Beyond the individual: Concomitants of closeness in the social and physical environment

Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 287-303

  Arriaga, Ximena B ^a   Goodfriend, Wind ^a   Lohmann, Andrew ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61349154290     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Agnew, C. R., Loving, T. J., & Drigotas, S. M. (2001). Substituting the forest for the trees: Social networks and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1042-1057.
2. Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939-954.
3. Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole.
4. Altman, I., Brown, B. B., Staples, B., & Werner, C. M. (1992). A transactional approach to close relationships: Courtship, weddings, and placemaking. In B. Walsh, K. Craik, & R. Price (Eds.), Person-environment psychology (pp. 193-241). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Altman, I., & Ginat, J. (1996). Polygamous families in contemporary society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
6. Altman, I., & Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokols, & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (vol. 1, pp. 7-40). New York: Wiley.
7. Amaturo, E., Costagliola, S., & Ragone, G. (1987). Furnishing and status attributes: A sociological study of the living room. Environment and Behavior, 19, 228-49.
8. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
9. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.
10. Aron, A., & Fraley, B. (1999). Relationship closeness as including the other in the self: Cognitive underpinnings and measures. Social Cognition, 17, 140-160.
11. Arriaga, X. B. (2001). The ups and downs of dating: Fluctuations in satisfaction in newly formed romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 754-765.
12. Brewer, M. B. (1993). The role of distinctiveness in social identity and group behavior. N. M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 1-16). Hertfordshire, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
13. Brewer, M. B. (1993). The role of distinctiveness in social identity and group behavior. N. M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 1-16). Hertfordshire, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
14. Brown, B. B. (1987). Territoriality. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology(Vol. 1, pp. 505-531). New York: Wiley.
15. Cooper, C. (1974). The house as a symbol of self. In J. Lang, C. Burnette, W. Moleski, & D. Vachon (Eds.), Designing for human behavior: Architecture and the behavioral sciences (pp. 130-146). Stroudsberg, PA: Dow-den, Hutchinson, & Ross.
16. Cox, C. L., Wexler, M. O., Rusbult, C. E., & Gaines, S. O., Jr. (1997). Prescriptive support and commitment processes in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 79-90.
17. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
18. Driscoll, R., Davis, K. F., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental interference and romantic love: The Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1-10.
19. Feeney, J. A. (1999). Issues of closeness and distance in dating relationships: Effects of sex and attachment style. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 571-590.
20. Felmlee, D. H. (2001). No couple is an island: A social network perspective on dyadic stability. Social Forces, 79, 1259-1287.
21. Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Bassin, E. (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationships: A hazard model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 13-30.
22. Gosling, S. D., Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Personality Judgments Based on Offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379-398.
23. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
24. Holland, D. C., & Valsiner, J. (1988). Cognition, symbols, and Vygotsky's developmental psychology. Ethos, 16, 247-272.
25. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). Assessing longitudinal change in marriage: An introduction to the analysis of growth curves. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 1091-1108.
26. Kelley, H. H. (1983). The situational origins of human tendencies: A further reason for the formal analysis of structures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 8-36.
27. Kelley, H. H. (1991). Lewin, situations, and interdependence. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 211-233.
28. Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., et al. (Eds.) (1983). Close relationships. New York: W. H. Freeman.
29. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
30. Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31-68.
31. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.
32. Lohmann, A., Arriaga, X. B., & Goodfriend, W. (2003). Close relationships and placemaking: Do objects in a couple's home reflect couplehood? Personal Relationships, 10, 437-449.
33. McMillan, D. W. & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.
34. Milardo, R. M. (1982). Friendship networks in developing relationships: Converging and diverging social environments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 162-172.
35. Milardo, R. M., & Allan, G. (1997). Social networks and marital relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 506-522). New York: Wiley.
36. Milardo, R. M., Helms-Erikson, H. (2000). Network overlap and third-party influence in close relationships. In C. Hendrick & S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 33-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Mindel, C. H. (1980). Extended familism among urban Mexcian Americans, Anglos, and Blacks. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2, 21-34.
38. Parks, M. R. (1997). Communication networks and relationship life cycles. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 351-372). New York: Wiley.
39. Rogosa, D., Brant, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A slow growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 726-748.
40. Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175-204.
41. Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (in press). The foundations of socially situated action: Socially situated cognition. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.
42. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
43. Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and social support determinants of relationship commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318-328.
44. Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). The influence of parents and friends on the quality and stability of romantic relationships: A three-wave longitudinal investigation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 888-900.
45. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
46. Werner, C. M. (1987). Home interiors: A time and place for interpersonal relationships. Environment and Behavior, 19, 169-179.