메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 10, Issue , 2009, Pages

Readers as research detectives

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANALYTICAL RESEARCH; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CRITICAL THINKING; DATA ANALYSIS; ONLINE SYSTEM; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL SECRECY; PUBLICATION; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; CONFIDENTIALITY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL RESEARCH; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 61349101884     PISSN: 17456215     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-2     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (8)

References (10)
  • 1
    • 0043198131 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: A reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?
    • 10.1001/jama.290.7.921 12928469
    • Als-Nielsen B Chen W Gluud C Kjaergard LL Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: A reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? JAMA 2003, 290-921. 8 10.1001/jama.290.7.921 12928469
    • (2003) JAMA , vol.290 , pp. 921-928
    • Als-Nielsen, B.1    Chen, W.2    Gluud, C.3    Kjaergard, L.L.4
  • 2
    • 33747167642 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Believability of relative risks and odds ratios in abstracts: Cross-sectional study
    • 1523498 16854948 10.1136/bmj.38895.410451.79
    • Gøtzsche PC Believability of relative risks and odds ratios in abstracts: Cross-sectional study BMJ 2006, 333:231-4. 1523498 16854948 10.1136/bmj.38895.410451.79
    • (2006) BMJ , vol.333 , pp. 231-234
    • Gøtzsche, P.C.1
  • 3
    • 0002100348 scopus 로고
    • Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research
    • Glass GV Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research Educ Res 1976, 5:3-8.
    • (1976) Educ Res , vol.5 , pp. 3-8
    • Glass, G.V.1
  • 4
    • 2442692780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published articles
    • 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457 15161896
    • Chan A-W Hróbjartsson A Haahr MT Gøtzsche PC Altman DG Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published articles JAMA 2004, 291:2457-65. 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457 15161896
    • (2004) JAMA , vol.291 , pp. 2457-2465
    • Chan, A.-W.1    Hróbjartsson, A.2    Haahr, M.T.3    Gøtzsche, P.C.4    Altman, D.G.5
  • 5
    • 61349176926 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • No short-cut in assessing trial quality: A case study
    • 19128475 10.1186/1745-6215-10-1
    • Hirji KF No short-cut in assessing trial quality: A case study Trials 2009, 10:1. 19128475 10.1186/1745-6215-10-1
    • (2009) Trials , vol.10 , pp. 1
    • Hirji, K.F.1
  • 6
    • 0025476652 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bias in double-blind trials (thesis)
    • 2245657
    • Gøtzsche PC Bias in double-blind trials (thesis) Dan Med Bull 37, 329-36. 2245657
    • Dan Med Bull , vol.37 , pp. 329-336
    • Gøtzsche, P.C.1
  • 7
    • 61349089799 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • CONSORT http://www.consort-statement.org
    • CONSORT


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.