Nano Mapper: An Internet knowledge mapping system for nanotechnology development

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 529-552

  Li, Xin ^a   Hu, Daning ^a   Dang, Yan ^a   Chen, Hsinchun ^a   Roco, Mihail C ^b   Larson, Catherine A ^a   Chan, Joyce ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Bibliographic analysis; Citation network; Data analysis tool; Grant analysis; Information visualization; Nanotechnology; Patent analysis; Research and development (R D); Self organizing maps

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; CITATION NETWORK; DATA ANALYSIS TOOL; GRANT ANALYSIS; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; PATENT ANALYSIS;

CONFORMAL MAPPING; DATA VISUALIZATION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; SELF ORGANIZING MAPS; VISUALIZATION; WORLD WIDE WEB;

NANOTECHNOLOGY;

DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DATA BASE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNET; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PATENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REVIEW;

EID: 61449128228     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-008-9491-z     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. J Adams Z Griliches 1998 Research productivity in a system of universities Ann INSEE 49 50 127 162
2. Arora A, Gambardella A (1998) The impact of NSF Support for basic research in economics. Economics Working Paper Archive at WUSTL
3. H Chen C Schuffels R Orwig 1996 Internet categorization and search: a self-organizing approach J Vis Commun Image Represent 7 1 88 102
4. H Chen MC Roco X Li Y Lin 2008 Trends in nanotechnology patents Nat Nanotechnol 3 3 123 125 10.1038/nnano.2008.51
5. P Criscuolo 2006 The 'home advantage' effect and patent families. A comparison of OECD triadic patents, the USPTO and the EPO Scientometrics 66 1 23 41
6. European Commission (1997) Second European Report on S&T Indicators. European Commission, Bruxelles
7. P Ganguli 1998 Intellectual property rights in transition World Patent Inf 20 171 180
8. E Gansner S North 2000 An Open Graph Visualization System and its applications to Software Engineering Software-Pract Exp 30 11 1203 1233
9. MH Huang LY Chiang DZ Chen 2003 Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: a study of Taiwan's high-tech companies Scientometrics 58 3 489 506
10. Z Huang H Chen A Yip G Ng F Guo Z-K Chen 2003 Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: country, institution and technology field J Nanopart Res 5 333 363
11. Z Huang HC Chen ZK Chen MC Roco 2004 International Nanotechnology Development in 2003: country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database J Nanopart Res 6 4 325 354
12. Z Huang HC Chen LJ Yan MC Roco 2005 Longitudinal Nanotechnology Development (1991-2002): National Science Foundation Funding and its impact on patents J Nanopart Res 7 4-5 343 376 10.1007/s11051-005-5468-3
13. Z Huang HC Chen X Li MC Roco 2006 Connecting NSF funding to patent innovation in nanotechnology (2001-2004) J Nanopart Res 8 6 859 879
14. A Hullmann 2006 Who is winning the global nanorace? Nat Nanotechnol 1 2 81 83 10.1038/nnano.2006.110
15. A Hullmann M Meyer 2003 Publications and patents in nanotechnology-an overview of previous studies and the state of the art Scientometrics 58 3 507 527 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006877.45467.a7
16. MM Karki 1997 Patent citation analysis: a policy analysis tool World Patent Inf 19 269 272
17. R Kostoff J Murday C Lau W Tolles 2006 The seminal literature of nanotechnology research J Nanopart Res 8 2 193 213 10.1007/s11051-005-9034-9
18. G Lewison 1998 Gastroenterology research in the United Kingdom: funding sources and impact Gut 43 2 288 293
19. X Li H Chen Z Huang MC Roco 2007 Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976-2004) J Nanopart Res 9 3 337 352
20. X Li YL Lin HC Chen MC Roco 2007 Worldwide nanotechnology development: a comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976-2004) J Nanopart Res 9 6 977 1002 10.1007/s11051-007-9273-z
21. MS Meyer 2001 Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: an exploration of nano-science and nano-technology Scientometrics 51 1 163 183
22. F Narin 1994 Patent bibliometrics Scientometrics 30 1 147 155
23. Narin F (1998) Patents and publicly funded research. Assessing the value of research in the chemical sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 59-72
24. T-H Ong H Chen W-K Sung B Zhu 2005 NewsMap: a knowledge map for online news Decis Support Syst 39 583 597 10.1016/j.dss.2004.03.008
25. Oppenheim C (2000) Do patent citations count? In: Cronin B, Atkins HB (eds) The Web of knowledge-a Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. Information Today, Medford, NJ, ASIS Monograph Series, pp 405-432
26. Payne AA, Siow A (2003) Does federal research funding increase university research output? Adv Econ Anal Policy 3(1):Article 1
27. MC Roco 2005 International perspective on Government Nanotechnology Funding in 2005 J Nanopart Res 7 6 707 712 10.1007/s11051-005-3141-5
28. Roco MC, Williams RS, Alivisatos P (2000) Nanotechnology research directions. Springer, Dordrecht
29. J Schummer 2004 Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology Scientometrics 59 3 425 465 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018542.71314.38