Useful knowledge

Proceedings of the British Academy

Volumn 139, Issue , 2006, Pages 73-109

  Strathern, Marilyn ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61249239836     PISSN: 00681202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. In Goodwin v United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR 447 the Court held that English law related to transsexuals violated article 12, but it was not directed to marriage between couples currently of the same sex.
2. Barry, A. (forthcoming), 'Disciplinary and interdisciplinarity', in M. Halewood (ed.), special issue Theory, Culture and Society.
3. Battaglia, D. (1999), 'Towards an ethics of the open subject: writing culture in good conscience', in H. Moore (ed.), Anthropological Theory Today, Cambridge.
4. Beer, G. (1996), Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter, Oxford.
5. Blakemore, C. (2005), 'Cultivating a thousand flowers', FST [Foundation for Science and Technology ] Journal, 18 (8): 8-9.
6. Born, G. (2002), 'Reflexivity and ambivalence: Culture, creativity and government in the BBC, Cultural Values, 6: 65-90.
7. Born, G. (2004), Uncertain Vision: Birt, Dyke and the Reinvention of the BBC, London.
8. Brecher, B. (2005), 'If we insist on playing games . . .', Times Higher Education Supplement, 24 June, 50.
9. Brennan, T. (1993), History after Lacan, London.
10. Brennan, T. (2000), Exhausting Modernity: Grounds for a New Economy, New York.
11. Callon, M. (1998), The Laws of the Markets, Oxford.
12. Clarke, J. (2005), 'Performing for the public: Doubt, desire, and the evaluation of public services', in P. du Gay (ed.)., The Values of Bureaucracy, Oxford.
13. Corsín Jiménez, A. (2004), 'Knowledge travels and ethical remainders', paper delivered to seminar series, 'Anthropology, Ethics and Interdisciplinarity', University of Edinburgh.
14. Corsín Jiménez, A. (2007) 'Industry going public: rethinking knowledge and administration', in P. Wade, J. Edwards and P. Harvey (eds), Anthropology and Science, Oxford and New York.
15. DTI (Department of Trade and Industry) (2001), Quinquennial Review of the Grantawarding Research Councils, Office of Science and Technology, London.
16. du Gay, P. (2000), In Praise of Bureaucracy. Weber, Organization, Ethics. London.
17. Edwards, J. ( 2001), '"Public understanding of science": deficit and democracy', for 'Science and democracy: the Open Society revisited', convenor, N. Rapport, British Association Festival of Science, Glasgow.
18. Ezrahi, Y. (2004), 'Science and the political imagination in contemporary democracies', in S. Jasanoff (ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order, London.
19. Fairhead, J. and M. Leach (2003), Science, Society and Power Environmental Knowledge and Policy in West Africa and the Caribbean, Cambridge.
20. Fayer, H. (2005), Quick read synopsis of R.W. Pearson and L.W. Sherman (2005), special edn. Annals, AAPSS (American Academy of Political and Social Science), 600: 174-188.
21. Fournier, V. and R. Munro (2004), 'Undoing management: markets, virtual absence and the dissemination of managerial practice', unpub. paper, University of Keele.
22. Galison, P. (1997), Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics, Chicago.
23. Gell, A. (1998), Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory, Oxford.
24. Gingrich, A. and R. Fox (eds.) (2002), Introduction to Anthropology, by Comparison, London.
25. Grasseni, C. (2005),' Slow food, fast genes: timescapes of authenticity and innovation in the anthropology of food', Cambridge Anthropology, 25 (2): 79-94.
26. Green, S. (2005), Notes from the Balkans: Locating Marginality and Ambiguity on the Greek-Albanian border, Princeton.
27. Gupta, A. and J. Ferguson (1997), 'Discipline and practice: "the field" as site, method, and location in anthropology', in A. Gupta and J. Ferguson (eds.), Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, Berkeley.
28. Hastrup, K. (2002), 'Anthropology's comparative consciousness: the case of human rights', in A. Gingrich and R. Fox (eds.), Anthropology, by Comparison, London.
29. Hemmings, C. (2005), 'Rethinking medical anthropology: How anthropology is failing medicine', Anthropology and Medicine, 12: 91-103.
30. Henare, A., M. Holbraad and S. Wastell (forthcoming), Thinking Through Things, London.
31. HMSO (Her Majesty's Stationery Office) (2004), Science and Innovation: Working towards a Ten-Year Investment Framework, HM Treasury, Department for Education and Skills, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
32. Ives, W., B. Torrey and C. Gordon (2002), 'Knowledge sharing is a human behavior', in D. Morey, M. Maybury, and B. Thuraisingham (eds.), Knowledge Management: Classic and Contemporary Works, Cambridge, MA
33. Jasanoff, S. (2004), 'The idiom of co-production', in S. Jasanoff (ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order, London.
34. Jean-Klein, I. and Riles, A. (2005), 'Introducing discipline: Anthropology and human rights administrations', PoLAR [Political and Legal Anthropology Review], 28 (2): 173-202.
35. Junnarkar, B. (2002), 'Sharing and building context', Introduction to section 2 of D. Morey, M. Maybury and B. Thuraisingham (eds.), Knowledge Management: Classic and Contemporary Works, Cambridge, MA.
36. Konrad, M. (2005a), Nameless Relations: Anonymity, Melanesia and Reproductve Gift Exchange between British Ova Donors and Recipients, Oxford.
37. Konrad, M. (2005), 'Travelling concepts', paper presented at Conference, 'Description and Creativity: Approaches to Collaboration and Value from Anthropology, Art, Science and Technology', convened by J. Leach, Cambridge.
38. Lambert, R. (2003), Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration: Final Report, HM Treasury, London ( www.lambertreview.org.uk).
39. Law, J. (1994), Organising Modernity, Oxford.
40. Law, J. (2004), After Method: Mess in Social Science Research, London.
41. Leach, J. (2004), 'Modes of creativity', in E. Hirsch and M. Strathern (eds.), Transactions and Creations: Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia, Oxford.
42. Leach, J. (convenor) (2005), 'Description and Creativity: Approaches to Collaboration and Value from Anthropology, Art, Science and Technology', Conference, King's College, Cambridge. (www.nomadit.co.uk).
43. Leahy, W. (2005), 'Teaching plagiarism', Times Higher Education Supplement, 4 November, 16.
44. Lederman, R. (2005), 'Unchosen grounds: Cultivating cross-subfield accents for a public voice', in D. Segal and S. Yanagisako (eds.), Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle: Reflections on the Disciplining of Anthropology, Durham, NC.
45. Locke, J. (1690), An essay concerning human understanding, London, Ward, Lock & Co, this edition, no date.
46. Luhmann, N. (1990), 'The autopoiesis of social systems', in N. Luhmannn, Essays on Self-Reference, New York.
47. Maasen, S. and O. Lieven (forthcoming), 'Transdisciplinarity: A new mode of governing science?', in S. Maasen, M. Lengwiller and M. Guggenheim (eds.), Discipline and Research: Practices of Inter-/Transdisciplinarity Cooperation in Science, Special Issue Science and Public Policy.
48. Macdonald, S. and E. Hirsch (2005), Rubric for panel, 'Creativity and temporality', at ASA conference on 'Creativity and Cultural Improvisation', Aberdeen.
49. McSherry, C. (2001), Who Owns Academic Work? Battling for Control of Intellectual Property, Cambridge, MA.
50. Maranta, A., M. Guggenheim, P. Gisler and C. Pohl (2003), 'The Reality of Experts and the Imagined Lay Person', Acta Sociologica, 46: 150-65.
51. Maurer, B. (2005), Mutual Life, Limited: Islamic Banking, Alternative Currencies, Lateral Reason, Princeton.
52. Melhuus, M. (2002), 'Issues of relevance: Anthropology and the challenges of cross-cultural comparison', in A. Gingrich and R. Fox (eds.)., Anthropology, by Comparison, London.
53. Miller, D. (2005), 'What is best "value"? Bureaucracy, virtualism and local governance', in P. du Gay (ed.), The Values of Bureaucracy, Oxford.
54. Miyazaki, H. (2005), 'From sugar cane to "swords": hope and the extensibility of the gift in Fiji', Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, NS, 11: 277-95.
55. Miyazaki, H. and A. Riles (2005), 'Failure as an endpoint', in A. Ong and S. Collier (eds.), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, Oxford.
56. Mol, A. (2002), The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Durham, NC, and London.
57. Moore, H. and T. Sanders (eds.) (2006a), General Introduction to Anthropology in Theory. Issues in Epistemology, Oxford.
58. Moore, H. and T. Sanders (2006b), 'Anthropology and episteinology', in H. Moore and T. Sanders (eds.), Anthropology in Theory. Issues in Episteinology, Oxford.
59. Mosko, M. and F. Damon (eds.) (2005), On the Order of Chaos: Social Anthropology and the Science of Chaos, Oxford.
60. Muke, J. (1997), Affidavit in 'In the matter of an application under Section 57 of the Constitution: application by Individual and Community Rights Forum Inc. (ICRAF) in re: Miriam Willingal', National Court of Justice, Papua New Guinea Law Reports, Port Moresby.
61. Nowotny, H. (2003), 'The potential of transdisciplinarity', from CNRS symposium on 'Re-thinking Interdisciplinarity'. (http://www.interdisciplines. org/interdisciplinarity).
62. Nowotny, H. (2005), 'Science in society: the next phase in an impetuous relationship', Keynote speech to Science in Society Forum, Brussels.
63. Nowotny, H., P. Scott and M. Gibbons (2001), Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Oxford.
64. Pearson, R. W. and L. W. Sherman (eds.) (2005), The Use and Usefulness of the Social Sciences: Achievements, Disappointments, and Promise, special edn. Annals, AAPSS (American Academy of Political and Social Science).
65. Prewitt, K. (2005), 'Political ideas and a political science for policy', in R. W. Pearson and L. W. Sherman (eds.), The Use and Usefulness of the Social Sciences: Achievements, Disappointments, and Promise, special edn. Annals, AAPSS (American Academy of Political and Social Science).
66. Pryce, V. (2005), 'Driving productivity forward', FST [Foundation for Science and Technology] Journal, 18 (9): 13-14.
67. Rayner, S. (2002) 'In defence of disciplines: Personal reflections of an interdisciplinary scholar', Proceedings from Muscipoli Workshop, 2, Aarhus.
68. Reed, M. (2005), 'Beyond the iron cage? Bureaucracy and democracy in the knowledge economy and society', in P. du Gay (ed.), The Values of Bureaucracy, Oxford.
69. Riles, A. (2000), The Network Inside Out, Ann Arbor, MI.
70. Riles, A. (2004), 'Property as legal knowledge: means and ends', Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, NS 10: 775-95.
71. Ryan, D. (1998) 'The Thatcher Government's attack on Higher Education in historical perspective', New Left Review, 227: 3-32
72. Schlecker, M. and E. Hirsch (2001), 'Incomplete knowledge: ethnography and the crisis of context in studies of the media, science and technology', History of the Human Sciences, 14: 69-87.
73. Schlesinger, P. (2001), 'Media research and the audit culture', in G. Philo and D. Miller (eds.), Market Killing, London.
74. Schneider, A. (2002),' "The red man will eat you": A Gawigl's view of what is beyond their society', paper presented at Daniel de Coppet Memorial Sympiosium, 'The Comparative Anthropological Analysis of Incorporating the Stranger', Leiden.
75. Schön, D. (2002 [1st pub. 1983]), The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action, Aldershot.
76. Segal, D. and S. Yanagisako (eds) (2005) Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle: Reflections on the Disciplining of Anthropology, Durham NC.
77. Shore, C. and S. Wright (1999), 'Audit culture and anthropology: neo-liberalism in British Higher Education', Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, NS, 5: 557-75.
78. Strathern, A. (1977), 'Melpa food-names as an expression of ideas on identity and substance', Journal of Polynesian Society, 86: 503-11.
79. Strathern, M. (1991), Partial Connections, Lanham, MD.
80. Strathern, M. (2004a), 'Laudable aims and problematic consequences, or: The "flow" of knowledge is not neutral', Economy and Society, 33: 550-61.
81. Strathern, M.(2004b), Commons and Borderlands: Working Papers on interdisciplinarity. Accountability and the Flow of Knowledge, Wantage.
82. Strathern, M. (2006), 'A community of critics: thoughts on new knowledge', Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, NS, 12: 191-209.
83. Stronach, I. (1999), 'Shouting theatre in a crowded fire: "educational effectiveness" as cultural performance', Evaluation 5: 173-93.
84. Sykes, K. (2005), Arguing with Anthropology: An Introduction to Critical Theories of the Gift, London.
85. Takeuchi, H. and I. Nonaka (2002), '"Classic Work": Theory of organizational knowledge creation', in D. Morey, M. Maybury and D. Thuraisingham (eds.), Knowledge Management: Classic and Contemporary Works, Cambridge, MA.
86. Toren, C. (2002), 'Comparison and ontogeny', in A. Gingrich and R. Fox (eds.), Anthropology, by comparison, London.
87. Tsing, A. L. (2005), Friction: an Ethnography of Global Connection, Princeton.
88. Tsoukas, H. (1997), 'The tyranny of light: the temptations and paradoxes of the information society', Futures, 29: 827-43.
89. Viveiros de Castro, E. (2003), 'And', After-dinner speech given at 'Anthropology and Science', 5th Decennial Conference of the ASA, Manchester, Manchester Papers in Social Anthropology, no. 7.
90. Wagner, R. (1991), 'The fractal person', in M. Godelier and M. Strathern (eds.), Big Men and Great Men: Personifications of Power in Melanesia, Cambridge.
91. Wastell, S. and D. Demian (2005), Rubric for panel, 'The creativity of social, political and religious life', at ASA conference on 'Creativity and Cultural Improvisation', Aberdeen.
92. Wedel, J. R., C. Shore, G. Feldman and S. Lathrop (2005), 'Towards an anthropology of public policy', in R. W. Pearson and L. W Sherman (eds.), The Use and Usefulness of the Social Sciences: Achievements, Disappointments, and Promise, special edn. Annals, AAPSS (American Academy of Political and Social Science).
93. Wilsdon, J. and R. Willis (2004), See-Through Science. Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream, London.
94. Wilson, R. (1997), 'Representing human rights violations: social contexts and subjectivities', in R. Wilson (ed.), Human Rights, Culture and Context. Anthropological Perspectives, London and Chicago.
95. Yanagisako, S. (2005), 'Flexible disciplinary: Beyond the Americanist tradition', in D. Segal and S. Yanagisako (eds.), Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle: Reflections on the Disciplining of Anthropology, Durham, NC.
96. Ziman, J. (2000), Real Science: What it is and What it Means, Cambridge.