The effects of expressive variation in dynamics on the musical preferences of elementary school students

Journal of Research in Music Education

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 396-404

  Burnsed, Vernon ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61249462974     PISSN: 00224294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3345551     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aiken, L. R. (1976). Psychological testing and assessment (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
2. Bishop, D. (1993). Music impression expression [Computer program]. Blacksburg, VA: Center for Digital Music, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
3. Burnsed, V., Hinkle, D., & King, S. (1985). Performance evaluation reliability at selected concert festivals. Journal of Band Research, 21, 22-29.
4. Burnsed, V., & Sochinski, J. (1995). The effects of expressive variation in dynamics on the musical preferences of middle school music students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 124, 1-12.
5. Erdei, P. (Ed.). (1974). 150 American folk songs: Songs to sing, read and play. New York: Boosey & Hawkes.
6. Ferguson, G. A. (1976). Statistical analysis in psychology & education (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Gabrielsson, A. (Ed.). (1987). Action and perception in rhythm and music. Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
9. Geringer, J. M. (1991). Temporal discrimination of modulated intensity in music excerpts and tones. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 113-120.
10. Geringer, J. M. (1992). An analysis of dynamic contrasts in recorded choral, orchestral, and piano performances. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 112, 51-61.
11. Gordon, E. (1960). An approach to the quantitative study of dynamics. Journal of Research in Music Education, 8, 23-30.
12. Hargreaves, D. J., & Zimmerman, M. P. (1992). Developmental theories of learning. In R. Colwell (Ed.), Handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 377-391). New York: Schirmer Books.
13. HyperCard 2.1 [Computer software]. (1991). Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer.
14. Krumhansl, C. L., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1990). Infants' perception of phrase structure in music. Psychological Science, 1, 70-73.
15. LeBlanc, A. (1987). The development of music preference in children. In J. C. Peery, I. W. Peery, & T. W. Draper (Eds.), Music and child development (pp. 137-157). New York: Springer-Verlag.
16. Nakamura, T. (1987). The communication of dynamics between musicians and listeners through musical performance. Special issue: The understanding of melody and rhythm. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 522-533.
17. Ortmann, O. (1927). Types of listeners. Genetic considerations. In M. Schoen (Ed.), The effects of music (pp. 38-77). Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.
18. Price, H. E. (1986). A proposed glossary for use in affective response literature in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 151-159.
19. Seashore, C. (1938). Psychology of music. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Sims, W. L. (1987). Effect of tempo on music preference of preschool through fourth-grade children. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 15-25). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
21. Smith, R. A. (1992). Toward percipience: A humanities curriculum for arts education. In B. Reimer & R. A. Smith (Eds.), The arts, education, and knowing. Ninety-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 51-69). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Sundberg, J., Askenfelt, A., & Fryden, L. (1983). Musical performance: A synthesis-by-rule approach. Computer Music Journal, 7, 37-43.