Identification of parameters for a prospect theory model for travel choice analysis

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2082, 2008, Pages 141-147

  Avineri, Erel ^a   Bovy, Piet H L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CONDITION; DECISIONS MAKINGS; DESCRIPTIVE MODEL; PROSPECT THEORY; REFERENCE POINTS; RESEARCH AREAS; RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES; THEORY MODEL; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR MODELING; UNCERTAINTY;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 61349195851     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2082-17     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abdel-Aty, M. A., R. Kitamura, and P. P. Jovanis. Investigating Effect of Travel Time Variability on Route Choice Using Repeated-Measurement Stated Preference Data. In Transportation Research Record 1493, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 39-45.
2. Avineri, E., and J.N. Prashker. Violations of Expected Utility Theory in Route-Choice Stated Preferences: Certainty Effect and Inflation of Small Probabilities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 222-229.
3. Senbil, M., and R. Kitamura. Reference Points in Commuter Departure Time Choice: A. Prospect Theoretic Test of Alternative Decision Frames. Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2004, pp. 19-31.
4. Jackson, B. W., and J. V. Jucker. An Empirical Study of Travel Time Variability and Travel Choice Behaviour. Transportation Science, Vol. 16, 1981, pp. 460-475.
5. Black, I. G., and J. G. Towriss. Demand Effects of Travel Time. Reliability. Centre for Logistics and Transportation, Cranfield Institute of Technology, Cranfield, United Kingdom, 1993.
6. Noland, R. B., and J. W. Polak. Travel Time Variability: A. Review of Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Transport Reviews, Vol. 22, 2002, pp. 39-54.
7. Lam, T. C., and K. A. Small. The Value of Time and Reliability: Measurement from a Value Pricing Experiment. Transportation Research, Part E, Vol. 37, No. 2-3, 2000, pp. 231-251.
8. Lomax, T., D. Schrank, S. Turner, and R. Margiotta. Selecting Travel. Reliability Measures. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003.
9. Brownstone, D., and K. A. Small. Valuing Time and Reliability: Assessing the Evidence from Road Pricing Demonstrations. Transportation Research, Part A, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2005, pp. 279-293.
10. van Lint, J. W. C., and H. J. van Zuylen. Monitoring and Predicting Freeway Travel Time Reliability: Using Width and Skew of Day-to-Day Travel Time Distribution. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1917, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 54-62.
11. Bogers, E., and J. W. C. Van Lint. Traveler's Perception of Reliability: How to Measure and How to Influence. Proc, Third International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (H. J. Van Zuylen, ed.), The Hague, Netherlands, 2007.
12. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under.Ri.sk. Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1979, pp. 263-291.
13. Russo, J. E., and K. A. Carlson. Individual Decision Making. In Handbook of Marketing (B. A. Weitz and R. Wensley, eds.), Sage Publications, London, 2002, pp. 371-408.
14. Benartzi, S., and R. Thaler. Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle. Quarterly Journal of.Economics, Vol. 110,1995, pp. 73-92.
15. Preston, M., and P. Baratta. An Experimental Study of die AuctionValue of an Uncertain Outcome. American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 61, 1948, pp. 183-193.
16. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 9, 1992, pp. 195-230.
17. Wu, G., and R. Gonzalez. Nonlinear Decision Weights in Choice Under Uncertainty. Management Science, Vol. 45, 1999, pp. 74-85.
18. Bateman, I., D. Kahneman, A. Munro, C. Starmer, and R. Sugden. Testing Competing Models of Loss Aversion: An Adversarial Collaboration. Journal of.Public Economics, Vol. 89, 2005, pp. 1561-1580.
19. Harrison, Q. W., and E. E. Rutström. Representative Agents in Lottery Choice Experiments: One Wedding and a Decent Funeral. Working Paper 05-18. Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida, Orlando, 2005.
20. Camerer, C. F., and T.-H. Ho. Violations of the Betweenness Axiom and Nonlinearity in Probability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 8, 1994, pp. 167-196.
21. Wu, G., and R. Gonzalez. Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function. Management Science, Vol. 42, 1996, pp. 1676-1690.
22. Bleichrodt, H., and J. L. Pinto. A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis. Management Science, Vol. 46, 2000, pp. 1485-1496.
23. Avineri, E., and J. N. Prashker. Sensitivity to Uncertainty: Need for a Paradigm Shift. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1854, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 90-98.
24. Avineri, E. The Effect of Reference Point on Stochastic Network Equilibrium. Transportation Science, Vol. 40, 2006, pp. 409-420.
25. Viti, F., E. Bogers, and S. Hoogendoorn. Day-to-Day Learning Under Uncertainty with Information Provision: Model and Data Analysis. Presented at 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, University of Maryland, College Park, July 2005.
26. Avineri, E. A Cumulative Prospect Theory Approach to Passengers Behavior Modeling: Waiting Time Paradox Revisited. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2004, pp. 195-204.
27. Michea, A., and J. Polak. Modelling Risky Choice Behaviour: Evaluating Alternatives to Expected Utility Theory. Presented at 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, Japan, Aug. 2006.
28. Redmond, L. S., and P. L. Mokhtarian. The Positive Utility of the Commute: Modeling Ideal Commute Time and Relative Desired Commute Amount. Transportation, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2001, pp. 179-205.
29. Van de Kaa, E. J. V. Assessment of the Value of Travel Time from Stated Choice Surveys-The Treatment of Lexicographic Answering. Proc., European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France, 2006.
30. Tilahun, N. Y., and D. M. Levinson. Value of Time in the Presence of Unexpected Delay. Proc., The Third International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability, The Hague, Netherlands 2007.
31. Small, K. A. The Scheduling of Consumer Activities: Work Trips. The American Economic Review, Vol. 72, No. 3, 1982, pp. 482-486.
32. Neilson, W., and J. Stowe. A Further Examination of Cumulative Prospect Theory Parameterization. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2002, pp. 31-46.
33. Avineri, E. Incorporating Fuzzy Reference Points into Applications of Travel Choice Modeling. Presented at 12th Online World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications, 2007.
34. Arkes, H. R., D. Hirshleifer, D. Jiang, and S. Lim. Reference Point Adaptation: Tests in the Domain of Security Trading. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 105, No. 1, 2008, pp. 67-81.