메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 36, Issue SUPPL., 2002, Pages 264-285

Earning the right to realism or relativism in ethics

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 61449118937     PISSN: 00294624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0068.36.s1.9     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (2)

References (13)
  • 1
    • 0001443553 scopus 로고
    • Moral Realism
    • There is a large and varied literature on moral realism that is more or less sympathetic to this proposal. For two central examples, see Peter Railton, "Moral Realism," Philosophical Review, 95 (1986)
    • (1986) Philosophical Review , vol.95
    • Railton, P.1
  • 2
    • 82355169606 scopus 로고
    • Moral Facts and Moral Knowledge
    • Spindel Conference
    • and William Lycan, "Moral Facts and Moral Knowledge," Southern Journal of Philosophy 24, Supplement (1986: Spindel Conference).
    • (1986) Southern Journal of Philosophy , vol.24 , Issue.SUPPL.
    • Lycan, W.1
  • 3
    • 61449177794 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • For reasons of space, I must ignore the fact that there are rival accounts of scientific realism, as well as the fact that there are important objections to scientific realism. I must also forego any detailed account of attempts on the part of ethical theorists to extend the scientific realist position to ethics. The upshot, I fear, will be that I appear insufficiently critical of scientific realism in general and, yet, at the same time, overly critical of its particular bearing in ethics. As I've said, I hope to remedy these deficiencies elsewhere. Here I mean only to say enough to clarify the point of departure for my positive suggestions in this paper, which depart significantly from the scientific realist picture altogether
    • For reasons of space, I must ignore the fact that there are rival accounts of scientific realism, as well as the fact that there are important objections to scientific realism. I must also forego any detailed account of attempts on the part of ethical theorists to extend the scientific realist position to ethics. The upshot, I fear, will be that I appear insufficiently critical of scientific realism in general and, yet, at the same time, overly critical of its particular bearing in ethics. As I've said, I hope to remedy these deficiencies elsewhere. Here I mean only to say enough to clarify the point of departure for my positive suggestions in this paper, which depart significantly from the scientific realist picture altogether.
  • 5
    • 61449090440 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • I realize, of course, that those who propose to model ethical realism on scientific realism are aware of these obvious differences between ethics and science
    • I realize, of course, that those who propose to model ethical realism on scientific realism are aware of these obvious differences between ethics and science.
  • 7
    • 0009220957 scopus 로고
    • What is a Theory of Meaning? (II)
    • Oxford University Press (Oxford:
    • See his "What is a Theory of Meaning? (II)" in G. Evans and J. McDowells, eds. , Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, Oxford University Press (Oxford: 1976).
    • (1976) Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics
    • Evans, G.1    McDowells, J.2
  • 8
    • 0003839704 scopus 로고
    • Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press
    • See his Consequences of Pragmatism (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1982).
    • (1982) Consequences of Pragmatism
  • 9
    • 20844458923 scopus 로고
    • How to Make Our Ideas Clear
    • New York: Dover Publications
    • See his "How to Make Our Ideas Clear" in Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. J. Buchler (New York: Dover Publications, 1955).
    • (1955) Philosophical Writings of Peirce
    • Buchler, J.1
  • 10
    • 0004651070 scopus 로고
    • Moral Relativism Defended
    • See his "Moral Relativism Defended," Philosophical Review 84 (1975).
    • (1975) Philosophical Review , vol.84
  • 11
    • 0040860941 scopus 로고
    • The Truth in Relativism
    • New York: Cambridge University Press
    • I've assembled this defense mainly from two sources: "The Truth in Relativism" in his Moral Luck (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981)
    • (1981) Moral Luck
  • 12
    • 0004195469 scopus 로고
    • Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press
    • and Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1985).
    • (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy
  • 13
    • 61449097529 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • I'd like to thank Stefan Baumrin, Akeel Bilgrami, Patricia Blanchette, Donald Davidson, Michael Della Rocca, Jerrold Katz, Philip Kitcher, Isaac Levi, Achille Varzi, Stephen White, Meredith Williams, Michael Williams, and Susan Wolf for discussing the issues of this paper with me
    • I'd like to thank Stefan Baumrin, Akeel Bilgrami, Patricia Blanchette, Donald Davidson, Michael Della Rocca, Jerrold Katz, Philip Kitcher, Isaac Levi, Achille Varzi, Stephen White, Meredith Williams, Michael Williams, and Susan Wolf for discussing the issues of this paper with me.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.