., S. Wansack, G. A. Hudgens, J. M. King, L. T. Fatkin, J. Mazurczak, et al. (Eds.), Effects of competition and mode of fire on physiological responses, psychological stress reactions, and shooting performance (No. HEL TM 11-91). Aberdeen Proving Ground, (pp. 75-109). MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
12. Grier, R. A., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., Matthews, G., Galinsky, T. L., Szalma, J. L., etal. (2003). The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention, not mindlessness. Human Factors, 45(3), 349-359.
13. Hancock, P. A., & Ganey, H. C. N. (2004). From the inverted-U to the extended-U: Theevolution of a psychological law. Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 7(1), 5-14.
14. Hancock, P. A., Ganey, H. C. N., MouLoua, M., Salas, E., Gilson, R., Greenwood-Ericksen, A., et al. (2001, October 8-12). A descriptive framework for the evaluation of stress effects on operator performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, (948-951). Minneapolis, MN: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
15. Hancock, P. A., Szalma, J. L., & Weaver, J. L. (2002). The distortion of perceptual space-time under stress (White paper). DoD Army Research Office (ARO), Research Triangle Park, NC: MURI Operator Performance Under Stress (OPUS).
16. Hancock, P. A., & Warm, J. S. (1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31(5), 519-537.
17. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic Press.
18. Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498-525.
19. Lang, P. J. (1980). Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: Computer applications. In J. B. Sidowski, J. H. Johnson, & T. A. Williams (Eds.), Technology in menial health care delivery systems, (pp. 119-137). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
20. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). International Affective Picture System: Technical manual and affective ratings. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
21. Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Lubin, B., & Zuckerman, M. (1999). Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist-Revised. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
23. Peterson, S. A., & Simon, T. J. (2000). Computational evidence for the subitizing phenomenon as an emergent property of the human cognitive architecture. Cognitive Science, 24(1), 93-122.
24. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition, 32, 65-97.
25. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition, 80(1/2), 127-158.
26. Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3(3), 179-197.
27. Rensink, R. A. (2004). Visual sensing without seeing. Psychological Science, 15(1), 27-32.
28. Ross, J. M., Szalma, J. L., Thropp, J., & Hancock, P. A. (2003, October). Performance, workload, and stress with temporal and spatial task demands. Paper presented at the Potomac Chapter of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society: Contemporary and Emerging Issues in Human Factors, Engineering and Military Psychology, Ft. Belvoir, VA.
29. Simons, D. J., & Ambinder, M. S. (2005). Change blindness: Theory and consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(1), 44-48.
30. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(7). 261-267.
31. Skosnik, P. D., Chatterton, R. T., Swisher, T., & Park, S. (2000). Modulation of attentional inhibition by norepinephrine and cortisol after psychological stress. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 36, 59-68.
32. Szalma, J. L. (2002, September 30-October 4). Individual differences in the stress and workload of sustained attention. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting. (pp. 1002-1006). Baltimore, MD: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
33. Szalma, J. L., & Hancock, P. A. (2002). On mental resources and performance under stress (White paper). DoD Army Research Office (ARO), Research Triangle Park, NC: MURI Operator Performance Under Stress (OPUS).
34. Tipper, S. P., & Driver, J. (1988). Negative priming between response modalities: Evidence for the central locus of inhibition. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 45-52.
35. Venables, P. H. (1964). Input dysfunction in schizophrenia. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (pp. 1-47). New York: Academic Press.
36. Waugh, J. D., Fatkin, L. T., Patton, D. J., Mullins, L. L., Burton, P. A., Barker, D. J., et al. (1999). Aviator behavior and performance as affected by aircrew life support and protective equipment (Army Research Laboratory Tech. Rep. No. ARL-MR-440). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory
37. Yantis, S. (1992). Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 295-340.
38. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459-482.