Cross-cultural differences in apology

International Journal of Intercultural Relations

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 32-45

  Guan, Xiaowen ^a   Park, Hee Sun ^b   Lee, Hye Eun ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Apology; China; Estimation; Friend; Intention to apologize; Korea; Self other discrepancy; Stranger; U.S.

Indexed keywords

EID: 61449222083     PISSN: 01471767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J., and Beckman J. (Eds). Action-control: From cognitions to behavior (1985), Springer, New York 11-39
2. Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality and behavior (1988), Open University Press, Milton-Keynes, England
3. Ajzen I., and Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (1980), Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, NJ
4. Barnlund D.C., and Yoshioka M. Apologies: Japanese and American styles. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 14 (1990) 193-206
5. Bond M.H., and Cheung T.S. The spontaneous self-concept of college students in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 14 (1983) 153-171
6. Brown J.D. Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition 4 (1986) 353-376
7. Brown P., and Levinson S.C. Politeness: Some universals in language usages (1987), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
8. Campbell J.D. Similarity and uniqueness: The effects of attribute type, relevance, and individual differences in self-esteem and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (1986) 281-294
9. Cialdini R.B., Reno R.R., and Kallgren C.A. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (1990) 1015-1026
10. Cupach W.R., and Imahori T.T. Managing social predicaments created by others: A comparison of Japanese and American facework. Western Journal of Communication 57 (1993) 431-444
11. Diener E., Suh E.M., Smith H., and Shao L. National differences in reported subjective well-being: Why do they occur?. Social Indicators Research 34 (1995) 7-32
12. Fraser B. On apologizing. In: Coulmas F. (Ed). Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and patterned speech (1981), Mouton, Netherlands 259-271
13. Garcia C. Apologizing in English: Politeness strategies used by native and non-native speakers. Multilingua 8 (1989) 3-20
14. Goffman E. Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order (1971), Harper & Row, New York
15. Guan, X. (2008). Face and facework in well-meaning clashes: How Americans manage face threatening acts in intercultural communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
16. Haley J.O. Apology and pardon: Learning from Japan. American Behavioral Scientist 41 (1998) 842-867
17. Hall E.T. The power of hidden culture. In: Bennett M.J. (Ed). Basic concepts of intercultural communication: Selected readings (1998), Intercultural Press, Yarmouth, ME 53-68
18. Heine S.J., Kitayama S., and Lehman D.R. Cultural differences in self-evaluation: Japanese readily accept negative self-relevant information. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32 (2001) 434-443
19. Hofstede G. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (1980), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
20. Hofstede G. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations (2001), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
21. Holtgraves T. The linguistic realization of face management: Implications for language production and comprehension, person perception, and cross-cultural communication. Social Psychology Quarterly 55 (1992) 141-159
22. Institute of International Education. (2007, November 12). Open doors report. Retrieved January 30, 2008, from http://opendoors.iienetwork.org/.
23. Jung E.H. The acquisition of communicative competence in a second language. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 3 (1999) 13-37
24. Kagitçibasi C. A critical appraisal of individualism and collectivism: Toward a new formulation. In: Kim U., Triandis H.C., Kagitçibasi C., Choi S.-C., and Yoon G. (Eds). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (1994), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 52-65
25. Kim M.-S., and Hunter J.E. Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior: A meta-analysis of past research, part 2. Communication Research 20 (1993) 331-364
26. Kim U. Individualism and collectivism: Conceptual clarification and elaboration. In: Kim U., Triandis H.C., Kagitçibasi C., Choi S.-C., and Yoon G. (Eds). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (1994), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 19-40
27. Kitayama S., and Uchida Y. Explicit self-criticism and implicit self-regard: Evaluating self and friend in two cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39 (2003) 476-482
28. Kitayama S., Markus H.R., Matsumoto H., and Norasakkunkit V. Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (1997) 1245-1267
29. Kurman J. Self-enhancement: Is it restricted to individualistic cultures?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 (2001) 1705-1716
30. Levine T.R., Bresnahan M.J., Park H.S., Lapinski M.K., Wittenbaum G.M., Shearman S.M., et al. Self-construal scales lack validity. Human Communication Research 29 (2003) 210-252
31. Levine T.R., Park H.S., and Kim R.K. Some conceptual and theoretical challenges for cross-cultural communication research in the 21st century. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 36 (2007) 205-221
32. Locke K.D. Connecting the horizontal dimension of social comparison with self-worth and self-confidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31 (2005) 795-803
33. Malle B.F., and Knobe J. The distinction between desire and intention: A folk-conceptual analysis. In: Malle B.F., Moses L.J., and Baldwin D.A. (Eds). Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (2001), MIT press, Cambridge, MA 45-67
34. Mao L.R. Beyond politeness theory: "Face" revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics 21 (1994) 451-486
35. Marks G. Thinking one's abilities are unique and one's opinions are common. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 10 (1984) 203-208
36. Markus H.R., and Kitayama S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 98 (1991) 224-253
37. Mir M. Do we all apologize the same?: An empirical study on the act of apologizing by Spanish speakers learning English. Pragmatics and Language Learning 3 (1992) 1-19
38. Olshtain E. Apologies across languages. In: Blum-Kulka S., House J., and Kasper G. (Eds). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (1989), Ablex, Norwood, NJ 155-173
39. Owen M. Apologies and remedial exchanges: A study of language use in social interaction (1983), Mouton, New York
40. Oyserman D., Coon H.M., and Kemmelmeier M. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 128 (2002) 3-72
41. Park H.S., and Ahn J.Y. Cultural differences in judgment of truthful and deceptive messages. Western Journal of Communication 71 (2007) 294-315
42. Park H.S., and Ahn J.Y. Cultural differences in estimation of other people's self-construals: Comparison of Korea and USA. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 11 3 (2008) 208-213
43. Park H.S., and Guan X. The effects of national culture and face concerns on intention to apologize: A comparison of USA and China. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 35 (2006) 183-204
44. Park, H. S., & Guan, X. (2009). Culture, positive and negative face threats, and apology intentions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.
45. Park H.S., Lee H.E., and Song J.A. "I am sorry to send you SPAM": Cross-cultural differences in use of apologies in e-mail advertising in Korea and USA. Human Communication Research 31 (2005) 365-398
46. Perugini M., and Bagozzi R.P. The distinction between desires and intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology 34 (2004) 69-84
47. Rhee E., Uleman J.S., and Lee H.K. Variations in collectivism and individualism by ingroup and culture: Confirmatory factor analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1996) 1037-1054
48. Sastry J., and Ross C.E. Asian ethnicity and the sense of personal control. Social Psychology Quarterly 61 (1998) 101-120
49. Schlenker B.R., and Darby B.W. The use of apologies in social predicaments. Social Psychology Quarterly 44 (1981) 271-278
50. Sedikides C., Gaertner L., and Toguchi Y. Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 (2003) 60-79
51. Sugimoto N. A Japan-U.S. comparison of apology styles. Communication Research 24 (1997) 349-369
52. Sugimoto N. Norms of apology depicted in U.S. American and Japanese literature on manners and etiquette. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22 (1998) 251-276
53. Tesser A. Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In: Berkowitz L. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 21 (1988), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 181-227
54. Tesser A., and Paulhus D. The definition of self: Private and public self-evaluation management strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (1983) 672-682
55. Ting-Toomey S. Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory. In: Kim Y., and Gudykunst W. (Eds). Theories in intercultural communication (1988), Sage, Newbury Park, CA 213-235
56. Triandis H.C. Collectivism v. individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural social psychology. In: Verma G.K., and Bagley C. (Eds). Cross-cultural studies of personality, attitudes and cognition (1988), St. Martin's Press, New York 60-95
57. Triandis H.C. Individualism and collectivism (1995), Westview, Boulder, CL
58. Wagatsuma H., and Rosett A. The implications of apology: Law and culture in Japan and the United States. Law and Society Review 20 (1986) 461-498
59. Wierzbicka A. Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction (1991), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
60. Williams A., Ota H., Giles H., Pierson H.D., Gallois C., Ng S.-H., et al. Young people's beliefs about intergenerational communication: An initial cross-cultural comparison. Communication Research 24 (1997) 370-393
61. Wills T.A. Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin 90 (1981) 245-271
62. Wolfson N., Marmor T., and Jones S. Problems in the comparison of speech acts across cultures. In: Blum-Kulka S., House J., and Kasper G. (Eds). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (1989), Ablex, Norwood, NJ 174-196
63. Wong N.Y., and Bagozzi R.P. Emotional intensity as a function of psychological distance and cultural orientation. Journal of Business Research 58 (2005) 533-542
64. Wood J.V. What is social comparison and how should we study it?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (1996) 520-537
65. Yu M. Universalistic and culture-specific perspectives on variation in the acquisition of pragmatic competence in a second language. Pragmatics 9 (1999) 281-312
66. Yu M. On the universality of face: Evidence from Chinese compliment response behavior. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (2003) 1679-1710
67. Yu M. Sociolinguistic competence in the complimenting act of native Chinese and American English speakers: A mirror of cultural value. Language and Speech 48 (2005) 91-119