Effect of radiation monitoring method and formula differences on estimated physician dose during percutaneous coronary intervention

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 170-173

  Chida, K ^a   Morishima, Y ^b   Masuyama, H ^b   Chiba, H ^b   Katahira, Y ^b   Inaba, Y ^b   Mori, I ^b   Maruoka, S ^b   Takahashi, S ^b   Kohzuki, M ^b   Zuguchi, M ^b  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Catheterization; Coronary intervention; Interventional; Radiation exposure; Radiation safety

Indexed keywords

BLOOD PRESSURE; DOSIMETERS; DOSIMETRY; MONITORING; NUCLEAR REACTORS; RADIATION SHIELDING;

ANGIOPLASTY; CATHETERIZATION; CORONARY INTERVENTION; INTERVENTIONAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION SAFETY;

RADIATION;

ARTICLE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MATHEMATICS; METHODOLOGY; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PHYSICIAN; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOMETRY;

HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PHYSICIANS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; RADIOMETRY;

EID: 61449217205     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850802616745     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Sovik E, Klow NE, Hellesnes J, Lykke J. Radiationinduced skin injury after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Case report. Acta Radiol 1996; 37:305-6.
2. Fransson S-G, Persliden AJ. Patient radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention. Acta Radiol 2000;41:142-4.
3. International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 85: avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 2001;30/2:Publication 85.
4. Chida K, Saito H, Zuguchi M, Shirotori K, Kumagai S, Nakayama H, et al. Does digital acquisition reduce patients' skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures? An experimental study. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 1111-4.
5. Hirshfeld JW, Baiter S, Brinker JA, Kern MJ, Klein LW, Lindsay BD, et al. ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association American. College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. Circulation 2005;111:511-32.
6. Chida K, Fuda K, Kagaya Y, Saito H, Takai Y, Kohzuki M, et al. Influence of the target vessel on the location and area of maximum skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention. Acta Radiol 2007; 48:846-50.
7. Chida K, Fuda K, Saito H, Takai Y, Takahashi S, Yamada S, et al. Patient skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures: conventional fluoroscopy versus pulsed fluoroscopy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69:115-21.
8. Chida K, Kagaya Y, Saito H, Takai Y, Takahashi S, Yamada S, et al. Total entrance skin dose: an effective indicator of maximum radiation dose to the skin during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:W224-7.
9. Vano E, Gonzalez L, Beneytez F, Moreno F. Lens injuries induced by occupational exposure in nonoptimized interventional radiology laboratories. Br J Radiol 1998;71:728-33.
10. Baiter S. Stray radiation in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Radiat Prot Dosim 2001;94:183-8.
11. Kuon E, Schmitt M, Dahm JB. Significant reduction of radiation exposure to operator and staff during cardiac interventions by analysis of radiation leakage and improved lead shielding. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:44-9.
12. Bairn DS. Proper use of cineangiographic equipment and contrast agents. In: Bairn DS, Grossman W, editors. Grossman's cardiac catheterization, angiography, and intervention. 6th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 15-34.
13. American College of Cardiology: ACC expert consensus document. Radiation safety in the practice of cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:892-913.
14. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1995. Use of personal monitors to estimate effective dose equivalent and effective dose to workers for external exposure to low-LET radiation. NCRP report no. 122. Maryland: NCRP; 1995.
15. The Radiation Council, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. August 21, 2001.