Modeling ideal treatment recommendations: A factorial survey of swedish social workers' ideal recommendations of inpatient or outpatient treatment for problem substance users

Journal of Social Service Research

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 47-64

  Wallander, Lisa ^a   Blomqvist, Jan ^b  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Factorial survey approach; Multilevel analysis; Professional judgement; Social services; Substance misuse; Treatment recommendations

Indexed keywords

EID: 61449182905     PISSN: 01488376     EISSN: 15407314     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01488370802477436     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bergmark, A. (1994). Socialbidragen i den nya socialtjänsten [Welfare benefits in the new social services]. In U. Pettersson (Ed.), Socialtjanstens klien-tarbete: Fran vision till marknad? (pp. 25-50). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
2. Bergmark, A., & Oscarsson, L. (1991). Does anybody really know what they are doing? Some comments related to methodology of treatment service research. British Journal of Addiction, 86(2), 139-142.
3. Blomqvist, J. (1991). Rätt behandling för rätt klient: Ingen enkel match [The right treatment for the right client: No easy "match"] (Report No. 14). Stockholm: Social Services Administration, Research and Development Unit.
4. Blomqvist, J. (1996). Från ideologi till ekonomi: Institu-tionsförlagd missbrukarvård under tre decennier [From ideology to economy: Inpatient substance misuse treatment over three decades] (Report No. 2). Stockholm: Social Services Administration, Research and Development Unit.
5. Blomqvist, J. (2006, June). Societal images of addiction and recovery: First results from a Swedish representative study. Paper presented at the annual symposium of the Kettil Bruun Society, Maastricht, Netherlands.
6. Blomqvist, J., & Wallander, L. (2004). Åt var och en vad hon behöver? En vinjettstudie av socialarbetares bedömningar och val av insatser vid missbruksproblem [To each according to her needs? A vignette study of social workerś judgements and choices of treatments for substance misuse] (Report No. 8). Stockholm: Social Services Administration, Research and Development Unit.
7. Breslin, F. C, Gladwin, C. H., Borsoi, D., & Cunningham, J. A. (2000). Defacto client-treatment matching: How clinicians make referrals to outpatient treatments for substance use. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23(3), 281-291.
8. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Care of Abusers (Special Provisions) Act. (1988). Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
10. Centre for Evaluation of Social Services. (1996). Doku-mentation inom missbrukarvarden: Behandlingsa rbete, metodutveckling, utvardering [Documentation in substance misuse care: Treatment, methodological development, evaluation]. Stockholm: Liber.
11. Centre for Evaluation of Social Services. (1999). ASI: En strukturerad intervjumetod för bedömning av alkohol-och narkotikarelaterade problem[ASI: A structured interview method for assessing problems related to alcohol and narcotics] (2nded.). Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
12. Ekendahl, M. (1999). Att välja vårdform: En studie inom fyra kommuners öppna alkoholvård[Choosing forms of treatment: A study of outpatient alcohol treatment in four municipalities]. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
13. Ekendahl, M. (2004). Omöjlighetens praktik: En studie av socialtjänstens LVM-handläggning [Practising the impossible: A study of the social serviceś management of compulsory care cases]. In research supplement to SOU, Official Reports of the Swedish Government, Tvång och förändring: Rättssdkerhet, vårdens innehåll och eftervård (Report No. 3, pp. 167-264). Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
14. Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871-895.
15. Gambrill, E. D. (2006). Social work practice: A critical thinkeŕs guide. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Glaser, F. B., & Skinner, H. A. (1981). Matching in the real world: A practical approach. In E. A. Gottheil, A. T. McLellan, & K. A. Druley (Eds.), Matching patient needs and treatment methods in alcoholism and drug abuse. (pp. 295-324) Springfield, IL: Thomas Publisher.
17. Holmberg, R. (1992). Matchning i praktiken: En studie av tillvägagångssätt vid val av behandling för missbrukare inom fyra socialdistrikt i Stockholm [Client-treatment matching in practice: A study of the courses of action when choosing treatments for problem substance users in four local districts in Stockholm] (Report No. 1). Stockholm: Social Services Administration, Research and Development Unit.
18. Hox, J. J. (1995). Applied multilevel analysis. Amsterdam: TT-publikaties.
19. Hox, J. J., Kreft, I. G. G., & Hermkens, P. L. J. (1991). The analysis of factorial surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 19(4), 493-510.
20. Hübner, L. (2001). Narkotika och alkohol i den allmänna opinionen[Narcotics and alcohol in the public opinion]. Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University, 2001.
21. Institute of Medicine. (1990). Broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22. Klingemann, H, Sobell, J., Barker, J., Blomqvist, J., Cloud, W., Ellinstad, T., et al. (2001). Promoting self-change from problem substance use: Practical implications for policy, prevention and treatment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
23. Lindström, L. (1992). Managing alcoholism: Matching clients to treatments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
25. Lordan, E. J., Kelley, J. M., Peters, C. P., & Siegfried, R. J. (1997). Treatment placement decisions: How substance abuse professionals assess and place clients. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20(2), 137-149.
26. Menard, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis (2nd ed.). In Quantitative applications in the social sciences series. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications.
27. Miller, W. R., & Hester, R. K. (1986). Inpatient alcoholism treatment: Who benefits? American Psychologist, 41(1), 794-805.
28. National Board of Health and Welfare. (1996). Kursändring i missbrukarvården: Mot öppna former[A change of course in the treatment of problem substance users: Towards outpatient care] (Report No. 3). Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
29. National Board of Health and Welfare. (1998). Balans i missbrukarvården? Resurser och insatser i öppenvdrd och institutionsvård[Balance in the substance misuse care system? Resources and treatment interventions in outpatient and inpatient care]. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
30. National Board of Health and Welfare. (2003a). Knowledge development in social services: A presentation of the project for national support. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
31. National Board of Health and Welfare. (2003b). Missbrukare och övriga vuxna: Insatser år 2002[Problem substance users and other adults: Interventions during the year 2002] (Report No. 6). Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare, Statistics Social Services.
32. National Board of Health and Welfare. (2004). Narko-manvård på lika villkor? En studie av forhållanden som kan ha betydelse vid val av insatser inom narkomanvård [Drug treatment on equal terms? A study of important conditions for choices of treatments within substance misuse care], Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
33. National Board of Health and Welfare. (2007). Nationella riktlinjer för missbruks- och beroendevård [National guidelines for substance misuse treatment]. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
34. Öjehagen, A. (2000). Matchning: En vägledning för val av behandling [Matching: A guide for the selection of treatments]. In M. Berglund, S. Andréasson, A. Bergmark, J. Blomqvist, L. Lindström, & L. Oscarsson, et al. (Eds.), Behandling av alkoholproblem: En kunskapsöversikt., (140-160) Stockholm: Liber.
35. Project Match Research Group. (1997). Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH post-treatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58(1), 7-29.
36. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Fai Cheong, Y, & Congdon, R. (2000). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
37. Rosen, A. (1983). Barriers to ulitization of research by social work practitioners. Journal of Social Service Research, 6(3/4), 1-15.
38. Rossi, P. H, & Anderson, A. B. (1982). The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In P. H. Rossi & S. L. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach, (pp. 15-67) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
39. Sobell, M. B., & Sobell, L. C. (1999). Stepped care for alcohol problems: An efficient method for planning and delivering clinical services. In J. A. Tucker, D. A. Donovan, & G. A. Marlatt (Eds.), Changing addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
40. Social Services Act. (2001). Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
41. Social Services Act. (1982). Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
42. Ó Sullivan, T. (1999). Decision-making in social work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Maemillan.
43. The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. (2001). Behandling av alkohol- och narkotikaproblem: En evidensbaserad kunskapssam-manställning[The treatment of problems related to alcohol and narcotics: A review of evidence-based knowledge]. Stockholm: The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care.
44. Taylor, B. J. (2006). Factorial surveys: Using vignettes to study professional judgement. British Journal of Social Work, 36(7), 1187-1207.
45. Wallander, L., & Blomqvist, J. (2005a). Vad styr vårdvalen ? En faktoriell survey av faktorer som predicerar val av insats inom socialtjänstens missbruksvärd [What factors influence treatment referrals? A factorial survey of predictors of choices of treatment within the social serviceś substance misuse treatment system] (Report No. 3). Stockholm: Stockholm City, Research and Development Unit.
46. Wallander, L., & Blomqvist, J. (2005b). Who "needs" compulsory care? A factorial survey of Swedish social workerś assessments of clients in relation to the "Care of Abusers (Special Provisions) Act." Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs,22(English Suppl.), 63-85.