Revising doxography: Hermann diels and his critics

Philologus

Volumn 145, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 219-243

  Zhmud, Leonid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61449286399     PISSN: 00317985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1524/phil.2001.145.2.219     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. A. Capizzi, The cosmic republic, Amsterdam 1990.
2. P. Kingsley, Ancient philosophy, mystery, and magic: Empedocles and the Pythagorean tradition, Oxford 1995.
3. H. Cherniss, Aristotle's criticism of Presocratic philosophy, Baltimore 1935.
4. J. B. McDiarmid, Theophrastus on Presocratic causes, HSCPh 61 (1953), 85-156.
5. P. Steinmetz, Die Physik des Theophrastos von Eresos, Berlin 1964, 334-51.
6. J. Mansfeld, D. Runia, Aëtiana: The method and intellectual context of a doxographer, The sources, vol. 1, Leiden 1997, 333–38.
7. P. Kingsley, Empedocles and his interpreters: The four-element doxography, Phronesis 39 (1994), 235-54.
8. J. Mansfeld, Doxographi Graeci, in: W. M. Calder III, J. Mansfeld (eds.), Hermann Diels (1848-1922).
9. J. Bremmer, Aëtius, Arius Didymus and the transmission of doxography, Mnemosyne 51 (1998), 154-60.
10. H. Baltussen, Theophrastus on theories of perception: Argument and purpose in the De sensibus (Diss.), Utrecht 1993.
11. D. Runia, What is doxography?, in: R van der Eijk (ed.), Ancient histories of medicine, Leiden 1999, 38-39.
12. J. Mansfeld, Studies in the historiography of Greek philosophy, Assen 1990, 23.
13. J. Mansfeld, Heresiography in context. Hippolytus' Elenchos as a source for Greek philosophy, Leiden 1992.
14. H. Baltussen, Plato in the Placita (Aëtius Bk. IV): A Dielsian blind spot, Philologus 144 (2000), 227-38.
15. D. O'Brien, Hermann Diels on the Presocratics: Empedocles' double destruction of the cosmos (Aëtius II 4.8), Phronesis 45. 1 (2000), 16.
16. H. Diels, Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Hildesheim 1969, 101.
17. J. Mansfeld, Sources, in: A. A. Long (ed.), The Cambridge companion to early Greek philosophy, Cambridge 1999, 35.
18. M. Gigante, Frammenti di Ippoboto, in: Omaggio a Piero Treves, Padua 1984, 151-93.
19. D. Runia, Doxographie, DNP 3 (1997), 804-805.
20. W. von Kienle, Die Berichte über die Sukzessionen der Philosophen in der hellenistischen und spätantiken Literatur (Diss.), Berlin 1961, 79.
21. J. Mejer, Diogenes Laertius and his Hellenistic background, Wiesbaden 1978, 64.
22. B. Wyss, Doxographie, RLAC 4 (1959), 199.
23. D. E. Hahn, The ethical doxographies of Arius Didymus, ANRW II 364 (1990), 3012.
24. D. Runia, Areios Didymos, DNP 1 (1996), 1041-42.
25. J. Mansfeld, Doxographical studies, Quellenforschung, tabular presentation and other varieties of comparativism, in: W. Burkert et al. (eds.), Fragmentsammlungen philosophischer Texte der Antike. Göttingen 1998, 26.
26. I. Teil, Die Philosophie des Altertums, 11. Aufl., Berlin 1920, 17.
27. J. Mansfeld, Sources, in: K. Algra et al. (eds.), The Cambridge history of Hellenistic philosophy, Cambridge 1999, 16-17.
28. J. Mansfeld, Doxography and dialectic: The Sitz im Leben of the ‘Placita’, ANRWII 36.4 (1990).
29. D. Runia, Xenophanes or Theophrastus? An Aëtian doxographicum on the sun, in: W. Fortenbaugh, D. Gutas (eds.), Theophrastus of Eresus: His psychological, doxographical and scientific writings, New Brunswick 1992, 116.
30. J. Mansfeld, Physikai doxai and Problèmata physica from Aristotle to Aëtius (and beyond), in: Fortenbaugh, Gutas (n. 39), 64-65.
31. R. W. Sharpies, Theophrastus of Eresus. Commentary, Sources on physics, Leiden 1998, vol. 31, 10.
32. F. Wehrli, Theophrast, in: H. Flashar (ed.), Die Philosophie der Antike, Bd. 3, Basel 1983, 489.
33. K. von Fritz, Democritus' theory of vision, in: E. Underwood (ed.), Science, medicine and history, Essays written in honour of Ch. Singer, vol. 1, Oxford 1953, 83.
34. Aristote et la structure du De sensibus de Théophraste, Phronesis 41 (1996), 158-88.
35. G. M. Stratton, Theophrastus and the Greek physiological psychology before Aristotle, London 1917, 58.
36. L. Zhmud, Eudemus' history of mathematics, in: W. Fortenbaugh, I. Bodnar (eds.), Eudemus of Rhodes, RUSCH vol. 11, New Brunswick 2002 (in press).
37. W. Jaeger, Ree, AJP 58 (1937), 354.
38. R. W. Sharpies, Theophrastus on the heavens, in: J. Wiesner (ed.), Aristoteles Werk und Wirkung, Bd. 1, Berlin 1985, 577-93.
39. J. Partsch, Des Aristoteles Buch “Überdas Steigen des Nil”, ASGW 27 (1909), 555.
40. A. Patzer, Der Sophist Hippias als Philosophiehistoriker, Freiburg 1986.
41. O. Regenbogen, Hermann Diels (1922).
42. J. Mansfeld, Die Vorsokratiker, Stuttgart 1983, 30.
43. D. Runia, Ree., Vigilia Christiana 51 (1997), 107.
44. G. E. R. Lloyd, Aristotle's zoology and his metaphysics: The status quaestionis. A critical review of some recent theories, in: Methods and problems in Greek science, Cambridge 1991, 373-396.
45. H. Cherniss, Aristotle's criticism of Plato and the Academy, New York 1962, 27.
46. J. Mansfeld, Chrysippus and the Placita, Phronesis 34 (1989), 314.
47. J. Wiesner, Theophrast und der Beginn des Archereferats von Simplikios' Physikkommentar, Hermes 117 (1989), 288-303.
48. A. Laks, Du témoignage comme fragment, in: G. W. Most (ed.), Collecting fragments/Fragmente sammeln, Göttingen 1997, 257-63.
49. O. Primavesi, Die Aristotelische Topik, München 1996.
50. D. Devereux, Comments on Robert Bolton's ‘The epistemological basis of Aristotelian dialectic’, in: D. Devereux, P. Pellegrin (eds.), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote, Paris 1990, 263-86.
51. P. Slomkowski, Aristotle's Topics, Leiden 1997.
52. E. Kapp, Syllogistik, RE IVA (1932), 1056.
53. R. Robinson, Plato's earlier dialectic, 2n¿ ed., Oxford 1953, 91.
54. J. Balty-Fontaine, Pour une édition nouvelle du “Liber Aristotelis de Inundatione Nili”, Chronique d'Égypte 34 (1959), 95-102.
55. D. Bonneau, Liber Aristotelis De inundatione Nili, Études de Papyrologie 9 (1971), 1-33.
56. M. Bollack, La raison de Lucrèce. Paris 1979, 539.
57. M. Frede, Ree., Phronesis, 44. 2 (1999), 137.