Editorial judgments, quality scholarship, and the academy of management's journals

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 253-258

  Hitt, Michael A ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Editorial judgments; Editorial review board members; Journal impact; Scholarly productivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 61449083606     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428108315872     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Agarwal, R., & Hoetker, G. (2007). Following legitimacy: Management's Faustian bargain with more established disciplines ? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1304-1322.
2. Baruch, Y., Konrad, A. M., Aguinis, H., & Starbuck, W. H. (Eds.). (2008). Opening the black box of editorship. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
3. Bedeian, A.G., Van Fleet, D.D., & Hyman, H.H. (in press). Scientific achievement and editorial-board membership. Organizational Research Methods.
4. Rynes, S.L. (2006). Getting on board with AMJ: Balancing quality and innovation in the review process. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1097-1102.
5. Smith, K. G., & Hitt, M. A. (Eds.). (2005). Great minds in management: The process of theory development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.