Estimating intervention effects in a complex multi-level smoking prevention study

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 463-477

  Falcaro, Milena ^a   Povey, Andrew C ^a   Fielder, Anne ^a   Nahit, Elizabeth ^a   Pickles, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL CHILD; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; SMOKING;

EID: 61449163152     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16604601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph6020463     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. de Vries, H.; Dijk, F.; Wetzels, J.; Mudde, A.; Kremers, S.; Ariza, C.; Vitória, P.D.; Fielder, A.; Holm, K.; Janssen, K.; Lehtovuori, R.; Candel, M. The European Smoking prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): effects after 24 and 30 months. Health Educ. Res. 2006, 21, 116-132.
2. Flay, B.R. Youth tobacco use: risks, patterns, and control. In: Nicotine addiction: principles and management. Orleans, C.T., Slade, J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, USA, 1993.
3. Robinson, L.A.; Klesges, R.C.; Zbikowski, S.M.; Glaser, R. Predictors of risk for different stages of adolescent smoking in a biracial sample. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1997, 65, 653-662.
4. Dolcini, M.M.; Adler, N.E.; Ginsberg, D. Factors influencing agreement between self-reports and biological measures of smoking among adolescents. J. Res. Adoles. 1996, 6, 515-542.
5. Murray, D.M.; O'Connell, C.M.; Schmid, L.A.; Perry, C.L. The validity of smoking self-reports by adolescents: a re-examination of the bogus pipeline procedure. Addict. Behav. 1987, 12, 7-15.
6. Hill, A.B. Principles of Medical Statistics. The Lancet Limited: London, UK, 1961.
7. Brittain, E.; Lin, D. A comparison of intent-to-treat and per-protocol results in antibiotic noninferiority trials. Stat. Med. 2005, 24, 1-10.
8. Lee, Y.J.; Ellenberg, J.H.; Hirtz, D.G.; Nelson, K.B. Analysis of clinical trials by treatment actually received: is it really an option? Stat. Med. 1991, 10, 1595-1605.
9. Rosenbaum, P.R.; Rubin, D.B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983, 70, 41-55.
10. D'Agostino, R.B. Jr. Tutorial in Biostatistics: propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat. Med. 1998, 17, 2265-2281.
11. Bowden, R.J.; Turkington, D.A. Instrumental variables. Cambridge University Press: New York, USA, 1984.
12. Greene, W. Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, 1997.
13. Foster, E.M. IV for logistic regression: an illustration. Soc. Sci. Res. 1997, 26, 487-504.
14. Hardin, J.W. sg61: Bivariate probit models. Stata Tech. Bull. 1996, 33, 15-20.
15. Rabe-Hesketh, S.; Skrondal, A.; Pickles, A. GLLAMM Manual. Working Paper 160. U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Berkeley Electronic Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2004.
16. Brick, J.M.; Kalton, G. Handling missing data in survey research. Stat. Method. Med. Res. 1996, 5, 215-238.
17. Pfeffermann, D. The role of sampling weights when modeling survey data. Int. Stat. Rev. 1993, 61, 317-337.
18. Diggle, P.J.; Heagarty, P.J.; Liang, K-Y.; Zeger, S.L. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford University Press: New York, USA, 2003.
19. Zeger, S.L.; Liang, K-Y. An overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal data. Stat. Med. 1992, 11, 1825-1839.
20. Laird, N.M.; Ware, J.H. Random effects models for longitudinal data: an overview of recent results. Biometrics 1982, 38, 963-974.
21. Liang, K-Y.; Zeger, S.L. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986, 73, 13-22.
22. Zeger, S.L.; Liang, K-Y.; Albert, P.S. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 1988, 44, 1049-1060.
23. Huber, P.J. The behaviour of maximum likelihood estimators under non-standard conditions. In Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. University of California Press: Berkeley, USA, 1967; pp. 221-233.
24. Royall, R.M. Model robust confidence intervals using maximum likelihood estimators. Int. Stat. Rev. 1986, 54, 221-226.
25. Stata Corp. Stata Statistical Software: release 8.0. Stata press: Lakeway Drive College Station, USA, 2003.
26. Wiehe, S.E.; Garrison, M.M.; Christakis, D.A.; Ebel, B.E.; Rivara, F.P. A systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term follow-up. J. Adolesc. Health 2005, 36, 162-169.
27. Sussman, S.; Sun, P.; Dent, C.W. A meta-analysis of teen cigarette smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 2006, 25, 549-557.
28. Thomas, R.E.; Perera, R. School-based programmes for preventing smoking. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2006, Issue 3, Art. No.: CD001293.
29. Skara, S.; Sussman, S. A review of 25 long-term adolescent tobacco and other drug use prevention program evaluations. Prev. Med. 2003, 37, 451-474.
30. Aveyard, P.; Markham, W.A.; Almond, J.; Lancashire, E.; Cheng, K.K. The risk of smoking in relation to engagement with a school-based smoking intervention. Soc. Sci. Med. 2003, 56, 869-882.
31. Heckman, J. Instrumental variables: a study of implicit behavioral assumptions used in making program evaluations. J. Human Resour. 1997, 32, 441-462.
32. Pearl, J. Causality: models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge University Press: New York, USA, 2000.
33. Frangakis, C.E.; Rubin, D.B. Addressing complications of intention-to-treat analysis in the combined presence of all-or-none treatment-noncompliance and subsequent missing outcomes. Biometrika 1999, 86, 365-379.
34. Imbens, G.; Angrist, J. Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 1994, 62, 467-475.
35. Leigh, J.P.; Schembri, M. Instrumental variables technique: cigarette price provided better estimate of effects of smoking on SF-12. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2004, 57, 284-293.
36. Davey Smith, G.; Ebrahim, S. 'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int. J. Epidemiol. 2003, 32, 1-22.