Recent developments in English intensifiers: The case of very much

English Language and Linguistics

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 221-243

  González Díaz, Victorina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61449259034     PISSN: 13606743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1360674308002608     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adamson, Sylvia & Victorina González-Díaz. 2004. Back to the very beginning: The development of intensifiers in Early Modern English. Presented at the Thirteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Vienna
2. Aston, Guy & Lou Burnard. 1998. The BNC handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
3. Bauer, Laurie & Winifred Bauer. 2002. Adjective boosters in the English of young New Zealanders. Journal of English Linguistics 30, 244-57
4. Behre, Frank. 1967. Studies in Agatha Christie's writings. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University Press
5. Biber, Douglas, Edward Finegan & Dwight Atkinson. 1994. ARCHER and its challenges: Compiling and exploring a representative corpus of historical English registers. In Udo Fries, Gunnel Tottie & Peter Schneider (eds.), Creating and using English language corpora, 1-14. Amsterdam: Rodopi
6. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman
7. Blake, Norman F. 1981. Non-standard language in English literature. London: Deutsch
8. Bolinger, Dwight L. 1972. Degree words. The Hague and Paris: Mouton
9. Bolinger, Dwight. 1980. Language - the loaded weapon. London: Longman
10. Breivik, Leiv & Toril Swan. 1994. Initial adverbials and word order in English with special reference to the Early Modern English period. In Kastovsky (ed.), 11-43
11. Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation. New York: Cambridge University Press
12. Dekeyser, Xavier. 1994. The multal quantifiers much/many and their analogues: A historical lexico-semantic analysis. Leuvense Bijdragen 83, 289-99
13. Dixon, R. M. W. 2005. A semantic approach to English grammar, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press
14. Gilbert, Abraham J. 1979. Literary language from Chaucer to Johnson. London: Macmillan
15. González-Díaz, Victorina. 2005. Much and very much: Very much the same thing? Presented at New Reflections on Grammaticalization 3, Santiago de Compostela
16. Greenbaum, Sidney. 1970. Verb-intensifier collocations in English: An experimental approach. The Hague: Mouton
17. Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold
18. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
19. Ito, Rika & Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2003. Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 32, 257-79
20. Kennedy, Graeme. 2003. Amplifier collocations in the British National Corpus: Implications for English language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 37, 467-87
21. Marckwardt, Albert H. 1970. Much and many: The historical development of a Modern English distributional pattern. In James L. Rosier (ed.), Philological essays: Studies in Old and Middle English language and literature in honour of Herbert Dean Meritt, 50-4. The Hague: Mouton
22. McCarthy, Michael. 2002. Good listenership made plain: British and American non-minimal response tokens in everyday conversation. In Randi Reppen, Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Douglas Biber (eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation, 49-71. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
23. Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2003. On intensifiers and grammaticalization: The case of swipe. English Studies 84, 372-91
24. Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique
25. Nevalainen, Terttu & Matti Rissanen. 2002. Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences 24, 359-80
26. Nevalainen, Terttu. 1994. Aspects of adverbial change in Early Modern English. In Kastovsky (ed.), 243-59
27. OED = Oxford English dictionary, 2nd edn. 1989. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online version with revisions: www.oed.com
28. Paradis, Carita. 1997. Degree modifiers of adjectives in spoken British English (Lund Studies in English 92). Lund: Lund University Press
29. Paradis, Carita. 2003. Between epistemic modality and degree: The case of really. In Roberta Facchinetti, Frank Palmer & Manfred Krug (eds.), Modality in contemporary English, 197-220. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
30. Peters, Hans. 1994. Degree adverbs in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 269-88. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
31. Pyles, Thomas & John Algeo. 1993. The origins and development of the English language, 4th edn. Boston: Heinle
32. Quirk, Randolf, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman
33. Swan, Toril. 1991. Adverbial shifts: Evidence from Norwegian and English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax, 409-38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
34. Tao, Hongyin. 2007. A corpus-based investigation of absolutely and related phenomena in spoken American English. Journal of English Linguistics 35 (1), 5-29
35. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1990. From less to more situated in language: The unidirectionality of semantic change. In Sylvia Adamson, Vivien Law, Nigel Vincent & Susan Wright (eds.), Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, 497-517. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
36. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Presented at the Twelfth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester
37. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press